安宁疗护社区服务重新设计之实施:确定经验教训之定性研究。

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524251349839
Kate Sugar, Candy McCabe, Alison Llewellyn, Wayne de Leeuw, Maggie Crowe, Claire Prendergast, Charlotte Spence, Natasha Bradley
{"title":"安宁疗护社区服务重新设计之实施:确定经验教训之定性研究。","authors":"Kate Sugar, Candy McCabe, Alison Llewellyn, Wayne de Leeuw, Maggie Crowe, Claire Prendergast, Charlotte Spence, Natasha Bradley","doi":"10.1177/26323524251349839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The need to improve equity of access to palliative care is well recognized; however, much less is known about how new models of hospice community services can be successfully introduced.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to capture learning from the implementation experiences of hospice stakeholders during the first 12 months of a hospice community services redesign.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative research using individual semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 38) and follow-up focus groups (<i>n</i> = 8).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were clinical and non-clinical staff, hospice leaders, volunteers, and external stakeholders. Interviews were analysed with framework analysis using Normalisation Process Theory. Focus groups were used to confirm and prioritise recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation is more likely to be successful where hospice personnel are enabled to work together in understanding and adapting to new ways of working. Participants gave examples of being supported to plan activities, to form networks of participation, to pilot new ways of working, and to appraise and improve their work. Receiving feedback on progress is beneficial. Implementation strategies that are tailored to each context could be effective if they engage with hospice stakeholders to ensure that strategic aims are well-understood and that the necessary resources are available. Positive experiences of implementation are more likely where stakeholders understand the changes and can participate in planning. Where necessary, changes to human resources and technology support systems would ideally be adopted prior to making changes to patient-facing services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study contributes knowledge from a charitable provider of specialist palliative care during the implementation of a hospice community service redesign. We identified opportunities for future improvement, particularly regarding communication, planning, prioritisation, and feedback. Investment of time and reflection during implementation can support the ambition of hospices to become integrated within a place-based system, to improve access to palliative care within the communities they serve. We report key implementation recommendations for organisations considering service redesign.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"19 ","pages":"26323524251349839"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a hospice community service redesign: Qualitative research identifying lessons learned.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Sugar, Candy McCabe, Alison Llewellyn, Wayne de Leeuw, Maggie Crowe, Claire Prendergast, Charlotte Spence, Natasha Bradley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26323524251349839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The need to improve equity of access to palliative care is well recognized; however, much less is known about how new models of hospice community services can be successfully introduced.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to capture learning from the implementation experiences of hospice stakeholders during the first 12 months of a hospice community services redesign.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative research using individual semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 38) and follow-up focus groups (<i>n</i> = 8).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were clinical and non-clinical staff, hospice leaders, volunteers, and external stakeholders. Interviews were analysed with framework analysis using Normalisation Process Theory. Focus groups were used to confirm and prioritise recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation is more likely to be successful where hospice personnel are enabled to work together in understanding and adapting to new ways of working. Participants gave examples of being supported to plan activities, to form networks of participation, to pilot new ways of working, and to appraise and improve their work. Receiving feedback on progress is beneficial. Implementation strategies that are tailored to each context could be effective if they engage with hospice stakeholders to ensure that strategic aims are well-understood and that the necessary resources are available. Positive experiences of implementation are more likely where stakeholders understand the changes and can participate in planning. Where necessary, changes to human resources and technology support systems would ideally be adopted prior to making changes to patient-facing services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study contributes knowledge from a charitable provider of specialist palliative care during the implementation of a hospice community service redesign. We identified opportunities for future improvement, particularly regarding communication, planning, prioritisation, and feedback. Investment of time and reflection during implementation can support the ambition of hospices to become integrated within a place-based system, to improve access to palliative care within the communities they serve. We report key implementation recommendations for organisations considering service redesign.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"26323524251349839\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214322/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524251349839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524251349839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:改善公平获得姑息治疗的必要性已得到充分认识;然而,人们对如何成功地引入新的临终关怀社区服务模式知之甚少。目的:我们的目标是在安宁疗护社区服务重新设计的前12个月,从安宁疗护利益相关者的实施经验中获取学习。设计:采用个体半结构化访谈(n = 38)和随访焦点小组(n = 8)进行定性研究。方法:研究对象为临床和非临床工作人员、安宁疗护负责人、志愿者和外部利益相关者。访谈采用规范化过程理论框架分析。焦点小组被用来确认和确定建议的优先顺序。结果:当安宁疗护人员能够在理解和适应新的工作方式中一起工作时,实施更有可能成功。与会者举例说明了在规划活动、形成参与网络、试验新的工作方式以及评价和改进其工作方面得到的支持。收到进度反馈是有益的。如果与安宁疗护利益相关者合作,以确保战略目标得到充分理解,并获得必要的资源,针对每种情况量身定制的实施策略可能是有效的。当利益相关者理解变更并能参与规划时,实施的积极体验更有可能实现。如有必要,最好先对人力资源和技术支持系统进行改革,然后再对面向患者的服务进行改革。结论:本研究为安宁疗护社区服务重新设计的实施提供了专业缓和疗护慈善提供者的知识。我们确定了未来改进的机会,特别是在沟通、计划、优先排序和反馈方面。在实施过程中投入时间和进行反思,可以支持安宁疗护院融入到基于地点的系统中,以改善其所服务的社区获得姑息治疗的机会。我们为考虑重新设计服务的组织报告关键实施建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of a hospice community service redesign: Qualitative research identifying lessons learned.

Background: The need to improve equity of access to palliative care is well recognized; however, much less is known about how new models of hospice community services can be successfully introduced.

Aim: We aimed to capture learning from the implementation experiences of hospice stakeholders during the first 12 months of a hospice community services redesign.

Design: Qualitative research using individual semi-structured interviews (n = 38) and follow-up focus groups (n = 8).

Methods: Participants were clinical and non-clinical staff, hospice leaders, volunteers, and external stakeholders. Interviews were analysed with framework analysis using Normalisation Process Theory. Focus groups were used to confirm and prioritise recommendations.

Results: Implementation is more likely to be successful where hospice personnel are enabled to work together in understanding and adapting to new ways of working. Participants gave examples of being supported to plan activities, to form networks of participation, to pilot new ways of working, and to appraise and improve their work. Receiving feedback on progress is beneficial. Implementation strategies that are tailored to each context could be effective if they engage with hospice stakeholders to ensure that strategic aims are well-understood and that the necessary resources are available. Positive experiences of implementation are more likely where stakeholders understand the changes and can participate in planning. Where necessary, changes to human resources and technology support systems would ideally be adopted prior to making changes to patient-facing services.

Conclusion: This study contributes knowledge from a charitable provider of specialist palliative care during the implementation of a hospice community service redesign. We identified opportunities for future improvement, particularly regarding communication, planning, prioritisation, and feedback. Investment of time and reflection during implementation can support the ambition of hospices to become integrated within a place-based system, to improve access to palliative care within the communities they serve. We report key implementation recommendations for organisations considering service redesign.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信