Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Yun-Mi Lim, Hyun-Jun Kim, Chong-Suh Lee
{"title":"尽管在成人脊柱畸形手术中实现了最佳的整体对齐,但未能实现脊柱侧凸研究协会-22r的相关因素的临床重要差异最小。","authors":"Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Yun-Mi Lim, Hyun-Jun Kim, Chong-Suh Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-09043-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify factors associated with failure to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) despite achieving optimal global alignment in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed consecutive patients who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion for ASD and achieved optimal global alignment at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they reached the MCID threshold (1.05) for the SRS-22r subtotal score. Demographic, surgical, radiographic, and mechanical complication data were compared between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of MCID failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 259 patients were included in this study (female, 88.0%; mean age, 69.0 years; mean follow-up duration, 36.5 months). At the final follow-up, 117 patients (45.2%) failed to achieve the SRS-22r MCID. Multivariate analysis identified a high preoperative SRS-22r pain score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.988, P = 0.003) and high preoperative self-image score (OR = 2.597, P = 0.006) as independent predictors of MCID failure. The cutoff values for preoperative pain and self-image scores were 2.50 and 1.70, respectively (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.674 for pain subdomain; AUC = 0.656 for self-image subdomain).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite achieving optimal global alignment, nearly half of the patients (45.2%) failed to reach the MCID in the SRS-22r score. Higher preoperative SRS-22r pain and self-image scores were significant predictors of failure. Therefore, these two factors should be primary considerations in surgical decision-making to improve patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with failure to achieve Scoliosis Research Society-22r minimal clinically important difference despite achieving optimal global alignment in adult spinal deformity surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Yun-Mi Lim, Hyun-Jun Kim, Chong-Suh Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-025-09043-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify factors associated with failure to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) despite achieving optimal global alignment in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed consecutive patients who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion for ASD and achieved optimal global alignment at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they reached the MCID threshold (1.05) for the SRS-22r subtotal score. Demographic, surgical, radiographic, and mechanical complication data were compared between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of MCID failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 259 patients were included in this study (female, 88.0%; mean age, 69.0 years; mean follow-up duration, 36.5 months). At the final follow-up, 117 patients (45.2%) failed to achieve the SRS-22r MCID. Multivariate analysis identified a high preoperative SRS-22r pain score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.988, P = 0.003) and high preoperative self-image score (OR = 2.597, P = 0.006) as independent predictors of MCID failure. The cutoff values for preoperative pain and self-image scores were 2.50 and 1.70, respectively (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.674 for pain subdomain; AUC = 0.656 for self-image subdomain).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite achieving optimal global alignment, nearly half of the patients (45.2%) failed to reach the MCID in the SRS-22r score. Higher preoperative SRS-22r pain and self-image scores were significant predictors of failure. Therefore, these two factors should be primary considerations in surgical decision-making to improve patient-reported outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09043-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09043-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:确定成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术中脊柱侧凸研究协会-22r (SRS-22r)尽管实现了最佳整体对齐,但未能实现最小临床重要差异(MCID)的相关因素。方法:本研究分析了连续接受≥5节段ASD融合并在至少2年随访中获得最佳整体对齐的患者。根据SRS-22r小总评分是否达到MCID阈值(1.05)将患者分为两组。比较两组间的人口学、外科、放射学和机械并发症数据。进行多变量logistic回归分析以确定MCID失败的独立预测因素。结果:本研究共纳入259例患者(女性占88.0%;平均年龄69.0岁;平均随访36.5个月)。在最后随访时,117例患者(45.2%)未能达到SRS-22r MCID。多因素分析发现术前高SRS-22r疼痛评分(比值比[OR] = 1.988, P = 0.003)和术前高自我形象评分(OR = 2.597, P = 0.006)是MCID失败的独立预测因子。术前疼痛和自我形象评分的截止值分别为2.50和1.70(疼痛子域曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.674;自图像子域的AUC = 0.656)。结论:尽管达到了最佳的全局对齐,但在SRS-22r评分中,近一半的患者(45.2%)未能达到MCID。术前较高的SRS-22r疼痛和自我形象评分是失败的显著预测因子。因此,这两个因素应作为手术决策的主要考虑因素,以改善患者报告的预后。
Factors associated with failure to achieve Scoliosis Research Society-22r minimal clinically important difference despite achieving optimal global alignment in adult spinal deformity surgery.
Purpose: To identify factors associated with failure to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) despite achieving optimal global alignment in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.
Methods: This study analyzed consecutive patients who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion for ASD and achieved optimal global alignment at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they reached the MCID threshold (1.05) for the SRS-22r subtotal score. Demographic, surgical, radiographic, and mechanical complication data were compared between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of MCID failure.
Results: A total of 259 patients were included in this study (female, 88.0%; mean age, 69.0 years; mean follow-up duration, 36.5 months). At the final follow-up, 117 patients (45.2%) failed to achieve the SRS-22r MCID. Multivariate analysis identified a high preoperative SRS-22r pain score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.988, P = 0.003) and high preoperative self-image score (OR = 2.597, P = 0.006) as independent predictors of MCID failure. The cutoff values for preoperative pain and self-image scores were 2.50 and 1.70, respectively (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.674 for pain subdomain; AUC = 0.656 for self-image subdomain).
Conclusions: Despite achieving optimal global alignment, nearly half of the patients (45.2%) failed to reach the MCID in the SRS-22r score. Higher preoperative SRS-22r pain and self-image scores were significant predictors of failure. Therefore, these two factors should be primary considerations in surgical decision-making to improve patient-reported outcomes.
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe