{"title":"在白蛋白中加入米多卡因减少大容量穿刺并发症的发生率:一项比较米多卡因、特利加压素和白蛋白的随机对照试验。","authors":"Anand V Kulkarni, Rakhi Maiwall, Vinod Arora, Ankur Jindal, Sherin Thomas, Rehmat Ali, Sukriti Baweja, Ankit Bhardwaj, Guresh Kumar, Shiv Kumar Sarin","doi":"10.1007/s12072-025-10841-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Large-volume paracentesis (LVP), a therapeutic procedure for cirrhosis patients with refractory ascites, is associated with paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction (PICD). While albumin infusion is known to prevent PICD, it is unknown whether the addition of vasoconstrictors to albumin reduces complications of LVP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cirrhosis patients undergoing LVP for refractory ascites were randomized to receive albumin alone (Gr. I), terlipressin with albumin (Gr.II), or midodrine with albumin (Gr. III). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PICD, and the secondary endpoints were the incidence of new-onset complications (hyponatremia, acute kidney injury, and encephalopathy), 28-day survival and adverse events to therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-fifty cirrhosis patients with refractory ascites undergoing LVP were equally randomized to 3 groups. The incidence of PICD in Gr. I (14%), II (7%), and III (11%) was similar (p = 0.46). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) reduced in Gr.I and II compared to the rise in Gr. III on day 3 (ΔMAP: Gr.I = - 8.2 ± 5.01; Gr.II = - 4.34 ± 5.82; Gr. III = 9.16 ± 5.14 mmHg; p < 0.001), with a statistically significant rise in PRA (ng/ml/hour) at day 6 in Gr. I and II than in Gr. III. The incidence of new-onset complications was significantly higher in Gr.I (52.72%) and Gr.II (45.46%) than Gr.III (23.63%) (p = 0.005). Overall mortality on day 28 was not different between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PICD remains a challenge even in hospitalized settings. The addition of oral midodrine to albumin prevents hypotensive response on day 3, thereby reducing the incidence of new-onset complications following LVP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12901,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of midodrine to albumin reduces the incidence of complications of large-volume paracentesis: an RCT comparing midodrine, terlipressin, and albumin.\",\"authors\":\"Anand V Kulkarni, Rakhi Maiwall, Vinod Arora, Ankur Jindal, Sherin Thomas, Rehmat Ali, Sukriti Baweja, Ankit Bhardwaj, Guresh Kumar, Shiv Kumar Sarin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12072-025-10841-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Large-volume paracentesis (LVP), a therapeutic procedure for cirrhosis patients with refractory ascites, is associated with paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction (PICD). While albumin infusion is known to prevent PICD, it is unknown whether the addition of vasoconstrictors to albumin reduces complications of LVP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cirrhosis patients undergoing LVP for refractory ascites were randomized to receive albumin alone (Gr. I), terlipressin with albumin (Gr.II), or midodrine with albumin (Gr. III). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PICD, and the secondary endpoints were the incidence of new-onset complications (hyponatremia, acute kidney injury, and encephalopathy), 28-day survival and adverse events to therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-fifty cirrhosis patients with refractory ascites undergoing LVP were equally randomized to 3 groups. The incidence of PICD in Gr. I (14%), II (7%), and III (11%) was similar (p = 0.46). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) reduced in Gr.I and II compared to the rise in Gr. III on day 3 (ΔMAP: Gr.I = - 8.2 ± 5.01; Gr.II = - 4.34 ± 5.82; Gr. III = 9.16 ± 5.14 mmHg; p < 0.001), with a statistically significant rise in PRA (ng/ml/hour) at day 6 in Gr. I and II than in Gr. III. The incidence of new-onset complications was significantly higher in Gr.I (52.72%) and Gr.II (45.46%) than Gr.III (23.63%) (p = 0.005). Overall mortality on day 28 was not different between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PICD remains a challenge even in hospitalized settings. The addition of oral midodrine to albumin prevents hypotensive response on day 3, thereby reducing the incidence of new-onset complications following LVP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-025-10841-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-025-10841-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:大容量穿刺(LVP)是肝硬化难治性腹水患者的一种治疗方法,与穿刺诱导循环功能障碍(PICD)相关。虽然已知白蛋白输注可预防PICD,但尚不清楚在白蛋白中加入血管收缩剂是否可减少LVP的并发症。方法:接受LVP治疗难治性腹水的肝硬化患者被随机分为单独接受白蛋白(Gr.I)、特利加压素联合白蛋白(Gr. ii)或米多宁联合白蛋白(Gr. III)。主要终点是PICD的发生率,次要终点是新发并发症(低钠血症、急性肾损伤和脑病)、28天生存率和治疗不良事件的发生率。结果:150例肝硬化难治性腹水患者行LVP,随机分为3组。PICD在I级(14%)、II级(7%)和III级(11%)的发生率相似(p = 0.46)。第3天,Gr. i和II组平均动脉压(MAP)降低,而Gr. III组升高(ΔMAP: Gr. i = - 8.2±5.01;Gr.II = - 4.34±5.82;III级= 9.16±5.14 mmHg;结论:即使在住院环境中,PICD仍然是一个挑战。在白蛋白中加入口服米多卡因可防止第3天的降压反应,从而减少LVP后新发并发症的发生率。
Addition of midodrine to albumin reduces the incidence of complications of large-volume paracentesis: an RCT comparing midodrine, terlipressin, and albumin.
Background and aims: Large-volume paracentesis (LVP), a therapeutic procedure for cirrhosis patients with refractory ascites, is associated with paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction (PICD). While albumin infusion is known to prevent PICD, it is unknown whether the addition of vasoconstrictors to albumin reduces complications of LVP.
Methods: Cirrhosis patients undergoing LVP for refractory ascites were randomized to receive albumin alone (Gr. I), terlipressin with albumin (Gr.II), or midodrine with albumin (Gr. III). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PICD, and the secondary endpoints were the incidence of new-onset complications (hyponatremia, acute kidney injury, and encephalopathy), 28-day survival and adverse events to therapy.
Results: One hundred and sixty-fifty cirrhosis patients with refractory ascites undergoing LVP were equally randomized to 3 groups. The incidence of PICD in Gr. I (14%), II (7%), and III (11%) was similar (p = 0.46). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) reduced in Gr.I and II compared to the rise in Gr. III on day 3 (ΔMAP: Gr.I = - 8.2 ± 5.01; Gr.II = - 4.34 ± 5.82; Gr. III = 9.16 ± 5.14 mmHg; p < 0.001), with a statistically significant rise in PRA (ng/ml/hour) at day 6 in Gr. I and II than in Gr. III. The incidence of new-onset complications was significantly higher in Gr.I (52.72%) and Gr.II (45.46%) than Gr.III (23.63%) (p = 0.005). Overall mortality on day 28 was not different between the groups.
Conclusions: PICD remains a challenge even in hospitalized settings. The addition of oral midodrine to albumin prevents hypotensive response on day 3, thereby reducing the incidence of new-onset complications following LVP.
期刊介绍:
Hepatology International is the official journal of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). This is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal will focus mainly on new and emerging technologies, cutting-edge science and advances in liver and biliary disorders.
Types of articles published:
-Original Research Articles related to clinical care and basic research
-Review Articles
-Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment
-Clinical cases, images
-Selected Author Summaries
-Video Submissions