类风湿关节炎和脊椎关节炎中抗TNF α抑制剂抗体的患病率和影响:系统评价和亚组分析的Meta分析。

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ines Mahmoud, Selma Bouden, Rim Charfi, Yosr Abid, Chedly Dziri, Mouna Ben Sassi, Leila Rouached, Aicha Ben Tekaya, Raoudha Tekaya, Olfa Saidane, Leila Abdelmoula
{"title":"类风湿关节炎和脊椎关节炎中抗TNF α抑制剂抗体的患病率和影响:系统评价和亚组分析的Meta分析。","authors":"Ines Mahmoud, Selma Bouden, Rim Charfi, Yosr Abid, Chedly Dziri, Mouna Ben Sassi, Leila Rouached, Aicha Ben Tekaya, Raoudha Tekaya, Olfa Saidane, Leila Abdelmoula","doi":"10.2174/0115748863354926250620200719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to estimate the global prevalence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAb), their impact on response, and associated factors in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) treated by TNF alpha inhibitors (TNF-i).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus for observational, population-based studies published between Jan 2010 and Sept 2021. We included studies that reported the prevalence of ADAb (our main outcome) and examined their impact on treatment efficacy in adults treated with TNF-i (secondary outcome). To investigate heterogeneity, we used a Q-test and predictive interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall global prevalence of ADAb in RA was 20.8% (95%CI,6.8-25.5) (95%PI,6.12-51.42) and in SpA 24.8% (95%CI,19.1-31.5) (95%PI,7.31-57.98). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of ADAb between infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) in RA (p=0.21) nor in SpA (p=0.46). There was a statistically significant difference between IFX and etanercept (ETN) in RA (p<0.0001) as well as in SpA (p=0.001) and, likewise, between ADA and ETN in RA (p<0.0001) and in SpA (p=0.002). Study by subgroups of the impact of immunogenicity on response, according to the type of TNF-i, showed that the mean OR for ADA was 0.152 (CI 95%, 0.054 to 0.427) and for IFX was 0.144 (CI 95%, 0.055 to 0.378). The pairwise comparison of ADA vs IFX was not statistically significant (p=0.94). In subgroup analysis, according to the disease, the mean OR for RA was 0.149 (IC 95% 0.064 to 0.347) and for SpA was 0.303 (IC95% 0.103 to 0.890). The pairwise comparison of RA vs SpA was not statistically significant. The use of methotrexate tends to reduce the development of ADAb in RA and SpA with an OR=0.472 (CI95%,0.324-0.689) (PI95%,0.16-1.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ADAb were equally prevalent in RA and SpA treated with TNF-i. Immunogenicity was associated with response to treatment and influenced by concomitant use of methotrexate.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Impact of Antibodies Against TNF Alpha Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis: Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis with Subgroup Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ines Mahmoud, Selma Bouden, Rim Charfi, Yosr Abid, Chedly Dziri, Mouna Ben Sassi, Leila Rouached, Aicha Ben Tekaya, Raoudha Tekaya, Olfa Saidane, Leila Abdelmoula\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115748863354926250620200719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to estimate the global prevalence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAb), their impact on response, and associated factors in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) treated by TNF alpha inhibitors (TNF-i).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus for observational, population-based studies published between Jan 2010 and Sept 2021. We included studies that reported the prevalence of ADAb (our main outcome) and examined their impact on treatment efficacy in adults treated with TNF-i (secondary outcome). To investigate heterogeneity, we used a Q-test and predictive interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall global prevalence of ADAb in RA was 20.8% (95%CI,6.8-25.5) (95%PI,6.12-51.42) and in SpA 24.8% (95%CI,19.1-31.5) (95%PI,7.31-57.98). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of ADAb between infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) in RA (p=0.21) nor in SpA (p=0.46). There was a statistically significant difference between IFX and etanercept (ETN) in RA (p<0.0001) as well as in SpA (p=0.001) and, likewise, between ADA and ETN in RA (p<0.0001) and in SpA (p=0.002). Study by subgroups of the impact of immunogenicity on response, according to the type of TNF-i, showed that the mean OR for ADA was 0.152 (CI 95%, 0.054 to 0.427) and for IFX was 0.144 (CI 95%, 0.055 to 0.378). The pairwise comparison of ADA vs IFX was not statistically significant (p=0.94). In subgroup analysis, according to the disease, the mean OR for RA was 0.149 (IC 95% 0.064 to 0.347) and for SpA was 0.303 (IC95% 0.103 to 0.890). The pairwise comparison of RA vs SpA was not statistically significant. The use of methotrexate tends to reduce the development of ADAb in RA and SpA with an OR=0.472 (CI95%,0.324-0.689) (PI95%,0.16-1.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ADAb were equally prevalent in RA and SpA treated with TNF-i. Immunogenicity was associated with response to treatment and influenced by concomitant use of methotrexate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current drug safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current drug safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748863354926250620200719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748863354926250620200719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在估计抗药物抗体(ADAb)的全球患病率,它们对反应的影响,以及TNF α抑制剂(TNF-i)治疗的成人类风湿关节炎(RA)和脊柱关节炎(SpA)的相关因素。方法:检索PubMed、MEDLINE、Cochrane、Web of Science和Scopus,检索2010年1月至2021年9月间发表的基于人群的观察性研究。我们纳入了报告ADAb患病率的研究(我们的主要结局),并检查了它们对接受TNF-i治疗的成人疗效的影响(次要结局)。为了研究异质性,我们使用了q检验和预测区间。结果:RA患者ADAb的全球总体患病率为20.8% (95%CI,6.8 ~ 25.5) (95%PI,6.12 ~ 51.42), SpA患者为24.8% (95%CI,19.1 ~ 31.5) (95%PI,7.31 ~ 57.98)。英夫利昔单抗(IFX)和阿达木单抗(ADA)在RA中的ADAb患病率无显著差异(p=0.21),在SpA中也无显著差异(p=0.46)。IFX与依那西普(ETN)治疗RA的差异有统计学意义(p)结论:ADAb在TNF-i治疗RA和SpA中同样普遍。免疫原性与治疗反应有关,并受联合使用甲氨蝶呤的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence and Impact of Antibodies Against TNF Alpha Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis: Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis with Subgroup Analysis.

