纯母乳喂养的预测因素:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mehri Kalhor, Mansoureh Yazdkhasti, Masoumeh Simbar, Sepideh Hajian, Zahra Kiani, Behjat Khorsandi, Mahtab Sattari, Zainab Ezadi, Haniyeh Nazem, Massoma Jafari
{"title":"纯母乳喂养的预测因素:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mehri Kalhor, Mansoureh Yazdkhasti, Masoumeh Simbar, Sepideh Hajian, Zahra Kiani, Behjat Khorsandi, Mahtab Sattari, Zainab Ezadi, Haniyeh Nazem, Massoma Jafari","doi":"10.1186/s13006-025-00744-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast milk is the ideal and complete food for infants. Demographic, social, economic and clinical factors affect exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). Identifying and understanding these factors can improve breastfeeding success. This study systematically reviews and analyzes the predictors of EBF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. we searched electronic databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar, SID, and Magiran. we examined articles published between 2000 to 2023 using keywords like \"risk factors\", \"related factors\", \"predictive factors\", \"exclusive breastfeeding \", and \"women\". The review included observational studies. Two reviewers independently selected the studies extracted data. Quality assessment was based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The association between predictive factors and breastfeeding was combined in a meta-analysis using a restricted maximum likelihood method (REML). Heterogeneity was quantified using I<sup>2</sup> and investigated through meta-regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses, while publication bias was assessed via a funnel plot.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Thirty eight articles were included in this review. Predictive factors in EBF were categorized into seven groups: mother's awareness of breastfeeding benefits, support received in breastfeeding and child-rearing, early breastfeeding after birth, mother's education level, annual income, mother's age, and prenatal care. Nineteen articles with a sample size of 70,183 were included in the meta-analysis. Results showed that a mother's awareness of breastfeeding benefits increases the odds of EBF by 2.70 times, support in child-rearing by 2.57 times, early breastfeeding (< 24 h) by 1.853 times, higher education level by 1.44 times, self-efficacy by 1.067, multiparity ≥ 2 by 1.50 times, having upper-middle annual income was associated with 28.3% higher than odds of EBF (95% CI 1.68, 1.54), female sex of infant by 1.07 times, and one to three antenatal visits by 0.108 times, (95% CI 1.27, 4.18). In normal vaginal delivery (NVD), the odds increased 2.22 fold, all statistically significant (95% CI 0.91, 5.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The maternal awareness of the benefits of breastfeeding, maternal support, early breastfeeding, high education level, and improved family economic conditions are associated with EBF. Therefore, improving the educational, social, and economic levels of mothers improves EBF.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023483049.</p>","PeriodicalId":54266,"journal":{"name":"International Breastfeeding Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mehri Kalhor, Mansoureh Yazdkhasti, Masoumeh Simbar, Sepideh Hajian, Zahra Kiani, Behjat Khorsandi, Mahtab Sattari, Zainab Ezadi, Haniyeh Nazem, Massoma Jafari\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13006-025-00744-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast milk is the ideal and complete food for infants. Demographic, social, economic and clinical factors affect exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). Identifying and understanding these factors can improve breastfeeding success. This study systematically reviews and analyzes the predictors of EBF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. we searched electronic databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar, SID, and Magiran. we examined articles published between 2000 to 2023 using keywords like \\\"risk factors\\\", \\\"related factors\\\", \\\"predictive factors\\\", \\\"exclusive breastfeeding \\\", and \\\"women\\\". The review included observational studies. Two reviewers independently selected the studies extracted data. Quality assessment was based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The association between predictive factors and breastfeeding was combined in a meta-analysis using a restricted maximum likelihood method (REML). Heterogeneity was quantified using I<sup>2</sup> and investigated through meta-regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses, while publication bias was assessed via a funnel plot.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Thirty eight articles were included in this review. Predictive factors in EBF were categorized into seven groups: mother's awareness of breastfeeding benefits, support received in breastfeeding and child-rearing, early breastfeeding after birth, mother's education level, annual income, mother's age, and prenatal care. Nineteen articles with a sample size of 70,183 were included in the meta-analysis. Results showed that a mother's awareness of breastfeeding benefits increases the odds of EBF by 2.70 times, support in child-rearing by 2.57 times, early breastfeeding (< 24 h) by 1.853 times, higher education level by 1.44 times, self-efficacy by 1.067, multiparity ≥ 2 by 1.50 times, having upper-middle annual income was associated with 28.3% higher than odds of EBF (95% CI 1.68, 1.54), female sex of infant by 1.07 times, and one to three antenatal visits by 0.108 times, (95% CI 1.27, 4.18). In normal vaginal delivery (NVD), the odds increased 2.22 fold, all statistically significant (95% CI 0.91, 5.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The maternal awareness of the benefits of breastfeeding, maternal support, early breastfeeding, high education level, and improved family economic conditions are associated with EBF. Therefore, improving the educational, social, and economic levels of mothers improves EBF.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023483049.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Breastfeeding Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224592/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Breastfeeding Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00744-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Breastfeeding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00744-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:母乳是婴儿最理想、最完整的食物。人口、社会、经济和临床因素影响纯母乳喂养(EBF)。识别和了解这些因素可以提高母乳喂养的成功率。本研究系统地回顾和分析了EBF的预测因素。方法:本研究采用系统综述和荟萃分析。我们检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、Web of Science、PsycINFO、Cochrane、Scopus、EMBASE、谷歌Scholar、SID和Magiran等电子数据库。我们研究了2000年至2023年间发表的文章,关键词包括“风险因素”、“相关因素”、“预测因素”、“纯母乳喂养”和“女性”。该综述包括观察性研究。两名审稿人独立选择了研究提取的数据。质量评估基于纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表。使用限制性最大似然法(REML)将预测因素与母乳喂养之间的关联结合起来进行荟萃分析。异质性采用I2进行量化,并通过meta回归、亚组和敏感性分析进行调查,发表偏倚通过漏斗图进行评估。结果:本综述共纳入38篇文章。EBF的预测因素分为7组:母亲对母乳喂养益处的认识、在母乳喂养和育儿方面获得的支持、出生后早期母乳喂养、母亲受教育程度、年收入、母亲年龄和产前护理。19篇样本量为70,183的文章被纳入meta分析。结果表明,母亲对母乳喂养益处的认识使婴儿发生EBF的几率增加2.70倍,对育儿的支持增加2.57倍,早期母乳喂养增加2.57倍。结论:母亲对母乳喂养益处的认识、母亲的支持、早期母乳喂养、较高的文化程度和改善的家庭经济条件与EBF有关。因此,提高母亲的教育、社会和经济水平可以改善EBF。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42023483049。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Breast milk is the ideal and complete food for infants. Demographic, social, economic and clinical factors affect exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). Identifying and understanding these factors can improve breastfeeding success. This study systematically reviews and analyzes the predictors of EBF.

