双重资格特殊需要计划的登记和取消登记率。

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
David J Meyers, Eliza Macneal, Kendra Offiaeli, Eric T Roberts
{"title":"双重资格特殊需要计划的登记和取消登记率。","authors":"David J Meyers, Eliza Macneal, Kendra Offiaeli, Eric T Roberts","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Medicare beneficiaries dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid have some of the highest care needs. Finding ways to support dually eligible beneficiaries in the Medicare Advantage (MA) program has become a policy goal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if enrollment in different MA plan types is associated with differences in disenrollment.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study included Medicare enrollment data from dually eligible Medicare beneficiaries in 2021. Analyses were conducted between March 2024 and February 2025. Data were analyzed from January through March 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Enrollment in different MA plan types, including those that exclusively serve dual-eligible beneficiaries (coordination-only, dual-eligible special needs plans [D-SNPs] and fully integrated D-SNPs [FIDE-SNPs]), standard MA plans that serve dual-eligible and non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, and D-SNP look-alike plans, defined as standard MA plans that primarily enroll dual-eligible beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>One-year disenrollment from one plan to another or to traditional Medicare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2 698 434 dually eligible beneficiaries in 2021, the mean (SD) age was 66.9 (14.1) years, and 62.5% were female individuals. Of dual-eligible beneficiaries enrolled in FIDE-SNPs in 2021, 19 001 (8.1%) disenrolled by 2022. Of those enrolled in coordination-only D-SNPs, D-SNP look-alikes, and standard MA plans in 2021, disenrollment rates were 18.3%, 30.5%, and 28.2%, respectively. Disenrollment rates were higher for Black beneficiaries and those who used more health services, including inpatient stays and more days of nursing home care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that FIDE-SNPs retained their members at higher rates, which could be a sign of improved care experiences. Understanding how FIDE-SNPs may be affecting patient care will be important moving forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 7","pages":"e251748"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enrollment in Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans and Disenrollment Rates.\",\"authors\":\"David J Meyers, Eliza Macneal, Kendra Offiaeli, Eric T Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Medicare beneficiaries dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid have some of the highest care needs. Finding ways to support dually eligible beneficiaries in the Medicare Advantage (MA) program has become a policy goal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if enrollment in different MA plan types is associated with differences in disenrollment.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study included Medicare enrollment data from dually eligible Medicare beneficiaries in 2021. Analyses were conducted between March 2024 and February 2025. Data were analyzed from January through March 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Enrollment in different MA plan types, including those that exclusively serve dual-eligible beneficiaries (coordination-only, dual-eligible special needs plans [D-SNPs] and fully integrated D-SNPs [FIDE-SNPs]), standard MA plans that serve dual-eligible and non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, and D-SNP look-alike plans, defined as standard MA plans that primarily enroll dual-eligible beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>One-year disenrollment from one plan to another or to traditional Medicare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2 698 434 dually eligible beneficiaries in 2021, the mean (SD) age was 66.9 (14.1) years, and 62.5% were female individuals. Of dual-eligible beneficiaries enrolled in FIDE-SNPs in 2021, 19 001 (8.1%) disenrolled by 2022. Of those enrolled in coordination-only D-SNPs, D-SNP look-alikes, and standard MA plans in 2021, disenrollment rates were 18.3%, 30.5%, and 28.2%, respectively. Disenrollment rates were higher for Black beneficiaries and those who used more health services, including inpatient stays and more days of nursing home care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that FIDE-SNPs retained their members at higher rates, which could be a sign of improved care experiences. Understanding how FIDE-SNPs may be affecting patient care will be important moving forward.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 7\",\"pages\":\"e251748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:医疗保险受益人在医疗保险和医疗补助双重登记有一些最高的护理需求。寻找方法支持医疗保险优势(MA)计划的双重合格受益人已成为一项政策目标。目的:确定参加不同MA计划类型是否与退保差异相关。设计、设置和参与者:本横断面研究纳入了2021年双重合格医疗保险受益人的医疗保险登记数据。分析在2024年3月至2025年2月期间进行。研究人员分析了2025年1月至3月的数据。暴露:不同MA计划类型的登记,包括专门为双重合格受益人服务的计划(仅协调,双重合格特殊需要计划[D-SNP]和完全整合的D-SNP [fide - snp]),为双重合格和非双重合格受益人服务的标准MA计划,以及D-SNP相似计划,定义为主要招收双重合格受益人的标准MA计划。主要结果和措施:一年之内从一个计划退出到另一个计划或传统医疗保险。结果:2021年2名 698 434名双重符合条件的受益人中,平均(SD)年龄为66.9(14.1)岁,女性占62.5%。在2021年加入fide - snp的双重资格受益人中,19 001(8.1%)在2022年退出。在2021年参加仅协调D-SNP, D-SNP相似和标准MA计划的患者中,退出率分别为18.3%,30.5%和28.2%。黑人受益人和那些使用更多医疗服务的人,包括住院和在养老院护理的时间更长,退出登记的比率更高。结论和相关性:本横断面研究的结果表明,fide - snp保留其成员的比率较高,这可能是改善护理经验的标志。了解fide - snp如何影响患者护理将是向前发展的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enrollment in Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans and Disenrollment Rates.

Importance: Medicare beneficiaries dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid have some of the highest care needs. Finding ways to support dually eligible beneficiaries in the Medicare Advantage (MA) program has become a policy goal.

Objective: To determine if enrollment in different MA plan types is associated with differences in disenrollment.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study included Medicare enrollment data from dually eligible Medicare beneficiaries in 2021. Analyses were conducted between March 2024 and February 2025. Data were analyzed from January through March 2025.

Exposure: Enrollment in different MA plan types, including those that exclusively serve dual-eligible beneficiaries (coordination-only, dual-eligible special needs plans [D-SNPs] and fully integrated D-SNPs [FIDE-SNPs]), standard MA plans that serve dual-eligible and non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, and D-SNP look-alike plans, defined as standard MA plans that primarily enroll dual-eligible beneficiaries.

Main outcomes and measures: One-year disenrollment from one plan to another or to traditional Medicare.

Results: Among 2 698 434 dually eligible beneficiaries in 2021, the mean (SD) age was 66.9 (14.1) years, and 62.5% were female individuals. Of dual-eligible beneficiaries enrolled in FIDE-SNPs in 2021, 19 001 (8.1%) disenrolled by 2022. Of those enrolled in coordination-only D-SNPs, D-SNP look-alikes, and standard MA plans in 2021, disenrollment rates were 18.3%, 30.5%, and 28.2%, respectively. Disenrollment rates were higher for Black beneficiaries and those who used more health services, including inpatient stays and more days of nursing home care.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that FIDE-SNPs retained their members at higher rates, which could be a sign of improved care experiences. Understanding how FIDE-SNPs may be affecting patient care will be important moving forward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信