来源不明的栓塞性卒中患者使用抗血小板药物或抗凝治疗的结果:一项多中心队列研究

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology Pub Date : 2025-08-12 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000213876
James Ernest Siegler, Elena Badillo Goicoechea, Mary Penckofer, Kelsey Eklund, Shadi Yaghi, Christoph Stretz, Christina M Lineback, Brian Stamm, Shani Peter, Marissa D'Souza, F Garrett Conyers, Farid Khasiyev, Deborah Kerrigan, Skylar Lewis, Hamid Ali, Hassan Aboul-Nour, Richa Sharma, Fadi B Nahab, Patrick Glover, Sean L Thompson, Qasem N Alshaer, Neeharika Thottempudi, Adam de Havenon, Collin J Culbertson, Emiliya Melkumova, Rafail A Chionatos, Dinesh V Jillella, Jean-Philippe Auguste Daniel, Jennifer Ro, Michael R Frankel, Oana M Dumitrascu, Samantha Brown, Parth Parikh, Charles Doolittle, Ian Yahnke, Anvitha Sathya, Jieun Kang, Kaitlyn Kirchhoffer, Anna Bowman, Matthew M Smith, James R Brorson, Aaron Asabere, Mahan Shahrivari, Cheran Elangovan, Nazanin Sheibani, Balaji Krishnaiah, Elizabeth Gaudio, Kelly L Sloane, Aaron Rothstein, Muhammad M Alvi, Saketh Annam, Curtis Amankwah, Wayneho Kam, Nandini Abburi, Mudassir Farooqui, Diana Rojas-Soto, Amir Molaie, Nicole Khezri, Adeel S Zubair, Mehdi Abbasi, Russell J Van Coevering, Lucia Chen, Simona Nedelcu, Franziska Herpich, Dalia Chahien, Siddharth Sehgal, David S Liebeskind, Guillermo Linares, Alicia Zha, Monica Sarkar, Romi Xi, Ashley Nelson, Ahmad Abu Qdais, Sami Al Kasab, Eesha Singh, Vivek Patel, Yasmin Ninette Aziz, Prachi Mehndiratta, Alexis DeMarco, Anjail Sharrief, Brett Cucchiara, Setareh Salehi Omran, Thanh N Nguyen, Michael Dubinski, Jiyoun Ackerman, Jesse Thon
{"title":"来源不明的栓塞性卒中患者使用抗血小板药物或抗凝治疗的结果:一项多中心队列研究","authors":"James Ernest Siegler, Elena Badillo Goicoechea, Mary Penckofer, Kelsey Eklund, Shadi Yaghi, Christoph Stretz, Christina M Lineback, Brian Stamm, Shani Peter, Marissa D'Souza, F Garrett Conyers, Farid Khasiyev, Deborah Kerrigan, Skylar Lewis, Hamid Ali, Hassan Aboul-Nour, Richa Sharma, Fadi B Nahab, Patrick Glover, Sean L Thompson, Qasem N Alshaer, Neeharika Thottempudi, Adam de Havenon, Collin J Culbertson, Emiliya Melkumova, Rafail A Chionatos, Dinesh V Jillella, Jean-Philippe Auguste Daniel, Jennifer Ro, Michael R Frankel, Oana M Dumitrascu, Samantha Brown, Parth Parikh, Charles Doolittle, Ian Yahnke, Anvitha Sathya, Jieun Kang, Kaitlyn Kirchhoffer, Anna Bowman, Matthew M Smith, James R Brorson, Aaron Asabere, Mahan Shahrivari, Cheran Elangovan, Nazanin Sheibani, Balaji Krishnaiah, Elizabeth Gaudio, Kelly L Sloane, Aaron Rothstein, Muhammad M Alvi, Saketh Annam, Curtis Amankwah, Wayneho Kam, Nandini Abburi, Mudassir Farooqui, Diana Rojas-Soto, Amir Molaie, Nicole Khezri, Adeel S Zubair, Mehdi Abbasi, Russell J Van Coevering, Lucia Chen, Simona Nedelcu, Franziska Herpich, Dalia Chahien, Siddharth Sehgal, David S Liebeskind, Guillermo Linares, Alicia Zha, Monica Sarkar, Romi Xi, Ashley Nelson, Ahmad Abu Qdais, Sami Al Kasab, Eesha Singh, Vivek Patel, Yasmin Ninette Aziz, Prachi Mehndiratta, Alexis DeMarco, Anjail Sharrief, Brett Cucchiara, Setareh Salehi Omran, Thanh N Nguyen, Michael Dubinski, Jiyoun Ackerman, Jesse Thon","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000213876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) can be attributed to a variety of potential embolic sources, with differential response to anticoagulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study (27 sites) of consecutive adult patients with acute ischemic stroke due to ESUS (admitted 2015-2024) was conducted. The aim was to compare outcomes after antiplatelet(s) vs anticoagulant (±antiplatelet) treatment in patients with ESUS across potential embolic sources. The time from admission to the primary composite outcome of recurrent stroke, major bleeding, or death was assessed using adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression (clustered by site) and propensity