使用MyotonPRO测量颈部和背部肌肉力学性能的可靠性:系统综述

IF 1.4 Q3 REHABILITATION
Jakub Koterba, Edward Saulicz
{"title":"使用MyotonPRO测量颈部和背部肌肉力学性能的可靠性:系统综述","authors":"Jakub Koterba,&nbsp;Edward Saulicz","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.06.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>MyotonPRO allows for the non-invasive assessment of the mechanical properties of muscles (stiffness, tension and viscoelastic properties of the muscle). It has found use in various anatomical areas, including the neck and back. Since neck and back pain are common musculoskeletal complaints an accurate and reliable device is essential for accurate diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to review the literature to determine whether MyotonPRO device is a reliable tool for estimating mechanical properties of the neck and back muscles.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search was performed using PubMed, Science Direct and Pedro databases using the terms “MyotonPRO” and “reliability”. All studies, irrespective of the tests and methodologies employed, were included in this systematic review. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was classified as excellent (&gt;0.90), good (0.75–0.90), moderate (0.50–0.75), or poor (&lt;0.50).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen papers met the eligibility criteria. Intra-rater, inter-rater and time interval reliability were investigated in nine, nine and seven studies, respectively. Most of the outcomes (16) reported good to excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) &gt; 0.75) with exceptions for moderate to excellent (5 outcomes, ICC &gt;0.51) and poor to excellent (4 outcomes, ICC &gt; -0.15) regardless of participant gender, age, site of measurement or measured muscle. Overall ICC values ranged from −0.15 to 0.99 for intra-rater, inter-rater, and test-retest reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MyotonPRO device should be considered an effective measurement tool useful in testing the mechanical properties of soft tissues in the back and neck.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"44 ","pages":"Pages 616-624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of measurement of neck and back muscle mechanical properties using MyotonPRO: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Koterba,&nbsp;Edward Saulicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.06.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>MyotonPRO allows for the non-invasive assessment of the mechanical properties of muscles (stiffness, tension and viscoelastic properties of the muscle). It has found use in various anatomical areas, including the neck and back. Since neck and back pain are common musculoskeletal complaints an accurate and reliable device is essential for accurate diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to review the literature to determine whether MyotonPRO device is a reliable tool for estimating mechanical properties of the neck and back muscles.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search was performed using PubMed, Science Direct and Pedro databases using the terms “MyotonPRO” and “reliability”. All studies, irrespective of the tests and methodologies employed, were included in this systematic review. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was classified as excellent (&gt;0.90), good (0.75–0.90), moderate (0.50–0.75), or poor (&lt;0.50).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen papers met the eligibility criteria. Intra-rater, inter-rater and time interval reliability were investigated in nine, nine and seven studies, respectively. Most of the outcomes (16) reported good to excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) &gt; 0.75) with exceptions for moderate to excellent (5 outcomes, ICC &gt;0.51) and poor to excellent (4 outcomes, ICC &gt; -0.15) regardless of participant gender, age, site of measurement or measured muscle. Overall ICC values ranged from −0.15 to 0.99 for intra-rater, inter-rater, and test-retest reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MyotonPRO device should be considered an effective measurement tool useful in testing the mechanical properties of soft tissues in the back and neck.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 616-624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225002736\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225002736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

myotonpro允许对肌肉的机械性能(肌肉的刚度、张力和粘弹性)进行无创评估。它已被用于各种解剖区域,包括颈部和背部。由于颈部和背部疼痛是常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,因此准确可靠的设备对于准确诊断至关重要。目的本研究的目的是回顾文献,以确定MyotonPRO装置是否是评估颈部和背部肌肉力学性能的可靠工具。方法以“MyotonPRO”和“reliability”为检索词,使用PubMed、Science Direct和Pedro数据库进行文献检索。所有研究,无论采用何种试验和方法,均纳入本系统评价。类内相关系数(ICC)分为优秀(>0.90)、良好(0.75-0.90)、中等(0.50 - 0.75)和差(<0.50)。结果15篇论文符合入选标准。评估者内信度、评估者间信度和时间间隔信度分别在9项、9项和7项研究中进行了调查。大多数结果(16)报告了良好到极好的信度(类内相关系数(ICC) >;0.75),但中等至优秀(5个结果,ICC >0.51)和差至优秀(4个结果,ICC >;-0.15),无论参与者的性别、年龄、测量部位或测量肌肉。评估者内部、评估者之间和重测信度的总体ICC值范围为- 0.15至0.99。结论smyotonpro仪器是一种有效的测量仪器,可用于测试背部和颈部软组织的力学性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of measurement of neck and back muscle mechanical properties using MyotonPRO: A systematic review

Background

MyotonPRO allows for the non-invasive assessment of the mechanical properties of muscles (stiffness, tension and viscoelastic properties of the muscle). It has found use in various anatomical areas, including the neck and back. Since neck and back pain are common musculoskeletal complaints an accurate and reliable device is essential for accurate diagnosis.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to review the literature to determine whether MyotonPRO device is a reliable tool for estimating mechanical properties of the neck and back muscles.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Science Direct and Pedro databases using the terms “MyotonPRO” and “reliability”. All studies, irrespective of the tests and methodologies employed, were included in this systematic review. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was classified as excellent (>0.90), good (0.75–0.90), moderate (0.50–0.75), or poor (<0.50).

Results

Fifteen papers met the eligibility criteria. Intra-rater, inter-rater and time interval reliability were investigated in nine, nine and seven studies, respectively. Most of the outcomes (16) reported good to excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.75) with exceptions for moderate to excellent (5 outcomes, ICC >0.51) and poor to excellent (4 outcomes, ICC > -0.15) regardless of participant gender, age, site of measurement or measured muscle. Overall ICC values ranged from −0.15 to 0.99 for intra-rater, inter-rater, and test-retest reliability.

Conclusions

MyotonPRO device should be considered an effective measurement tool useful in testing the mechanical properties of soft tissues in the back and neck.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信