通过资源受限环境下的购买安排来提高慢性病护理的质量:来自国际德尔菲调查的见解。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Health Action Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1080/16549716.2025.2518667
Bruno Meessen, Megumi Rosenberg, Grace Marie V Ku
{"title":"通过资源受限环境下的购买安排来提高慢性病护理的质量:来自国际德尔菲调查的见解。","authors":"Bruno Meessen, Megumi Rosenberg, Grace Marie V Ku","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2025.2518667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are substantial issues with the quality of care (QoC) received by persons living with chronic conditions, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). One possible channel to improve QoC is through financing, specifically purchasing arrangements for health services. This has been actively explored in high-income country settings, generating a growing body of scientific knowledge.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the potential and the constraints of using purchasing arrangements as a way to improve QoC for chronic conditions in resource-constrained settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi survey was conducted with 49 international participants with content expertise in chronic care management, health financing, or both, and context expertise in resource-constrained settings including in Small Island Developing States or Fragile and Conflict-Affected States, to assess the possible contribution of purchasing arrangements to QoC for chronic conditions with respect to specific types of care providers (e.g. patients and relatives, community health workers, public health centres), decentralized coordination bodies and purchasing agencies in such settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a high level of consensus among the Delphi panel in favour of considering purchasing arrangements as one of the levers to improve QoC for people living with chronic conditions. Specific directions for action were identified along with their caveats.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The challenge of improving the quality of chronic care in resource-constrained settings is extensive and requires immediate attention. Leveraging purchasing arrangements is one promising channel to strengthen quality chronic care in such settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"18 1","pages":"2518667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the quality of chronic care through purchasing arrangements in resource-constrained settings: insights from an international Delphi survey.\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Meessen, Megumi Rosenberg, Grace Marie V Ku\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16549716.2025.2518667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are substantial issues with the quality of care (QoC) received by persons living with chronic conditions, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). One possible channel to improve QoC is through financing, specifically purchasing arrangements for health services. This has been actively explored in high-income country settings, generating a growing body of scientific knowledge.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the potential and the constraints of using purchasing arrangements as a way to improve QoC for chronic conditions in resource-constrained settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi survey was conducted with 49 international participants with content expertise in chronic care management, health financing, or both, and context expertise in resource-constrained settings including in Small Island Developing States or Fragile and Conflict-Affected States, to assess the possible contribution of purchasing arrangements to QoC for chronic conditions with respect to specific types of care providers (e.g. patients and relatives, community health workers, public health centres), decentralized coordination bodies and purchasing agencies in such settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a high level of consensus among the Delphi panel in favour of considering purchasing arrangements as one of the levers to improve QoC for people living with chronic conditions. Specific directions for action were identified along with their caveats.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The challenge of improving the quality of chronic care in resource-constrained settings is extensive and requires immediate attention. Leveraging purchasing arrangements is one promising channel to strengthen quality chronic care in such settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Action\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2518667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231291/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2518667\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2518667","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性病患者接受的护理质量(QoC)存在重大问题,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。改善质量体系的一个可能渠道是通过融资,特别是保健服务的采购安排。高收入国家对此进行了积极探索,产生了越来越多的科学知识。目的:了解在资源受限的情况下,使用采购安排作为改善慢性病质量的一种方式的潜力和限制。方法:对49名国际参与者进行了德尔菲调查,这些参与者具有慢性病护理管理、卫生筹资或两者兼有的内容专业知识,以及小岛屿发展中国家或脆弱和受冲突影响国家等资源受限环境下的情境专业知识,以评估采购安排对慢性病质量控制的可能贡献,涉及特定类型的护理提供者(例如患者和亲属、社区卫生工作者、公共卫生中心)、权力下放的协调机构和此类机构的采购机构。结果:在德尔菲小组中,赞成将购买安排作为改善慢性病患者QoC的杠杆之一的共识程度很高。确定了具体的行动方向及其注意事项。结论:在资源有限的环境中,提高慢性护理质量的挑战是广泛的,需要立即关注。利用采购安排是在这些环境中加强高质量慢性护理的一个有希望的渠道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the quality of chronic care through purchasing arrangements in resource-constrained settings: insights from an international Delphi survey.

Background: There are substantial issues with the quality of care (QoC) received by persons living with chronic conditions, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). One possible channel to improve QoC is through financing, specifically purchasing arrangements for health services. This has been actively explored in high-income country settings, generating a growing body of scientific knowledge.

Objective: To understand the potential and the constraints of using purchasing arrangements as a way to improve QoC for chronic conditions in resource-constrained settings.

Methods: A Delphi survey was conducted with 49 international participants with content expertise in chronic care management, health financing, or both, and context expertise in resource-constrained settings including in Small Island Developing States or Fragile and Conflict-Affected States, to assess the possible contribution of purchasing arrangements to QoC for chronic conditions with respect to specific types of care providers (e.g. patients and relatives, community health workers, public health centres), decentralized coordination bodies and purchasing agencies in such settings.

Results: There was a high level of consensus among the Delphi panel in favour of considering purchasing arrangements as one of the levers to improve QoC for people living with chronic conditions. Specific directions for action were identified along with their caveats.

Conclusions: The challenge of improving the quality of chronic care in resource-constrained settings is extensive and requires immediate attention. Leveraging purchasing arrangements is one promising channel to strengthen quality chronic care in such settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Action
Global Health Action PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research. Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health. Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信