探索与免疫检查点抑制剂相关的肿瘤溶解综合征:来自FAERS药物警戒数据库的见解。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yanling Yuan, Wanming He, Lihua Tong, Mindong Liu, Wubing Tang, Wen Yang, Xingxi Pan
{"title":"探索与免疫检查点抑制剂相关的肿瘤溶解综合征:来自FAERS药物警戒数据库的见解。","authors":"Yanling Yuan, Wanming He, Lihua Tong, Mindong Liu, Wubing Tang, Wen Yang, Xingxi Pan","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2527406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has raised concerns about immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including tumor lysis syndrome(TLS), traditionally linked to cytotoxic chemotherapy. This study investigates the association between ICIs and TLS, analyzing clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>ICIs-associated TLS cases reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q1 2011 to Q1 2024 were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis and Weibull shape parameter (WSP) modeling were used to assess reporting trends and onset patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 364 TLS cases, anti-PD-1 were most frequently implicated (<i>n</i> = 210), followed by anti-PD-L1 (<i>n</i> = 109) and anti-CTLA-4 (<i>n</i> = 45). Combination therapies accounted for 61.0% of cases, with distinct disease distributions: dual ICIs in melanoma (36.36%), ICIs plus chemotherapy in lung cancer (47.37%), and ICIs plus antiangiogenic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (59.14%). The median onset time was 9 days (IQR: 3-23.75), with WSP analysis indicating an early failure pattern (β = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICIs are significantly associated with TLS, particularly in combination regimens, necessitating early risk identification and close monitoring. Given the rising use of ICIs, proactive management and ongoing pharmacovigilance are essential to mitigate severe outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring tumor lysis syndrome linked to immune checkpoint inhibitors: insights from the FAERS pharmacovigilance database.\",\"authors\":\"Yanling Yuan, Wanming He, Lihua Tong, Mindong Liu, Wubing Tang, Wen Yang, Xingxi Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2025.2527406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has raised concerns about immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including tumor lysis syndrome(TLS), traditionally linked to cytotoxic chemotherapy. This study investigates the association between ICIs and TLS, analyzing clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>ICIs-associated TLS cases reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q1 2011 to Q1 2024 were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis and Weibull shape parameter (WSP) modeling were used to assess reporting trends and onset patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 364 TLS cases, anti-PD-1 were most frequently implicated (<i>n</i> = 210), followed by anti-PD-L1 (<i>n</i> = 109) and anti-CTLA-4 (<i>n</i> = 45). Combination therapies accounted for 61.0% of cases, with distinct disease distributions: dual ICIs in melanoma (36.36%), ICIs plus chemotherapy in lung cancer (47.37%), and ICIs plus antiangiogenic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (59.14%). The median onset time was 9 days (IQR: 3-23.75), with WSP analysis indicating an early failure pattern (β = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICIs are significantly associated with TLS, particularly in combination regimens, necessitating early risk identification and close monitoring. Given the rising use of ICIs, proactive management and ongoing pharmacovigilance are essential to mitigate severe outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2527406\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2527406","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的使用引起了对免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)的关注,包括肿瘤溶解综合征(TLS),传统上与细胞毒性化疗有关。本研究调查了ICIs和TLS之间的关系,分析了临床特征、治疗方案和结果。研究设计和方法:分析2011年第一季度至2024年第一季度FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中报告的与icis相关的TLS病例。歧化分析和威布尔形状参数(WSP)建模用于评估报告趋势和发病模式。结果:在364例TLS病例中,最常见的是抗pd -1 (n = 210),其次是抗pd - l1 (n = 109)和抗ctla -4 (n = 45)。联合治疗占61.0%,疾病分布明显:黑色素瘤双ICIs(36.36%),肺癌ICIs +化疗(47.37%),肝细胞癌ICIs +抗血管生成治疗(59.14%)。中位发病时间为9天(IQR: 3-23.75), WSP分析提示早期失效模式(β = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.85)。结论:ici与TLS显著相关,特别是在联合治疗方案中,需要早期风险识别和密切监测。鉴于ici的使用不断增加,积极的管理和持续的药物警戒对于减轻严重后果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring tumor lysis syndrome linked to immune checkpoint inhibitors: insights from the FAERS pharmacovigilance database.

Background: The increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has raised concerns about immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including tumor lysis syndrome(TLS), traditionally linked to cytotoxic chemotherapy. This study investigates the association between ICIs and TLS, analyzing clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes.

Research design and methods: ICIs-associated TLS cases reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q1 2011 to Q1 2024 were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis and Weibull shape parameter (WSP) modeling were used to assess reporting trends and onset patterns.

Results: Among 364 TLS cases, anti-PD-1 were most frequently implicated (n = 210), followed by anti-PD-L1 (n = 109) and anti-CTLA-4 (n = 45). Combination therapies accounted for 61.0% of cases, with distinct disease distributions: dual ICIs in melanoma (36.36%), ICIs plus chemotherapy in lung cancer (47.37%), and ICIs plus antiangiogenic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (59.14%). The median onset time was 9 days (IQR: 3-23.75), with WSP analysis indicating an early failure pattern (β = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.85).

Conclusions: ICIs are significantly associated with TLS, particularly in combination regimens, necessitating early risk identification and close monitoring. Given the rising use of ICIs, proactive management and ongoing pharmacovigilance are essential to mitigate severe outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信