score (PS) matching with (1) inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and (2) 10:1 nearest-neighbor matching with replacement, adjusting for age, stroke severity, and potential embolic sources (e.g., left ventricular injury and patent foramen ovale). Recurrent stroke, major bleeding, and death were also assessed as secondary outcomes, with stratification by potential embolic sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,328 included patients (n = 230 treated with anticoagulation), the median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 54-75), 50% were female, and the median NIH Stroke Scale score was 4 (IQR 2-11). Compared with patients treated using antiplatelet(s) therapies, those treated with anticoagulants were not at a lower risk of the primary outcome in the adjusted Cox model (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.69-1.45), adjusted IPTW regression model (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 0.79-1.66), or 10:1 PS-matched regression model (aHR 1.00, 95% CI 0.70-1.44). In patients with left ventricular injury, anticoagulation was associated with a lower rate of the primary outcome (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.77; <i>p</i>-interaction <0.01) and trended toward a lower rate of recurrent ischemic stroke (aHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-1.08; <i>p</i>-interaction = 0.04) when compared with patients treated with antiplatelet(s).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These real-world data validate randomized trial results in ESUS, which reported no net benefit of anticoagulation over antiplatelet therapy. These data suggest possible benefit of anticoagulation in patients with left ventricular injury, as in previous cohort studies, although the findings are limited by the small number of patients treated with anticoagulation. Future trials should evaluate treatment differences in this subgroup.</p><p><strong>Trial registration information: </strong>Cardiac Abnormalities in Stroke Prevention and Risk of Recurrence; registration ID: NCT06398366. Registered on May 3, 2024.</p><p><strong>Classification of evidence: </strong>This study provides Class III evidence that in patients with ESUS, anticoagulation was not superior to antiplatelet therapy in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke, bleeding, or death.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"105 3","pages":"e213876"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Treated With Antiplatelet Agents or Anticoagulation: A Multicenter Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"James Ernest Siegler, Elena Badillo Goicoechea, Mary Penckofer, Kelsey Eklund, Shadi Yaghi, Christoph Stretz, Christina M Lineback, Brian Stamm, Shani Peter, Marissa D'Souza, F Garrett Conyers, Farid Khasiyev, Deborah Kerrigan, Skylar Lewis, Hamid Ali, Hassan Aboul-Nour, Richa Sharma, Fadi B Nahab, Patrick Glover, Sean L Thompson, Qasem N Alshaer, Neeharika Thottempudi, Adam de Havenon, Collin J Culbertson, Emiliya Melkumova, Rafail A Chionatos, Dinesh V Jillella, Jean-Philippe Auguste Daniel, Jennifer Ro, Michael R Frankel, Oana M Dumitrascu, Samantha Brown, Parth Parikh, Charles Doolittle, Ian Yahnke, Anvitha Sathya, Jieun Kang, Kaitlyn Kirchhoffer, Anna Bowman, Matthew M Smith, James R Brorson, Aaron Asabere, Mahan Shahrivari, Cheran Elangovan, Nazanin Sheibani, Balaji Krishnaiah, Elizabeth Gaudio, Kelly L Sloane, Aaron Rothstein, Muhammad M Alvi, Saketh Annam, Curtis Amankwah, Wayneho Kam, Nandini Abburi, Mudassir Farooqui, Diana Rojas-Soto, Amir Molaie, Nicole Khezri, Adeel S Zubair, Mehdi Abbasi, Russell J Van Coevering, Lucia Chen, Simona Nedelcu, Franziska Herpich, Dalia Chahien, Siddharth Sehgal, David S Liebeskind, Guillermo Linares, Alicia Zha, Monica Sarkar, Romi Xi, Ashley Nelson, Ahmad Abu Qdais, Sami Al Kasab, Eesha Singh, Vivek