在法国1型糖尿病患者中,MiniMed™780G先进混合闭环系统与间歇扫描连续血糖监测与每日多次胰岛素注射的成本-效用分析

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Helene Hanaire, Asli Zeynep Ozdemir Saltik, Richard F Pollock, Neesha Nanu, Clea Sambuc, Apolline Grangeon, Simona De Portu, Pierre Koch, Ohad Cohen, Charles Thivolet
{"title":"在法国1型糖尿病患者中,MiniMed™780G先进混合闭环系统与间歇扫描连续血糖监测与每日多次胰岛素注射的成本-效用分析","authors":"Helene Hanaire, Asli Zeynep Ozdemir Saltik, Richard F Pollock, Neesha Nanu, Clea Sambuc, Apolline Grangeon, Simona De Portu, Pierre Koch, Ohad Cohen, Charles Thivolet","doi":"10.1089/dia.2025.0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background and Aims:</i></b> Advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) automated insulin delivery systems such as the MiniMed™ 780G have been shown to result in substantial improvements in disease management in people living with type 1 diabetes. The aim of the analysis was to assess the cost utility of the MiniMed 780G system compared with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (is-CGM) and multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) in people living with type 1 diabetes in France, to estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) and inform decision-making. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The analysis was performed using the CORE Diabetes Model (version 9.5) and clinical input data were sourced from a randomized controlled trial, with glycated hemoglobin reductions of 1.54% (16.8 mmol/mol) and 0.2% (2.18 mmol/mol) assumed for the MiniMed 780G arm and is-CGM + MDI arm, respectively. The analysis was conducted from a national payer perspective over a 40-year time horizon; future costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 2.5% per annum. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the base case analysis, use of the MiniMed 780G system was associated with a mean gain in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 2.26 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with is-CGM + MDI (16.33 QALYs vs. 14.07 QALYs), while mean direct lifetime costs were EUR 78,509 higher (EUR 215,037 vs. EUR 136,528), resulting in an ICUR of EUR 34,732 per QALY gained. Findings from sensitivity analyses showed that analyses were robust to changes in assumptions in most input parameters. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In people with type 1 diabetes in France not achieving glycemic target levels at baseline, the use of the MiniMed 780G system was projected to lead to substantial improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy compared with continued use of is-CGM + MDI, with an ICUR of EUR 34,732 per QALY gained.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Utility Analysis of the MiniMed<b>™</b> 780G Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System Versus Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections in People with Type 1 Diabetes in France.\",\"authors\":\"Helene Hanaire, Asli Zeynep Ozdemir Saltik, Richard F Pollock, Neesha Nanu, Clea Sambuc, Apolline Grangeon, Simona De Portu, Pierre Koch, Ohad Cohen, Charles Thivolet\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dia.2025.0100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background and Aims:</i></b> Advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) automated insulin delivery systems such as the MiniMed™ 780G have been shown to result in substantial improvements in disease management in people living with type 1 diabetes. The aim of the analysis was to assess the cost utility of the MiniMed 780G system compared with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (is-CGM) and multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) in people living with type 1 diabetes in France, to estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) and inform decision-making. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The analysis was performed using the CORE Diabetes Model (version 9.5) and clinical input data were sourced from a randomized controlled trial, with glycated hemoglobin reductions of 1.54% (16.8 mmol/mol) and 0.2% (2.18 mmol/mol) assumed for the MiniMed 780G arm and is-CGM + MDI arm, respectively. The analysis was conducted from a national payer perspective over a 40-year time horizon; future costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 2.5% per annum. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the base case analysis, use of the MiniMed 780G system was associated with a mean gain in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 2.26 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with is-CGM + MDI (16.33 QALYs vs. 14.07 QALYs), while mean direct lifetime costs were EUR 78,509 higher (EUR 215,037 vs. EUR 136,528), resulting in an ICUR of EUR 34,732 per QALY gained. Findings from sensitivity analyses showed that analyses were robust to changes in assumptions in most input parameters. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In people with type 1 diabetes in France not achieving glycemic target levels at baseline, the use of the MiniMed 780G system was projected to lead to substantial improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy compared with continued use of is-CGM + MDI, with an ICUR of EUR 34,732 per QALY gained.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2025.0100\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2025.0100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:先进的混合闭环(AHCL)自动化胰岛素输送系统,如MiniMed™780G,已被证明可显著改善1型糖尿病患者的疾病管理。分析的目的是评估MiniMed 780G系统与间歇性扫描连续血糖监测(is-CGM)和每日多次胰岛素注射(MDI)在法国1型糖尿病患者中的成本效用,以估计增量成本效用比(ICUR)并为决策提供信息。方法:采用CORE糖尿病模型(9.5版)进行分析,临床输入数据来自一项随机对照试验,假设MiniMed 780G组和is-CGM + MDI组糖化血红蛋白分别降低1.54% (16.8 mmol/mol)和0.2% (2.18 mmol/mol)。分析是从国家付款人的角度进行的,时间跨度为40年;未来成本和临床结果每年折现2.5%。结果:在基本案例分析中,与is-CGM + MDI (16.33 QALYs vs 14.07 QALYs)相比,使用MiniMed 780G系统的质量调整寿命预期平均增加2.26质量调整寿命年(QALYs),而平均直接寿命成本高出78,509欧元(215,037欧元vs 136,528欧元),导致每获得QALY的ICUR为34,732欧元。敏感性分析的结果表明,分析对大多数输入参数的假设变化是稳健的。结论:在法国未达到基线血糖目标水平的1型糖尿病患者中,与继续使用is-CGM + MDI相比,预计使用MiniMed 780G系统可显著改善质量调整预期寿命,每QALY获得的ICUR为34,732欧元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-Utility Analysis of the MiniMed 780G Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System Versus Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections in People with Type 1 Diabetes in France.

Background and Aims: Advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) automated insulin delivery systems such as the MiniMed™ 780G have been shown to result in substantial improvements in disease management in people living with type 1 diabetes. The aim of the analysis was to assess the cost utility of the MiniMed 780G system compared with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (is-CGM) and multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) in people living with type 1 diabetes in France, to estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) and inform decision-making. Methods: The analysis was performed using the CORE Diabetes Model (version 9.5) and clinical input data were sourced from a randomized controlled trial, with glycated hemoglobin reductions of 1.54% (16.8 mmol/mol) and 0.2% (2.18 mmol/mol) assumed for the MiniMed 780G arm and is-CGM + MDI arm, respectively. The analysis was conducted from a national payer perspective over a 40-year time horizon; future costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 2.5% per annum. Results: In the base case analysis, use of the MiniMed 780G system was associated with a mean gain in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 2.26 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with is-CGM + MDI (16.33 QALYs vs. 14.07 QALYs), while mean direct lifetime costs were EUR 78,509 higher (EUR 215,037 vs. EUR 136,528), resulting in an ICUR of EUR 34,732 per QALY gained. Findings from sensitivity analyses showed that analyses were robust to changes in assumptions in most input parameters. Conclusions: In people with type 1 diabetes in France not achieving glycemic target levels at baseline, the use of the MiniMed 780G system was projected to lead to substantial improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy compared with continued use of is-CGM + MDI, with an ICUR of EUR 34,732 per QALY gained.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信