歧义与冲突条件下治疗决策的实验研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Decision Making Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-04 DOI:10.1177/0272989X251346853
Yiyun Shou, Amelia Gulliver, Louise M Farrer, Amy Dawel, Eryn Newman, Michael Smithson
{"title":"歧义与冲突条件下治疗决策的实验研究。","authors":"Yiyun Shou, Amelia Gulliver, Louise M Farrer, Amy Dawel, Eryn Newman, Michael Smithson","doi":"10.1177/0272989X251346853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionEffective risk communication is essential for medical professionals to assist patients to make informed decisions. However, risk communication can be challenging as patients receive ambiguous and conflicting information.ObjectivesThis study aimed to examine how uncertainty influences individuals' perceptions and preferences and interacts with message framing in a medical treatment decision scenario.MethodsThe present study included a large representative sample of Australians (<i>N</i> = 805). A randomized experiment was conducted presenting a scenario about hypothetical COVID-19 treatment alternatives with varying uncertainty and framing in treatment information.ResultsThe results showed that conflicting information and loss framing had deleterious effects on participants' willingness to take a treatment and trust in the sources providing the information, compared with information that was precise, ambiguous, or in a gain frame. The effects could be stronger among participants who are risk averse, anxious, and native language speakers.ConclusionThe findings highlight that patients may be more averse to a treatment option and reduce their trust in medical professionals when they are provided with ambiguous information and particularly when information that conflicts with other sources including other medical professionals. It is important for medical professionals to be aware of other information patients have sourced that may conflict with information provided by the medical professionals during the consultation and to assist patients with high levels of risk aversion and anxiety in their decision making.HighlightsConflicting information and loss framing had deleterious effects on participants' willingness to take a treatment.Conflicting information and loss framing also reduced participants' trust in the sources of the information.The deleterious effects were stronger among participants who were native language speakers and were risk averse and anxious.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"892-903"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Experimental Investigation of Treatment Decisions under Ambiguity and Conflict.\",\"authors\":\"Yiyun Shou, Amelia Gulliver, Louise M Farrer, Amy Dawel, Eryn Newman, Michael Smithson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0272989X251346853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionEffective risk communication is essential for medical professionals to assist patients to make informed decisions. However, risk communication can be challenging as patients receive ambiguous and conflicting information.ObjectivesThis study aimed to examine how uncertainty influences individuals' perceptions and preferences and interacts with message framing in a medical treatment decision scenario.MethodsThe present study included a large representative sample of Australians (<i>N</i> = 805). A randomized experiment was conducted presenting a scenario about hypothetical COVID-19 treatment alternatives with varying uncertainty and framing in treatment information.ResultsThe results showed that conflicting information and loss framing had deleterious effects on participants' willingness to take a treatment and trust in the sources providing the information, compared with information that was precise, ambiguous, or in a gain frame. The effects could be stronger among participants who are risk averse, anxious, and native language speakers.ConclusionThe findings highlight that patients may be more averse to a treatment option and reduce their trust in medical professionals when they are provided with ambiguous information and particularly when information that conflicts with other sources including other medical professionals. It is important for medical professionals to be aware of other information patients have sourced that may conflict with information provided by the medical professionals during the consultation and to assist patients with high levels of risk aversion and anxiety in their decision making.HighlightsConflicting information and loss framing had deleterious effects on participants' willingness to take a treatment.Conflicting information and loss framing also reduced participants' trust in the sources of the information.The deleterious effects were stronger among participants who were native language speakers and were risk averse and anxious.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Decision Making\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"892-903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X251346853\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X251346853","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的风险沟通对于医疗专业人员帮助患者做出明智的决定至关重要。然而,当患者收到模棱两可和相互矛盾的信息时,风险沟通可能具有挑战性。目的本研究旨在探讨不确定性如何影响个体的感知和偏好,并与医疗决策场景中的信息框架相互作用。方法本研究纳入了大量具有代表性的澳大利亚人样本(N = 805)。通过一项随机实验,提出了一种假设的COVID-19治疗方案,这些方案具有不同的不确定性和治疗信息的框架。结果结果表明,与精确、模糊或增益框架的信息相比,冲突的信息和损失框架对参与者采取治疗的意愿和对提供信息的来源的信任产生了有害影响。在风险厌恶、焦虑和母语人士中,这种影响可能更强。结论研究结果强调,当患者被提供模棱两可的信息时,特别是当这些信息与其他来源(包括其他医疗专业人员)冲突时,患者可能会更反对一种治疗方案,并降低对医疗专业人员的信任。对于医疗专业人员来说,重要的是要了解患者获得的其他信息,这些信息可能与医疗专业人员在咨询期间提供的信息相冲突,并帮助高度厌恶风险和焦虑的患者做出决策。冲突的信息和损失框架对参与者接受治疗的意愿产生了有害的影响。信息冲突和损失框架也降低了参与者对信息来源的信任。在以母语为母语、厌恶风险和焦虑的参与者中,有害影响更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Experimental Investigation of Treatment Decisions under Ambiguity and Conflict.

IntroductionEffective risk communication is essential for medical professionals to assist patients to make informed decisions. However, risk communication can be challenging as patients receive ambiguous and conflicting information.ObjectivesThis study aimed to examine how uncertainty influences individuals' perceptions and preferences and interacts with message framing in a medical treatment decision scenario.MethodsThe present study included a large representative sample of Australians (N = 805). A randomized experiment was conducted presenting a scenario about hypothetical COVID-19 treatment alternatives with varying uncertainty and framing in treatment information.ResultsThe results showed that conflicting information and loss framing had deleterious effects on participants' willingness to take a treatment and trust in the sources providing the information, compared with information that was precise, ambiguous, or in a gain frame. The effects could be stronger among participants who are risk averse, anxious, and native language speakers.ConclusionThe findings highlight that patients may be more averse to a treatment option and reduce their trust in medical professionals when they are provided with ambiguous information and particularly when information that conflicts with other sources including other medical professionals. It is important for medical professionals to be aware of other information patients have sourced that may conflict with information provided by the medical professionals during the consultation and to assist patients with high levels of risk aversion and anxiety in their decision making.HighlightsConflicting information and loss framing had deleterious effects on participants' willingness to take a treatment.Conflicting information and loss framing also reduced participants' trust in the sources of the information.The deleterious effects were stronger among participants who were native language speakers and were risk averse and anxious.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信