Patel, Yasmin Ninette Aziz, Prachi Mehndiratta, Alexis DeMarco, Anjail Sharrief, Brett Cucchiara, Setareh Salehi Omran, Thanh N Nguyen, Michael Dubinski, Jiyoun Ackerman, Jesse Thon\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/WNL.0000000000213876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) can be attributed to a variety of potential embolic sources, with differential response to anticoagulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study (27 sites) of consecutive adult patients with acute ischemic stroke due to ESUS (admitted 2015-2024) was conducted. The aim was to compare outcomes after antiplatelet(s) vs anticoagulant (±antiplatelet) treatment in patients with ESUS across potential embolic sources. The time from admission to the primary composite outcome of recurrent stroke, major bleeding, or death was assessed using adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression (clustered by site) and propensity score (PS) matching with (1) inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and (2) 10:1 nearest-neighbor matching with replacement, adjusting for age, stroke severity, and potential embolic sources (e.g., left ventricular injury and patent foramen ovale). Recurrent stroke, major bleeding, and death were also assessed as secondary outcomes, with stratification by potential embolic sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,328 included patients (n = 230 treated with anticoagulation), the median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 54-75), 50% were female, and the median NIH Stroke Scale score was 4 (IQR 2-11). Compared with patients treated using antiplatelet(s) therapies, those treated with anticoagulants were not at a lower risk of the primary outcome in the adjusted Cox model (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.69-1.45), adjusted IPTW regression model (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 0.79-1.66), or 10:1 PS-matched regression model (aHR 1.00, 95% CI 0.70-1.44). In patients with left ventricular injury, anticoagulation was associated with a lower rate of the primary outcome (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.77; <i>p</i>-interaction <0.01) and trended toward a lower rate of recurrent ischemic stroke (aHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-1.08; <i>p</i>-interaction = 0.04) when compared with patients treated with antiplatelet(s).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These real-world data validate randomized trial results in ESUS, which reported no net benefit of anticoagulation over antiplatelet therapy. These data suggest possible benefit of anticoagulation in patients with left ventricular injury, as in previous cohort studies, although the findings are limited by the small number of patients treated with anticoagulation. Future trials should evaluate treatment differences in this subgroup.</p><p><strong>Trial registration information: </strong>Cardiac Abnormalities in Stroke Prevention and Risk of Recurrence; registration ID: NCT06398366. Registered on May 3, 2024.</p><p><strong>Classification of evidence: </strong>This study provides Class III evidence that in patients with ESUS, anticoagulation was not superior to antiplatelet therapy in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke, bleeding, or death.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology\",\"volume\":\"105 3\",\"pages\":\"e213876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000213876\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000213876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:不明来源栓塞性卒中(ESUS)可归因于多种潜在的栓塞源,对抗凝反应不同。方法:对2015-2024年收治的成人ESUS急性缺血性脑卒中患者进行多中心、回顾性观察队列研究(共27个站点)。目的是比较ESUS患者在接受抗血小板和抗凝(±抗血小板)治疗后的结果。使用调整后的Cox比例风险回归(按地点聚类)和倾向评分(PS)匹配(1)治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)和(2)与置换的10:1最近邻匹配,调整年龄、卒中严重程度和潜在栓塞源(如左心室损伤和卵圆孔未闭),评估从入院到复发性卒中、大出血或死亡的主要复合结局的时间。