Methods: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. we searched electronic databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar, SID, and Magiran. we examined articles published between 2000 to 2023 using keywords like "risk factors", "related factors", "predictive factors", "exclusive breastfeeding ", and "women". The review included observational studies. Two reviewers independently selected the studies extracted data. Quality assessment was based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The association between predictive factors and breastfeeding was combined in a meta-analysis using a restricted maximum likelihood method (REML). Heterogeneity was quantified using I2 and investigated through meta-regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses, while publication bias was assessed via a funnel plot.

Result: Thirty eight articles were included in this review. Predictive factors in EBF were categorized into seven groups: mother's awareness of breastfeeding benefits, support received in breastfeeding and child-rearing, early breastfeeding after birth, mother's education level, annual income, mother's age, and prenatal care. Nineteen articles with a sample size of 70,183 were included in the meta-analysis. Results showed that a mother's awareness of breastfeeding benefits increases the odds of EBF by 2.70 times, support in child-rearing by 2.57 times, early breastfeeding (< 24 h) by 1.853 times, higher education level by 1.44 times, self-efficacy by 1.067, multiparity ≥ 2 by 1.50 times, having upper-middle annual income was associated with 28.3% higher than odds of EBF (95% CI 1.68, 1.54), female sex of infant by 1.07 times, and one to three antenatal visits by 0.108 times, (95% CI 1.27, 4.18). In normal vaginal delivery (NVD), the odds increased 2.22 fold, all statistically significant (95% CI 0.91, 5.43).

Conclusion: The maternal awareness of the benefits of breastfeeding, maternal support, early breastfeeding, high education level, and improved family economic conditions are associated with EBF. Therefore, improving the educational, social, and economic levels of mothers improves EBF.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023483049.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Breastfeeding Journal
International Breastfeeding Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding is recognized as an important public health issue with enormous social and economic implications. Infants who do not receive breast milk are likely to experience poorer health outcomes than breastfed infants; mothers who do not breastfeed increase their own health risks. Publications on the topic of breastfeeding are wide ranging. Articles about breastfeeding are currently published journals focused on nursing, midwifery, paediatric, obstetric, family medicine, public health, immunology, physiology, sociology and many other topics. In addition, electronic publishing allows fast publication time for authors and Open Access ensures the journal is easily accessible to readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信