初级保健中临床明显顽固性高血压的逐步管理:一项聚类随机对照试验。

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Birsen Kiliç, Marion C J Biermans, Michiel L Bots, Mark van der Wel, Wim J C de Grauw, Frans H Rutten, Monika Hollander
{"title":"初级保健中临床明显顽固性高血压的逐步管理:一项聚类随机对照试验。","authors":"Birsen Kiliç, Marion C J Biermans, Michiel L Bots, Mark van der Wel, Wim J C de Grauw, Frans H Rutten, Monika Hollander","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02885-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinically apparent resistant hypertension (CARH) is common and a major health problem because it increases the risk of cardiovascular events. We aim to assess whether a stepwise work-up management strategy for patients with CARH in primary care would result in better blood pressure control compared to usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT). General practitioners (GPs) from 22 practices (10 intervention arm; 12 usual care) recruited 106 patients aged 18-80 years who had an office blood pressure (BP) > 140/90 mmHg and were prescribed three or more antihypertensive drugs from different therapeutic classes for three or more months in an adequate dose. This study was conducted between October 2018 and June 2021. The intervention was a stepwise approach comprising of (i) 24-hour blood pressure measurements, (ii) dedicated attention on intake of blood pressure raising compounds, (iii) on lifestyle and on compliance to and (iv) optimalisation of medication, and (v) referral to specialist care, when appropriate. The control group received usual care. Primary outcome was the difference in 24-hours systolic BP between intervention and usual care measured at 8 months after baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neither 24-hour nor office systolic BP 8 months after baseline significantly differed between intervention and usual care arm: 136.9 mmHg versus 132.6 mmHg (p = 0.15) and 146.1 mmHg versus 147.6 mmHg (p = 0.51), respectively. No significant differences across groups were seen in number of prescribed BP lowering medication: 2.98 versus 3.11, or controlled hypertension after 8 months: 22% versus 28%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that a pragmatic, structured stepwise approach of CARH does not result in lower 24 h or office BP values compared to usual primary care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NTR7304 (www.trialregister.nl/trial/7099), May 4th, 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12218076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STEPWISE management of clinically apparent resistant hypertension in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Birsen Kiliç, Marion C J Biermans, Michiel L Bots, Mark van der Wel, Wim J C de Grauw, Frans H Rutten, Monika Hollander\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-025-02885-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinically apparent resistant hypertension (CARH) is common and a major health problem because it increases the risk of cardiovascular events. We aim to assess whether a stepwise work-up management strategy for patients with CARH in primary care would result in better blood pressure control compared to usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT). General practitioners (GPs) from 22 practices (10 intervention arm; 12 usual care) recruited 106 patients aged 18-80 years who had an office blood pressure (BP) > 140/90 mmHg and were prescribed three or more antihypertensive drugs from different therapeutic classes for three or more months in an adequate dose. This study was conducted between October 2018 and June 2021. The intervention was a stepwise approach comprising of (i) 24-hour blood pressure measurements, (ii) dedicated attention on intake of blood pressure raising compounds, (iii) on lifestyle and on compliance to and (iv) optimalisation of medication, and (v) referral to specialist care, when appropriate. The control group received usual care. Primary outcome was the difference in 24-hours systolic BP between intervention and usual care measured at 8 months after baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neither 24-hour nor office systolic BP 8 months after baseline significantly differed between intervention and usual care arm: 136.9 mmHg versus 132.6 mmHg (p = 0.15) and 146.1 mmHg versus 147.6 mmHg (p = 0.51), respectively. No significant differences across groups were seen in number of prescribed BP lowering medication: 2.98 versus 3.11, or controlled hypertension after 8 months: 22% versus 28%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that a pragmatic, structured stepwise approach of CARH does not result in lower 24 h or office BP values compared to usual primary care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NTR7304 (www.trialregister.nl/trial/7099), May 4th, 2018.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12218076/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02885-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02885-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床上明显的顽固性高血压(CARH)是一种常见的主要健康问题,因为它增加了心血管事件的风险。我们的目的是评估在初级保健中对CARH患者的逐步随访管理策略是否会比常规护理更好地控制血压。方法:一项实用的整群随机对照试验(cRCT)。来自22个诊所的全科医生(10个干预组;12常规护理)招募了106例年龄在18-80岁之间的患者,他们的办公室血压(BP)为bbb140 /90 mmHg,并从不同的治疗类别中开了三种或更多的降压药,以适当的剂量开了三个月或更长时间。这项研究于2018年10月至2021年6月进行。干预是一个循序渐进的方法,包括(i) 24小时血压测量,(ii)专门关注血压升高化合物的摄入,(iii)生活方式和依从性,(iv)优化药物,(v)适当时转诊到专科护理。对照组接受常规护理。主要结局是基线后8个月干预与常规治疗之间24小时收缩压的差异。结果:基线后8个月24小时和办公室收缩压在干预组和常规护理组之间均无显著差异:分别为136.9 mmHg对132.6 mmHg (p = 0.15)和146.1 mmHg对147.6 mmHg (p = 0.51)。在处方降压药物的数量方面,两组间无显著差异:2.98对3.11,8个月后高血压控制:22%对28%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与通常的初级保健相比,实用的、结构化的渐进式CARH方法不会导致24小时或办公室血压值降低。试验注册:NTR7304 (www.trialregister.nl/trial/7099), 2018年5月4日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

STEPWISE management of clinically apparent resistant hypertension in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

STEPWISE management of clinically apparent resistant hypertension in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

STEPWISE management of clinically apparent resistant hypertension in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Background: Clinically apparent resistant hypertension (CARH) is common and a major health problem because it increases the risk of cardiovascular events. We aim to assess whether a stepwise work-up management strategy for patients with CARH in primary care would result in better blood pressure control compared to usual care.

Methods: A pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT). General practitioners (GPs) from 22 practices (10 intervention arm; 12 usual care) recruited 106 patients aged 18-80 years who had an office blood pressure (BP) > 140/90 mmHg and were prescribed three or more antihypertensive drugs from different therapeutic classes for three or more months in an adequate dose. This study was conducted between October 2018 and June 2021. The intervention was a stepwise approach comprising of (i) 24-hour blood pressure measurements, (ii) dedicated attention on intake of blood pressure raising compounds, (iii) on lifestyle and on compliance to and (iv) optimalisation of medication, and (v) referral to specialist care, when appropriate. The control group received usual care. Primary outcome was the difference in 24-hours systolic BP between intervention and usual care measured at 8 months after baseline.

Results: Neither 24-hour nor office systolic BP 8 months after baseline significantly differed between intervention and usual care arm: 136.9 mmHg versus 132.6 mmHg (p = 0.15) and 146.1 mmHg versus 147.6 mmHg (p = 0.51), respectively. No significant differences across groups were seen in number of prescribed BP lowering medication: 2.98 versus 3.11, or controlled hypertension after 8 months: 22% versus 28%.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that a pragmatic, structured stepwise approach of CARH does not result in lower 24 h or office BP values compared to usual primary care.

Trial registration: NTR7304 (www.trialregister.nl/trial/7099), May 4th, 2018.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信