Bo Tang, Yuelun Zhang, Jia Gan, Lulu Ma, Yuguang Huang
{"title":"凝血酶原复合物浓缩液在非心脏手术中大量出血患者中的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Bo Tang, Yuelun Zhang, Jia Gan, Lulu Ma, Yuguang Huang","doi":"10.1177/10760296251356202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThe efficacy and safety of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in managing bleeding during non-cardiac surgery are unclear. We investigated the associations of 4F-PCC with postoperative RBC transfusion and adverse events in non-cardiac surgery patients with massive intraoperative bleeding.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study consecutively included non-cardiac surgery patients with massive intraoperative bleeding at a tertiary hospital (2014-2020). Administration of 4F-PCC was categorized into dose groups based on quartiles: 0 (reference), 2.8-6.7, 6.7-11.5, 11.5-19.4, and 19.4-87.5 IU/kg. Outcomes included postoperative RBC transfusion, major thromboembolic events, severe acute kidney injury, and lengths of ICU and hospital stay.ResultsOf 137 patients, 89 (65.0%) received 4F-PCC. The 6.7-11.5 IU/kg group were significantly associated with reduced postoperative RBC transfusion compared to the non-4F-PCC group (adjusted mean difference, -1.29 units; 95%CI, -2.55 to -0.04 units, <i>P</i> = 0.044). Such findings were not observed in other dose groups. Notably, the benefits were particularly significant in patients with preoperative platelet count ≥150 × 109/l (<i>P</i> = 0.031), and fibrinogen ≥3 g/l (<i>P</i> = 0.025). The 6.7-11.5 IU/kg group exhibited comparable incidences of major thromboembolic events (13.0% vs 10.4%) and severe acute kidney injury (8.7% vs 8.3%) compared to the non-4F-PCC group. The lengths of ICU and hospital stay were similar across groups.Conclusion4F-PCC may be associated with decreased postoperative RBC transfusion in non-cardiac surgery patients experiencing massive intraoperative bleeding, without a significant increase in the risk of major thromboembolic events. Randomized trials with stratified dosing are warranted to confirm efficacy, safety, and determine optimal doses.Clinical Trial NumberChiCTR2500096573.</p>","PeriodicalId":520590,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","volume":"31 ","pages":"10760296251356202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Prothrombin complex Concentrate in Patients with Massive Intraoperative Bleeding During non-Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bo Tang, Yuelun Zhang, Jia Gan, Lulu Ma, Yuguang Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10760296251356202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PurposeThe efficacy and safety of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in managing bleeding during non-cardiac surgery are unclear. We investigated the associations of 4F-PCC with postoperative RBC transfusion and adverse events in non-cardiac surgery patients with massive intraoperative bleeding.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study consecutively included non-cardiac surgery patients with massive intraoperative bleeding at a tertiary hospital (2014-2020). Administration of 4F-PCC was categorized into dose groups based on quartiles: 0 (reference), 2.8-6.7, 6.7-11.5, 11.5-19.4, and 19.4-87.5 IU/kg. Outcomes included postoperative RBC transfusion, major thromboembolic events, severe acute kidney injury, and lengths of ICU and hospital stay.ResultsOf 137 patients, 89 (65.0%) received 4F-PCC. The 6.7-11.5 IU/kg group were significantly associated with reduced postoperative RBC transfusion compared to the non-4F-PCC group (adjusted mean difference, -1.29 units; 95%CI, -2.55 to -0.04 units, <i>P</i> = 0.044). Such findings were not observed in other dose groups. Notably, the benefits were particularly significant in patients with preoperative platelet count ≥150 × 109/l (<i>P</i> = 0.031), and fibrinogen ≥3 g/l (<i>P</i> = 0.025). The 6.7-11.5 IU/kg group exhibited comparable incidences of major thromboembolic events (13.0% vs 10.4%) and severe acute kidney injury (8.7% vs 8.3%) compared to the non-4F-PCC group. The lengths of ICU and hospital stay were similar across groups.Conclusion4F-PCC may be associated with decreased postoperative RBC transfusion in non-cardiac surgery patients experiencing massive intraoperative bleeding, without a significant increase in the risk of major thromboembolic events. Randomized trials with stratified dosing are warranted to confirm efficacy, safety, and determine optimal doses.Clinical Trial NumberChiCTR2500096573.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"10760296251356202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227943/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296251356202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296251356202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and Safety of Prothrombin complex Concentrate in Patients with Massive Intraoperative Bleeding During non-Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
PurposeThe efficacy and safety of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in managing bleeding during non-cardiac surgery are unclear. We investigated the associations of 4F-PCC with postoperative RBC transfusion and adverse events in non-cardiac surgery patients with massive intraoperative bleeding.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study consecutively included non-cardiac surgery patients with massive intraoperative bleeding at a tertiary hospital (2014-2020). Administration of 4F-PCC was categorized into dose groups based on quartiles: 0 (reference), 2.8-6.7, 6.7-11.5, 11.5-19.4, and 19.4-87.5 IU/kg. Outcomes included postoperative RBC transfusion, major thromboembolic events, severe acute kidney injury, and lengths of ICU and hospital stay.ResultsOf 137 patients, 89 (65.0%) received 4F-PCC. The 6.7-11.5 IU/kg group were significantly associated with reduced postoperative RBC transfusion compared to the non-4F-PCC group (adjusted mean difference, -1.29 units; 95%CI, -2.55 to -0.04 units, P = 0.044). Such findings were not observed in other dose groups. Notably, the benefits were particularly significant in patients with preoperative platelet count ≥150 × 109/l (P = 0.031), and fibrinogen ≥3 g/l (P = 0.025). The 6.7-11.5 IU/kg group exhibited comparable incidences of major thromboembolic events (13.0% vs 10.4%) and severe acute kidney injury (8.7% vs 8.3%) compared to the non-4F-PCC group. The lengths of ICU and hospital stay were similar across groups.Conclusion4F-PCC may be associated with decreased postoperative RBC transfusion in non-cardiac surgery patients experiencing massive intraoperative bleeding, without a significant increase in the risk of major thromboembolic events. Randomized trials with stratified dosing are warranted to confirm efficacy, safety, and determine optimal doses.Clinical Trial NumberChiCTR2500096573.