Kaveh Vahdani, Katharina Kampik, Jimmy M Uddin, David H Verity, Geoffrey E Rose
{"title":"单眼外肌明显增大:预测恶性肿瘤的临床和影像学模式。","authors":"Kaveh Vahdani, Katharina Kampik, Jimmy M Uddin, David H Verity, Geoffrey E Rose","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate clinical presentation, imaging patterns, histopathology, and predictors of malignancy in patients with enlargement of a single extraocular muscle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review, with imaging categorized into 3 groups: single-muscle only (SMO), single excessively-enlarged muscle, and single-muscle with lacrimal gland enlargement (SMLG). Histopathology was classified as specific or nonspecific myositis, atypical thyroid eye disease, malignancy, or other diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 142 patients (54% female), 60/142 (43%) had SMO, 53 (37%) single excessively-enlarged muscle, and 29 (20%) single-muscle with lacrimal gland. The commonest diagnoses were myositis (43%), atypical thyroid eye disease (27%), and malignancy (27%). Malignancy-mainly lymphoma or metastases-was commonest in SMO (43%), while atypical thyroid eye disease predominated in single excessively-enlarged muscle (49%), and myositis in the single-muscle with lacrimal gland group (69%). From univariate analysis, predictors of malignancy included age ≥60 years (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6; p = 0.012), prior malignancy (OR: 15.6; p < 0.001), subjective visual impairment (OR: 3.5; p = 0.024), LogMAR ≥0.5 (OR: 9.0; p = 0.009), ≥3 mm relative exophthalmos (OR: 3.1; p = 0.008), SMO (OR: 4.8; p < 0.001), lateral rectus involvement (OR: 3.7; p = 0.008), the \"amphora sign\" (OR: 28.2; p < 0.001), and maximum muscle diameter ≥10 mm (OR: 35.5; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed prior malignancy (OR: 27.7; p = 0.013) and muscle diameter ≥10 mm (OR: 24.8; p = 0.005) as independent predictive variables. The prevalence of pain or diplopia and symptom duration were not significantly different in patients with myositis or those with malignancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Excessive enlargement of a single extraocular muscle poses a diagnostic challenge due to the overlap of inflammatory and neoplastic features. Given the substantial proportion of malignancies, a high index of suspicion and early biopsy should be considered, particularly with SMO, a muscle diameter ≥10 mm, or prior history of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marked Enlargement of a Single Extraocular Muscle: Clinical and Imaging Patterns in the Prediction of Malignancy.\",\"authors\":\"Kaveh Vahdani, Katharina Kampik, Jimmy M Uddin, David H Verity, Geoffrey E Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate clinical presentation, imaging patterns, histopathology, and predictors of malignancy in patients with enlargement of a single extraocular muscle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review, with imaging categorized into 3 groups: single-muscle only (SMO), single excessively-enlarged muscle, and single-muscle with lacrimal gland enlargement (SMLG). Histopathology was classified as specific or nonspecific myositis, atypical thyroid eye disease, malignancy, or other diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 142 patients (54% female), 60/142 (43%) had SMO, 53 (37%) single excessively-enlarged muscle, and 29 (20%) single-muscle with lacrimal gland. The commonest diagnoses were myositis (43%), atypical thyroid eye disease (27%), and malignancy (27%). Malignancy-mainly lymphoma or metastases-was commonest in SMO (43%), while atypical thyroid eye disease predominated in single excessively-enlarged muscle (49%), and myositis in the single-muscle with lacrimal gland group (69%). From univariate analysis, predictors of malignancy included age ≥60 years (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6; p = 0.012), prior malignancy (OR: 15.6; p < 0.001), subjective visual impairment (OR: 3.5; p = 0.024), LogMAR ≥0.5 (OR: 9.0; p = 0.009), ≥3 mm relative exophthalmos (OR: 3.1; p = 0.008), SMO (OR: 4.8; p < 0.001), lateral rectus involvement (OR: 3.7; p = 0.008), the \\\"amphora sign\\\" (OR: 28.2; p < 0.001), and maximum muscle diameter ≥10 mm (OR: 35.5; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed prior malignancy (OR: 27.7; p = 0.013) and muscle diameter ≥10 mm (OR: 24.8; p = 0.005) as independent predictive variables. The prevalence of pain or diplopia and symptom duration were not significantly different in patients with myositis or those with malignancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Excessive enlargement of a single extraocular muscle poses a diagnostic challenge due to the overlap of inflammatory and neoplastic features. Given the substantial proportion of malignancies, a high index of suspicion and early biopsy should be considered, particularly with SMO, a muscle diameter ≥10 mm, or prior history of cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002988\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Marked Enlargement of a Single Extraocular Muscle: Clinical and Imaging Patterns in the Prediction of Malignancy.
Purpose: To evaluate clinical presentation, imaging patterns, histopathology, and predictors of malignancy in patients with enlargement of a single extraocular muscle.
Methods: Retrospective review, with imaging categorized into 3 groups: single-muscle only (SMO), single excessively-enlarged muscle, and single-muscle with lacrimal gland enlargement (SMLG). Histopathology was classified as specific or nonspecific myositis, atypical thyroid eye disease, malignancy, or other diagnosis.
Results: Among 142 patients (54% female), 60/142 (43%) had SMO, 53 (37%) single excessively-enlarged muscle, and 29 (20%) single-muscle with lacrimal gland. The commonest diagnoses were myositis (43%), atypical thyroid eye disease (27%), and malignancy (27%). Malignancy-mainly lymphoma or metastases-was commonest in SMO (43%), while atypical thyroid eye disease predominated in single excessively-enlarged muscle (49%), and myositis in the single-muscle with lacrimal gland group (69%). From univariate analysis, predictors of malignancy included age ≥60 years (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6; p = 0.012), prior malignancy (OR: 15.6; p < 0.001), subjective visual impairment (OR: 3.5; p = 0.024), LogMAR ≥0.5 (OR: 9.0; p = 0.009), ≥3 mm relative exophthalmos (OR: 3.1; p = 0.008), SMO (OR: 4.8; p < 0.001), lateral rectus involvement (OR: 3.7; p = 0.008), the "amphora sign" (OR: 28.2; p < 0.001), and maximum muscle diameter ≥10 mm (OR: 35.5; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed prior malignancy (OR: 27.7; p = 0.013) and muscle diameter ≥10 mm (OR: 24.8; p = 0.005) as independent predictive variables. The prevalence of pain or diplopia and symptom duration were not significantly different in patients with myositis or those with malignancy.
Conclusion: Excessive enlargement of a single extraocular muscle poses a diagnostic challenge due to the overlap of inflammatory and neoplastic features. Given the substantial proportion of malignancies, a high index of suspicion and early biopsy should be considered, particularly with SMO, a muscle diameter ≥10 mm, or prior history of cancer.
期刊介绍:
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.