{"title":"杜氏肌萎缩症临床试验中不公平的种族和民族代表性。","authors":"Miranda Creasey, Mathula Thangarajh","doi":"10.1055/a-2648-3203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated racial and ethnic distribution of participants in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) Phase II and III clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 36 DMD Phase II and III clinical trials were analyzed for racial and ethnicity information. Publicly available demographic information was collected from DMD Phase II and III clinical trials registered between 2005 to 2018 from the Clinical Trials database (clinicaltrials.gov). Clinical trial participation was also analyzed based on geographic location (international versus United States) and funding source (industry versus academia).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>White participants accounted for 84% of study participants in DMD Phase II and Phase III clinical trials in both multinational studies and within continental United States. Among the 36 trials, 22% (8/36) did not report racial data and 44% (16/36) did not report ethnicity. Most DMD Phase II and III clinical trials were funded by industry (89%) compared to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (3%), and other sources (8%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>White participants are most represented in DMD Phase II and III clinical trials. The documentation of racial and ethnic information in DMD clinical trials are insufficient. These data highlight the need for further approaches to diversify and include equitable representation in DMD clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19421,"journal":{"name":"Neuropediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequitable racial and ethnic representation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Miranda Creasey, Mathula Thangarajh\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2648-3203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated racial and ethnic distribution of participants in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) Phase II and III clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 36 DMD Phase II and III clinical trials were analyzed for racial and ethnicity information. Publicly available demographic information was collected from DMD Phase II and III clinical trials registered between 2005 to 2018 from the Clinical Trials database (clinicaltrials.gov). Clinical trial participation was also analyzed based on geographic location (international versus United States) and funding source (industry versus academia).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>White participants accounted for 84% of study participants in DMD Phase II and Phase III clinical trials in both multinational studies and within continental United States. Among the 36 trials, 22% (8/36) did not report racial data and 44% (16/36) did not report ethnicity. Most DMD Phase II and III clinical trials were funded by industry (89%) compared to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (3%), and other sources (8%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>White participants are most represented in DMD Phase II and III clinical trials. The documentation of racial and ethnic information in DMD clinical trials are insufficient. These data highlight the need for further approaches to diversify and include equitable representation in DMD clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2648-3203\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2648-3203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inequitable racial and ethnic representation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Clinical Trials.
Objective: We investigated racial and ethnic distribution of participants in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) Phase II and III clinical trials.
Methods: A total of 36 DMD Phase II and III clinical trials were analyzed for racial and ethnicity information. Publicly available demographic information was collected from DMD Phase II and III clinical trials registered between 2005 to 2018 from the Clinical Trials database (clinicaltrials.gov). Clinical trial participation was also analyzed based on geographic location (international versus United States) and funding source (industry versus academia).
Results: White participants accounted for 84% of study participants in DMD Phase II and Phase III clinical trials in both multinational studies and within continental United States. Among the 36 trials, 22% (8/36) did not report racial data and 44% (16/36) did not report ethnicity. Most DMD Phase II and III clinical trials were funded by industry (89%) compared to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (3%), and other sources (8%).
Interpretation: White participants are most represented in DMD Phase II and III clinical trials. The documentation of racial and ethnic information in DMD clinical trials are insufficient. These data highlight the need for further approaches to diversify and include equitable representation in DMD clinical trials.
期刊介绍:
For key insights into today''s practice of pediatric neurology, Neuropediatrics is the worldwide journal of choice. Original articles, case reports and panel discussions are the distinctive features of a journal that always keeps abreast of current developments and trends - the reason it has developed into an internationally recognized forum for specialists throughout the world.
Pediatricians, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and neurobiologists will find it essential reading.