血管紧张素受体-奈普利素抑制剂在并发心力衰竭伴射血分数降低和肾衰竭中的作用。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mi-Hyang Jung, Dong-Hyuk Cho, Jimi Choi, Mi-Na Kim, Chan Joo Lee, Jung-Woo Son, Yaeni Kim, Jong-Chan Youn, Byung-Su Yoo
{"title":"血管紧张素受体-奈普利素抑制剂在并发心力衰竭伴射血分数降低和肾衰竭中的作用。","authors":"Mi-Hyang Jung,&nbsp;Dong-Hyuk Cho,&nbsp;Jimi Choi,&nbsp;Mi-Na Kim,&nbsp;Chan Joo Lee,&nbsp;Jung-Woo Son,&nbsp;Yaeni Kim,&nbsp;Jong-Chan Youn,&nbsp;Byung-Su Yoo","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy has demonstrated improved outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, its benefits in patients with concomitant kidney failure undergoing replacement therapy remain uncertain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>Using the National Health Insurance Service database, we identified individuals with HFrEF and kidney failure receiving replacement therapy who were prescribed either ARNI or renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers between 2017 and 2021. After applying inverse probability of treatment weighting, we compared 2104 patients on ARNI with 2191 on RAS blockers. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and any hospitalization. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, any hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality. During a median follow-up of 19.1 months, ARNI use was associated with a significantly lower risk of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75–0.97) compared with RAS blockers. ARNI also showed a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54–0.86), any hospitalization (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75–0.98) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52–0.89). Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent associations across age, sex, comorbidities and medications. Good adherence to ARNI was linked to a lower risk of the primary outcome, whereas non-adherence showed no benefit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Among HFrEF patients with kidney failure receiving replacement therapy, ARNI use was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality, any hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality compared with RAS blockers, particularly in those with good adherence to therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":"12 5","pages":"3405-3415"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ehf2.15359","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in concurrent heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and kidney failure\",\"authors\":\"Mi-Hyang Jung,&nbsp;Dong-Hyuk Cho,&nbsp;Jimi Choi,&nbsp;Mi-Na Kim,&nbsp;Chan Joo Lee,&nbsp;Jung-Woo Son,&nbsp;Yaeni Kim,&nbsp;Jong-Chan Youn,&nbsp;Byung-Su Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ehf2.15359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy has demonstrated improved outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, its benefits in patients with concomitant kidney failure undergoing replacement therapy remain uncertain.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using the National Health Insurance Service database, we identified individuals with HFrEF and kidney failure receiving replacement therapy who were prescribed either ARNI or renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers between 2017 and 2021. After applying inverse probability of treatment weighting, we compared 2104 patients on ARNI with 2191 on RAS blockers. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and any hospitalization. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, any hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality. During a median follow-up of 19.1 months, ARNI use was associated with a significantly lower risk of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75–0.97) compared with RAS blockers. ARNI also showed a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54–0.86), any hospitalization (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75–0.98) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52–0.89). Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent associations across age, sex, comorbidities and medications. Good adherence to ARNI was linked to a lower risk of the primary outcome, whereas non-adherence showed no benefit.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among HFrEF patients with kidney failure receiving replacement therapy, ARNI use was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality, any hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality compared with RAS blockers, particularly in those with good adherence to therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"3405-3415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ehf2.15359\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.15359\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.15359","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:血管紧张素受体-neprilysin抑制剂(ARNI)治疗可改善心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的预后。然而,它对接受替代治疗的合并肾衰竭患者的益处仍不确定。方法和结果:使用国家健康保险服务数据库,我们确定了在2017年至2021年期间服用ARNI或肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)阻滞剂的HFrEF和肾衰竭患者接受替代治疗。在应用治疗加权逆概率后,我们比较了2104例ARNI患者和2191例RAS受体阻滞剂患者。主要终点是全因死亡率和住院率的综合。次要终点包括全因死亡率、住院率和心血管死亡率。在19.1个月的中位随访期间,与RAS阻滞剂相比,ARNI的使用与主要终点的风险显著降低相关(风险比[HR] 0.86, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.75-0.97)。ARNI还显示全因死亡率(HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.86)、任何住院(HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98)和心血管死亡率(HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.89)的风险降低。亚组分析显示,年龄、性别、合并症和药物之间存在一致的关联。良好的ARNI依从性与较低的主要结局风险相关,而不依从性则没有任何益处。结论:在接受替代治疗的HFrEF肾衰竭患者中,与RAS阻滞剂相比,ARNI的使用与全因死亡率、住院率和心血管死亡率的风险较低相关,特别是在那些治疗依从性良好的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in concurrent heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and kidney failure

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in concurrent heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and kidney failure

Aims

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy has demonstrated improved outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, its benefits in patients with concomitant kidney failure undergoing replacement therapy remain uncertain.

Methods and results

Using the National Health Insurance Service database, we identified individuals with HFrEF and kidney failure receiving replacement therapy who were prescribed either ARNI or renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers between 2017 and 2021. After applying inverse probability of treatment weighting, we compared 2104 patients on ARNI with 2191 on RAS blockers. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and any hospitalization. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, any hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality. During a median follow-up of 19.1 months, ARNI use was associated with a significantly lower risk of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75–0.97) compared with RAS blockers. ARNI also showed a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54–0.86), any hospitalization (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75–0.98) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52–0.89). Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent associations across age, sex, comorbidities and medications. Good adherence to ARNI was linked to a lower risk of the primary outcome, whereas non-adherence showed no benefit.

Conclusions

Among HFrEF patients with kidney failure receiving replacement therapy, ARNI use was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality, any hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality compared with RAS blockers, particularly in those with good adherence to therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ESC Heart Failure
ESC Heart Failure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
461
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信