卫生专业人员体育活动咨询实践量表的编制:效度和信度研究。

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Musa Çankaya, Serdar Arslan, Gökmen Yapalı
{"title":"卫生专业人员体育活动咨询实践量表的编制:效度和信度研究。","authors":"Musa Çankaya, Serdar Arslan, Gökmen Yapalı","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02909-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim is to develop the scale of Physical Activity Counseling Practices (PACPS) in Turkish and validate it among health professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PACPS test-retest was applied to 162 health professionals (physician, physiotherapist, dietician, nurse) with a 1-week interval. Construct validity, correlations of PACPS with other scales were evaluated with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form (IPAQ), Conscious Behavioral Physical Activity Questionnaire (CBAPQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The content validity index value of the scale was found to be 0.76. The overall internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach α:0.917) was high. The item-total correlations of the scale are between 0.45 and 0.76.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study, it was determined that the PACPS scale has good internal consistency, test-retest validity and sufficient construct validity when compared with the IPAQ and CBAPQ.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the physical activity counseling practices scale in health professionals: a validity and reliability study.\",\"authors\":\"Musa Çankaya, Serdar Arslan, Gökmen Yapalı\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-025-02909-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim is to develop the scale of Physical Activity Counseling Practices (PACPS) in Turkish and validate it among health professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PACPS test-retest was applied to 162 health professionals (physician, physiotherapist, dietician, nurse) with a 1-week interval. Construct validity, correlations of PACPS with other scales were evaluated with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form (IPAQ), Conscious Behavioral Physical Activity Questionnaire (CBAPQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The content validity index value of the scale was found to be 0.76. The overall internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach α:0.917) was high. The item-total correlations of the scale are between 0.45 and 0.76.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study, it was determined that the PACPS scale has good internal consistency, test-retest validity and sufficient construct validity when compared with the IPAQ and CBAPQ.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219883/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02909-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02909-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目的是制定体育活动咨询实践(PACPS)的规模在土耳其和验证卫生专业人员。方法:对162名卫生专业人员(内科医生、物理治疗师、营养师、护士)进行PACPS复试,每隔1周进行一次复试。采用国际体育活动问卷简式(IPAQ)、有意识行为体育活动问卷(CBAPQ)评估PACPS量表的结构效度、与其他量表的相关性。结果:量表的内容效度指标值为0.76。量表整体内部一致性较高(Cronbach α:0.917)。量表的项目-总量相关性在0.45 ~ 0.76之间。结论:本研究确定PACPS量表与IPAQ和CBAPQ量表相比具有良好的内部一致性、重测效度和足够的结构效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of the physical activity counseling practices scale in health professionals: a validity and reliability study.

Development of the physical activity counseling practices scale in health professionals: a validity and reliability study.

Development of the physical activity counseling practices scale in health professionals: a validity and reliability study.

Development of the physical activity counseling practices scale in health professionals: a validity and reliability study.

Objective: The aim is to develop the scale of Physical Activity Counseling Practices (PACPS) in Turkish and validate it among health professionals.

Methods: PACPS test-retest was applied to 162 health professionals (physician, physiotherapist, dietician, nurse) with a 1-week interval. Construct validity, correlations of PACPS with other scales were evaluated with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form (IPAQ), Conscious Behavioral Physical Activity Questionnaire (CBAPQ).

Results: The content validity index value of the scale was found to be 0.76. The overall internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach α:0.917) was high. The item-total correlations of the scale are between 0.45 and 0.76.

Conclusion: This study, it was determined that the PACPS scale has good internal consistency, test-retest validity and sufficient construct validity when compared with the IPAQ and CBAPQ.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信