{"title":"皮质类固醇治疗感染性休克患者持续性炎症、免疫抑制和分解代谢综合征的有效性:回顾性索赔数据库研究。","authors":"Hayabusa Takano, Naoki Kanda, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Minoru Yoshida, Kensuke Nakamura","doi":"10.1177/08850666251353723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPersistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome (PICS) that develops following critical illness is one of the most challenging issues in critical care medicine. While corticosteroids are widely used in septic shock, their impact on PICS remains unclear. While corticosteroids may reduce inflammation, they potentially increase infection risk and affect muscle function.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 3186 patients with septic shock from a Japanese administrative claims database, which was supplied by Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd (Tokyo, Japan). Using propensity score matching, we compared outcomes between patients who received corticosteroids within the first two days of admission (steroid group) and those who did not (control group). The primary outcome was the incidence of PICS on day 28, defined as meeting at least two of the following criteria: C-reactive protein >2.0 mg/dL, albumin <3.0 g/dL, and lymphocyte count <800/μL.ResultsA total of 4054 patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. After the exclusion of 868 patients, 3186 eligible patients (906 in the steroid group and 2280 in the control group) were included in the propensity score analysis. After matching, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PICS on day 28 between the steroid and control groups (16.7% vs 13.6%; risk difference, 2.22%; 95% CI, -1.89% to 6.34%; P = 0.095). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in 28-day mortality (15.2% vs 15.2%), in-hospital mortality, PICS on day 14, the Barthel Index at discharge or the percentage of patients meeting PICS criteria for each component on day 14 and day 28.ConclusionsThe administration of corticosteroids in patients with septic shock was not associated with the incidence of PICS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251353723"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Corticosteroids on Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome in Patients with Septic Shock: A Retrospective Claims Database Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hayabusa Takano, Naoki Kanda, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Minoru Yoshida, Kensuke Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08850666251353723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundPersistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome (PICS) that develops following critical illness is one of the most challenging issues in critical care medicine. While corticosteroids are widely used in septic shock, their impact on PICS remains unclear. While corticosteroids may reduce inflammation, they potentially increase infection risk and affect muscle function.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 3186 patients with septic shock from a Japanese administrative claims database, which was supplied by Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd (Tokyo, Japan). Using propensity score matching, we compared outcomes between patients who received corticosteroids within the first two days of admission (steroid group) and those who did not (control group). The primary outcome was the incidence of PICS on day 28, defined as meeting at least two of the following criteria: C-reactive protein >2.0 mg/dL, albumin <3.0 g/dL, and lymphocyte count <800/μL.ResultsA total of 4054 patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. After the exclusion of 868 patients, 3186 eligible patients (906 in the steroid group and 2280 in the control group) were included in the propensity score analysis. After matching, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PICS on day 28 between the steroid and control groups (16.7% vs 13.6%; risk difference, 2.22%; 95% CI, -1.89% to 6.34%; P = 0.095). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in 28-day mortality (15.2% vs 15.2%), in-hospital mortality, PICS on day 14, the Barthel Index at discharge or the percentage of patients meeting PICS criteria for each component on day 14 and day 28.ConclusionsThe administration of corticosteroids in patients with septic shock was not associated with the incidence of PICS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8850666251353723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251353723\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251353723","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在危重症后发生的持续性炎症、免疫抑制和分解代谢综合征(PICS)是危重症医学中最具挑战性的问题之一。虽然皮质类固醇广泛用于感染性休克,但其对PICS的影响尚不清楚。虽然皮质类固醇可以减少炎症,但它们可能会增加感染风险并影响肌肉功能。方法回顾性队列研究分析3186例败血症性休克患者,这些患者来自日本行政索赔数据库,该数据库由Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd (Tokyo, Japan)提供。使用倾向评分匹配,我们比较了入院前两天内接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者(类固醇组)和未接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者(对照组)的结果。主要终点是第28天PICS的发生率,定义为至少满足以下两个标准:c反应蛋白>2.0 mg/dL,白蛋白
Effectiveness of Corticosteroids on Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome in Patients with Septic Shock: A Retrospective Claims Database Study.
BackgroundPersistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome (PICS) that develops following critical illness is one of the most challenging issues in critical care medicine. While corticosteroids are widely used in septic shock, their impact on PICS remains unclear. While corticosteroids may reduce inflammation, they potentially increase infection risk and affect muscle function.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 3186 patients with septic shock from a Japanese administrative claims database, which was supplied by Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd (Tokyo, Japan). Using propensity score matching, we compared outcomes between patients who received corticosteroids within the first two days of admission (steroid group) and those who did not (control group). The primary outcome was the incidence of PICS on day 28, defined as meeting at least two of the following criteria: C-reactive protein >2.0 mg/dL, albumin <3.0 g/dL, and lymphocyte count <800/μL.ResultsA total of 4054 patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. After the exclusion of 868 patients, 3186 eligible patients (906 in the steroid group and 2280 in the control group) were included in the propensity score analysis. After matching, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PICS on day 28 between the steroid and control groups (16.7% vs 13.6%; risk difference, 2.22%; 95% CI, -1.89% to 6.34%; P = 0.095). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in 28-day mortality (15.2% vs 15.2%), in-hospital mortality, PICS on day 14, the Barthel Index at discharge or the percentage of patients meeting PICS criteria for each component on day 14 and day 28.ConclusionsThe administration of corticosteroids in patients with septic shock was not associated with the incidence of PICS.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.