复发性卒中、大出血和死亡也被评估为次要结局,并按潜在栓塞源分层。结果:纳入的2328例患者(n = 230例接受抗凝治疗)中位年龄为65岁(四分位数范围[IQR] 54-75), 50%为女性,NIH卒中量表评分中位为4分(IQR 2-11)。与使用抗血小板治疗的患者相比,在校正Cox模型(校正风险比[aHR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.69-1.45)、校正IPTW回归模型(aHR 1.15, 95% CI 0.79-1.66)或10:1 ps匹配回归模型(aHR 1.00, 95% CI 0.70-1.44)中,接受抗凝治疗的患者的主要结局风险并没有降低。在左心室损伤患者中,抗凝治疗与较低的主要转归率相关(aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.77;p-相互作用p-相互作用= 0.04),与抗血小板治疗的患者相比。讨论:这些真实世界的数据验证了ESUS的随机试验结果,该结果报告抗凝治疗比抗血小板治疗没有净获益。这些数据表明抗凝治疗对左心室损伤患者可能有益处,就像以前的队列研究一样,尽管这些发现受到少量接受抗凝治疗患者的限制。未来的试验应评估该亚组的治疗差异。试验注册信息:心脏异常在卒中预防和复发风险;注册ID: NCT06398366。2024年5月3日注册。证据分类:本研究提供的III类证据表明,在ESUS患者中,抗凝治疗在降低卒中复发、出血或死亡风险方面并不优于抗血小板治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Treated With Antiplatelet Agents or Anticoagulation: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Background and objectives: Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) can be attributed to a variety of potential embolic sources, with differential response to anticoagulation.

Methods: A multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study (27 sites) of consecutive adult patients with acute ischemic stroke due to ESUS (admitted 2015-2024) was conducted. The aim was to compare outcomes after antiplatelet(s) vs anticoagulant (±antiplatelet) treatment in patients with ESUS across potential embolic sources. The time from admission to the primary composite outcome of recurrent stroke, major bleeding, or death was assessed using adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression (clustered by site) and propensity score (PS) matching with (1) inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and (2) 10:1 nearest-neighbor matching with replacement, adjusting for age, stroke severity, and potential embolic sources (e.g., left ventricular injury and patent foramen ovale). Recurrent stroke, major bleeding, and death were also assessed as secondary outcomes, with stratification by potential embolic sources.

Results: Of the 2,328 included patients (n = 230 treated with anticoagulation), the median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 54-75), 50% were female, and the median NIH Stroke Scale score was 4 (IQR 2-11). Compared with patients treated using antiplatelet(s) therapies, those treated with anticoagulants were not at a lower risk of the primary outcome in the adjusted Cox model (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.69-1.45), adjusted IPTW regression model (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 0.79-1.66), or 10:1 PS-matched regression model (aHR 1.00, 95% CI 0.70-1.44). In patients with left ventricular injury, anticoagulation was associated with a lower rate of the primary outcome (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.77; p-interaction <0.01) and trended toward a lower rate of recurrent ischemic stroke (aHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-1.08; p-interaction = 0.04) when compared with patients treated with antiplatelet(s).

Discussion: These real-world data validate randomized trial results in ESUS, which reported no net benefit of anticoagulation over antiplatelet therapy. These data suggest possible benefit of anticoagulation in patients with left ventricular injury, as in previous cohort studies, although the findings are limited by the small number of patients treated with anticoagulation. Future trials should evaluate treatment differences in this subgroup.

Trial registration information: Cardiac Abnormalities in Stroke Prevention and Risk of Recurrence; registration ID: NCT06398366. Registered on May 3, 2024.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that in patients with ESUS, anticoagulation was not superior to antiplatelet therapy in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke, bleeding, or death.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信