利用PBPK模型和模拟预测癌症患者CLDN18.2靶向抗体药物偶联药代动力学

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Chiara Zunino, Sichen Wang, Yanyan Zhang, Séverine Urdy, Wilhelmus E A de Witte, Xavier Declèves, Alicja Puszkiel, Nassim Djebli
{"title":"利用PBPK模型和模拟预测癌症患者CLDN18.2靶向抗体药物偶联药代动力学","authors":"Chiara Zunino, Sichen Wang, Yanyan Zhang, Séverine Urdy, Wilhelmus E A de Witte, Xavier Declèves, Alicja Puszkiel, Nassim Djebli","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a promising anticancer approach. Although physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modeling became essential in Pharmacometrics to characterize exposure in different tissues, very few PBPK models have been published for ADCs, none within the PK-Sim/MoBi software. To capture the pharmacokinetics (PK) of an anti-Claudin 18.2 ADC, a PBPK model was built in PK-Sim and MoBi and compared to observations from three clinical studies after intravenous (IV) administration in 109 patients with cancer. The PK parameters were considered inaccurate if the predicted error ratios were outside the two-fold error range (0.5-2). In PK-Sim, we defined one PBPK model comprising three compounds (ADC, payload, and naked antibody), which were mechanistically linked. This model captured the ADC PK profile. However, additional clearance mechanisms were essential to improve the fit of the ADC elimination phase. After integration of target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) and deconjugation of the payload in MoBi, 3 parameters were optimized for each of the ADC and the payload (degradation rate constant and reference concentration of the target, deconjugation rate constant, lipophilicity, nonspecific hepatic clearance rate constant and passive renal clearance of the payload). The PK data were adequately captured for both observed compounds, with a predicted error ratio within the two-fold range: C<sub>max</sub>_<sub>ADC</sub> (1.07-1.50), C<sub>max_Payload</sub> (0.56-1.18), AUC<sub>0-504h_ADC</sub> (0.73-1.23) and AUC<sub>0-504h_payload</sub> (0.77-1.37). The \"parameter optimization\" of different parameters allowed accurately capturing the observed data for both ADC and payload in cancer patients for an anti-Claudin 18.2 ADC. This analysis paves the way for PBPK modeling of other ADCs currently in development.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of a CLDN18.2 Targeted Antibody Drug Conjugate Pharmacokinetics in Cancer Patients Using PBPK Modeling and Simulation.\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Zunino, Sichen Wang, Yanyan Zhang, Séverine Urdy, Wilhelmus E A de Witte, Xavier Declèves, Alicja Puszkiel, Nassim Djebli\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp4.70071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a promising anticancer approach. Although physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modeling became essential in Pharmacometrics to characterize exposure in different tissues, very few PBPK models have been published for ADCs, none within the PK-Sim/MoBi software. To capture the pharmacokinetics (PK) of an anti-Claudin 18.2 ADC, a PBPK model was built in PK-Sim and MoBi and compared to observations from three clinical studies after intravenous (IV) administration in 109 patients with cancer. The PK parameters were considered inaccurate if the predicted error ratios were outside the two-fold error range (0.5-2). In PK-Sim, we defined one PBPK model comprising three compounds (ADC, payload, and naked antibody), which were mechanistically linked. This model captured the ADC PK profile. However, additional clearance mechanisms were essential to improve the fit of the ADC elimination phase. After integration of target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) and deconjugation of the payload in MoBi, 3 parameters were optimized for each of the ADC and the payload (degradation rate constant and reference concentration of the target, deconjugation rate constant, lipophilicity, nonspecific hepatic clearance rate constant and passive renal clearance of the payload). The PK data were adequately captured for both observed compounds, with a predicted error ratio within the two-fold range: C<sub>max</sub>_<sub>ADC</sub> (1.07-1.50), C<sub>max_Payload</sub> (0.56-1.18), AUC<sub>0-504h_ADC</sub> (0.73-1.23) and AUC<sub>0-504h_payload</sub> (0.77-1.37). The \\\"parameter optimization\\\" of different parameters allowed accurately capturing the observed data for both ADC and payload in cancer patients for an anti-Claudin 18.2 ADC. This analysis paves the way for PBPK modeling of other ADCs currently in development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗体-药物偶联物(adc)是一种很有前途的抗癌方法。尽管基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型在药物计量学中成为表征不同组织暴露的必要条件,但很少有针对adc的PBPK模型被发表,其中没有一个是在PK-Sim/MoBi软件中。为了捕获抗claudin 18.2 ADC的药代动力学(PK),在PK- sim和MoBi中建立了PBPK模型,并与109例癌症患者静脉注射后的3项临床研究的观察结果进行了比较。若预测误差率在2倍误差范围(0.5-2)之外,则认为PK参数不准确。在PK-Sim中,我们定义了一个由三种化合物(ADC、有效载荷和裸抗体)组成的PBPK模型,这三种化合物是机械连接的。该模型捕获了ADC PK配置文件。然而,额外的清除机制对于改善ADC消除阶段的拟合是必不可少的。在MoBi中整合靶介导药物处理(TMDD)和有效载荷解耦,对ADC和有效载荷分别优化3个参数(靶点降解速率常数和参考浓度、解耦速率常数、亲脂性、非特异性肝脏清除率常数和有效载荷被动肾清除率)。两种化合物的PK数据被充分捕获,预测误差率在两倍范围内:Cmax_ADC(1.07-1.50)、Cmax_Payload(0.56-1.18)、AUC0-504h_ADC(0.73-1.23)和AUC0-504h_payload(0.77-1.37)。不同参数的“参数优化”使得抗claudin 18.2 ADC能够准确地捕获癌症患者ADC和有效载荷的观察数据。这一分析为目前正在开发的其他adc的PBPK建模铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of a CLDN18.2 Targeted Antibody Drug Conjugate Pharmacokinetics in Cancer Patients Using PBPK Modeling and Simulation.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a promising anticancer approach. Although physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modeling became essential in Pharmacometrics to characterize exposure in different tissues, very few PBPK models have been published for ADCs, none within the PK-Sim/MoBi software. To capture the pharmacokinetics (PK) of an anti-Claudin 18.2 ADC, a PBPK model was built in PK-Sim and MoBi and compared to observations from three clinical studies after intravenous (IV) administration in 109 patients with cancer. The PK parameters were considered inaccurate if the predicted error ratios were outside the two-fold error range (0.5-2). In PK-Sim, we defined one PBPK model comprising three compounds (ADC, payload, and naked antibody), which were mechanistically linked. This model captured the ADC PK profile. However, additional clearance mechanisms were essential to improve the fit of the ADC elimination phase. After integration of target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) and deconjugation of the payload in MoBi, 3 parameters were optimized for each of the ADC and the payload (degradation rate constant and reference concentration of the target, deconjugation rate constant, lipophilicity, nonspecific hepatic clearance rate constant and passive renal clearance of the payload). The PK data were adequately captured for both observed compounds, with a predicted error ratio within the two-fold range: Cmax_ADC (1.07-1.50), Cmax_Payload (0.56-1.18), AUC0-504h_ADC (0.73-1.23) and AUC0-504h_payload (0.77-1.37). The "parameter optimization" of different parameters allowed accurately capturing the observed data for both ADC and payload in cancer patients for an anti-Claudin 18.2 ADC. This analysis paves the way for PBPK modeling of other ADCs currently in development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信