{"title":"腓骨下结节症状因素的超声比较。","authors":"Tomohiro Matsui, Kenji Honda, Tsukasa Kumai, Takeshi Sugimoto, Yasushi Shinohara, Yasuhito Tanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2025.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The os subfibulare is considered a fusion failure of the secondary ossification center or avulsion fracture at the lateral ankle ligament involving the anterior talofibular ligament alone or in combination with the calcaneofibular ligament. The os subfibulare causes symptomatic repetitive ankle sprains; however, asymptomatic forms exist. We aimed to identify the symptomatic factors of os subfibulare using ultrasonography (US).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one feet of patients who underwent operative treatment for symptomatic os subfibulare and 24 feet of those with asymptomatic os subfibulare were examined. US images were retrospectively evaluated, and the size of the ossicle, distance from the lateral malleolus to the ossicle, and instability of the ossicle during the anterior drawer stress ultrasonography test were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The size of the ossicle was mean 6.0 mm and 5.6 mm for the patient and control groups, respectively (p = 0.61). The distance in the rest position was mean 3.9 mm and 2.5 mm (p < 0.05) and median 1.4 mm and 0.0 mm during the stress test (p < 0.05) for the patient and control groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US is a useful examination tool for predicting os subfibulare prognosis. Additionally, the distance from the lateral malleolus in the rest position and dynamic instability were predictive factors for symptomatic os subfibulare.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>Level Ⅲ, Case control study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of symptomatic factors of os subfibulare using ultrasonography.\",\"authors\":\"Tomohiro Matsui, Kenji Honda, Tsukasa Kumai, Takeshi Sugimoto, Yasushi Shinohara, Yasuhito Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jos.2025.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The os subfibulare is considered a fusion failure of the secondary ossification center or avulsion fracture at the lateral ankle ligament involving the anterior talofibular ligament alone or in combination with the calcaneofibular ligament. The os subfibulare causes symptomatic repetitive ankle sprains; however, asymptomatic forms exist. We aimed to identify the symptomatic factors of os subfibulare using ultrasonography (US).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one feet of patients who underwent operative treatment for symptomatic os subfibulare and 24 feet of those with asymptomatic os subfibulare were examined. US images were retrospectively evaluated, and the size of the ossicle, distance from the lateral malleolus to the ossicle, and instability of the ossicle during the anterior drawer stress ultrasonography test were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The size of the ossicle was mean 6.0 mm and 5.6 mm for the patient and control groups, respectively (p = 0.61). The distance in the rest position was mean 3.9 mm and 2.5 mm (p < 0.05) and median 1.4 mm and 0.0 mm during the stress test (p < 0.05) for the patient and control groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US is a useful examination tool for predicting os subfibulare prognosis. Additionally, the distance from the lateral malleolus in the rest position and dynamic instability were predictive factors for symptomatic os subfibulare.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>Level Ⅲ, Case control study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.06.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.06.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:腓骨下os被认为是继发性骨化中心融合失败或外侧踝关节韧带撕脱骨折,仅累及距腓骨前韧带或与跟腓骨韧带合并。腓骨下肌引起症状性重复性踝关节扭伤;然而,也存在无症状的形式。我们的目的是利用超声检查(US)来确定腓骨下骨的症状因素。方法:对有症状的腓骨下肌行手术治疗的21英尺和无症状的腓骨下肌行手术治疗的24英尺进行分析。回顾性评估超声图像,评估前抽屉应力超声检查时听骨的大小、外踝到听骨的距离以及听骨的不稳定性。结果:实验组和对照组听骨大小分别为6.0 mm和5.6 mm,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.61)。在压力测试中,患者组和对照组的休息位置距离分别为3.9 mm和2.5 mm (p < 0.05),中位数分别为1.4 mm和0.0 mm (p < 0.05)。结论:超声是预测腓骨下骨预后的有效检查工具。此外,静止位置与外踝的距离和动力不稳定性是症状性腓骨下骨的预测因素。证据等级:Ⅲ级,病例对照研究。
Comparison of symptomatic factors of os subfibulare using ultrasonography.
Background: The os subfibulare is considered a fusion failure of the secondary ossification center or avulsion fracture at the lateral ankle ligament involving the anterior talofibular ligament alone or in combination with the calcaneofibular ligament. The os subfibulare causes symptomatic repetitive ankle sprains; however, asymptomatic forms exist. We aimed to identify the symptomatic factors of os subfibulare using ultrasonography (US).
Methods: Twenty-one feet of patients who underwent operative treatment for symptomatic os subfibulare and 24 feet of those with asymptomatic os subfibulare were examined. US images were retrospectively evaluated, and the size of the ossicle, distance from the lateral malleolus to the ossicle, and instability of the ossicle during the anterior drawer stress ultrasonography test were assessed.
Results: The size of the ossicle was mean 6.0 mm and 5.6 mm for the patient and control groups, respectively (p = 0.61). The distance in the rest position was mean 3.9 mm and 2.5 mm (p < 0.05) and median 1.4 mm and 0.0 mm during the stress test (p < 0.05) for the patient and control groups, respectively.
Conclusion: US is a useful examination tool for predicting os subfibulare prognosis. Additionally, the distance from the lateral malleolus in the rest position and dynamic instability were predictive factors for symptomatic os subfibulare.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.