Objectives: We aimed to estimate the global prevalence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAb), their impact on response, and associated factors in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) treated by TNF alpha inhibitors (TNF-i).

Methods: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus for observational, population-based studies published between Jan 2010 and Sept 2021. We included studies that reported the prevalence of ADAb (our main outcome) and examined their impact on treatment efficacy in adults treated with TNF-i (secondary outcome). To investigate heterogeneity, we used a Q-test and predictive interval.

Results: The overall global prevalence of ADAb in RA was 20.8% (95%CI,6.8-25.5) (95%PI,6.12-51.42) and in SpA 24.8% (95%CI,19.1-31.5) (95%PI,7.31-57.98). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of ADAb between infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) in RA (p=0.21) nor in SpA (p=0.46). There was a statistically significant difference between IFX and etanercept (ETN) in RA (p<0.0001) as well as in SpA (p=0.001) and, likewise, between ADA and ETN in RA (p<0.0001) and in SpA (p=0.002). Study by subgroups of the impact of immunogenicity on response, according to the type of TNF-i, showed that the mean OR for ADA was 0.152 (CI 95%, 0.054 to 0.427) and for IFX was 0.144 (CI 95%, 0.055 to 0.378). The pairwise comparison of ADA vs IFX was not statistically significant (p=0.94). In subgroup analysis, according to the disease, the mean OR for RA was 0.149 (IC 95% 0.064 to 0.347) and for SpA was 0.303 (IC95% 0.103 to 0.890). The pairwise comparison of RA vs SpA was not statistically significant. The use of methotrexate tends to reduce the development of ADAb in RA and SpA with an OR=0.472 (CI95%,0.324-0.689) (PI95%,0.16-1.39).

Conclusion: ADAb were equally prevalent in RA and SpA treated with TNF-i. Immunogenicity was associated with response to treatment and influenced by concomitant use of methotrexate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current drug safety
Current drug safety PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Current Drug Safety publishes frontier articles on all the latest advances on drug safety. The journal aims to publish the highest quality research articles, reviews and case reports in the field. Topics covered include: adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes, management of adverse effects, pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology of new and existing drugs, post-marketing surveillance. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信