Jenna K. Felli, Derek J. Leishman, Meredith A. Steeves
{"title":"使用预先存在的对照数据在临床前研究中设定期望。","authors":"Jenna K. Felli, Derek J. Leishman, Meredith A. Steeves","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This work presents a conceptual approach to limit the use of live subjects for preclinical toxicological studies by leveraging pre-existing control data. Given a valid set of pre-existing control data, one can use probabilistic methods to set expectations for targeted study outcomes prior to undertaking a study. We do not address current efforts underway to generate, simulate, validate, or otherwise model or construct such data sets (<em>e.g., mathematical models, virtual control groups</em>). Rather, we assume the existence of an appropriately collected and curated data set of relevant metrics representative of control subjects and illustrate the use of probabilistic methods to set expectations a priori for experimental outcomes for commonly measured endpoints. We explore using the T-distribution to set expectations for small sample sizes when endpoints are continuous measures (<em>e.g., organ weights</em>) and the sample average of the data set is a good proxy for the true population mean. When endpoints are discrete measures (<em>e.g., grades of specific pathologies</em>) or the sample average of the data set does not serve as a good proxy, we employ bootstrapping to generate a distribution. We conclude that these probabilistic approaches can help investigators understand the behavior of endpoints in an untreated population and help set a priori expectations for “normalcy” when interrogating study results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105899"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using pre-existing control data to set expectations in preclinical studies\",\"authors\":\"Jenna K. Felli, Derek J. Leishman, Meredith A. Steeves\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This work presents a conceptual approach to limit the use of live subjects for preclinical toxicological studies by leveraging pre-existing control data. Given a valid set of pre-existing control data, one can use probabilistic methods to set expectations for targeted study outcomes prior to undertaking a study. We do not address current efforts underway to generate, simulate, validate, or otherwise model or construct such data sets (<em>e.g., mathematical models, virtual control groups</em>). Rather, we assume the existence of an appropriately collected and curated data set of relevant metrics representative of control subjects and illustrate the use of probabilistic methods to set expectations a priori for experimental outcomes for commonly measured endpoints. We explore using the T-distribution to set expectations for small sample sizes when endpoints are continuous measures (<em>e.g., organ weights</em>) and the sample average of the data set is a good proxy for the true population mean. When endpoints are discrete measures (<em>e.g., grades of specific pathologies</em>) or the sample average of the data set does not serve as a good proxy, we employ bootstrapping to generate a distribution. We conclude that these probabilistic approaches can help investigators understand the behavior of endpoints in an untreated population and help set a priori expectations for “normalcy” when interrogating study results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using pre-existing control data to set expectations in preclinical studies
This work presents a conceptual approach to limit the use of live subjects for preclinical toxicological studies by leveraging pre-existing control data. Given a valid set of pre-existing control data, one can use probabilistic methods to set expectations for targeted study outcomes prior to undertaking a study. We do not address current efforts underway to generate, simulate, validate, or otherwise model or construct such data sets (e.g., mathematical models, virtual control groups). Rather, we assume the existence of an appropriately collected and curated data set of relevant metrics representative of control subjects and illustrate the use of probabilistic methods to set expectations a priori for experimental outcomes for commonly measured endpoints. We explore using the T-distribution to set expectations for small sample sizes when endpoints are continuous measures (e.g., organ weights) and the sample average of the data set is a good proxy for the true population mean. When endpoints are discrete measures (e.g., grades of specific pathologies) or the sample average of the data set does not serve as a good proxy, we employ bootstrapping to generate a distribution. We conclude that these probabilistic approaches can help investigators understand the behavior of endpoints in an untreated population and help set a priori expectations for “normalcy” when interrogating study results.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)