为COPD患者在出院前后提供药物相关支持——医院工作人员观点的定性研究

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Torbjørn Nygård, David Wright, Reidun L S Kjome, Hamde Nazar, Aase Raddum
{"title":"为COPD患者在出院前后提供药物相关支持——医院工作人员观点的定性研究","authors":"Torbjørn Nygård, David Wright, Reidun L S Kjome, Hamde Nazar, Aase Raddum","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12992-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are frequently admitted to hospital and experience challenges with their medicines. Changing service delivery to address medicines-related challenges has been shown to reduce readmissions and improve patient outcomes. Before attempting to improve medicines-related support through new interventions, it is necessary to firstly understand contextual factors surrounding the delivery of current usual care. The aim was to identify improvement areas of medicines support during and after hospital discharge, and why this support is not always provided.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospital pulmonary ward staff were included in a focus group and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed through systematic text condensation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six major themes were developed and classified as organisational or practitioner level. Organisational level themes were: (1) transfer between care levels is challenging, (2) follow-up lacks coordination, and (3) low financial resources. Practitioner level themes were: (4) competence about COPD is needed, (5) clarification of professional role and task distribution, and (6) practitioners need to educate and support patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medicines support for people with COPD during and after discharge would benefit from undertaking medicines reconciliation and increasing coordination across care levels. Furthermore, choice of inhaler devices should not be limited by reimbursement systems. Medicines support interventions should be adapted for primary and secondary care settings or include collaboration across care levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"899"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Providing medicines-related support for people with COPD before and after hospital discharge-a qualitative study of hospital staff perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Torbjørn Nygård, David Wright, Reidun L S Kjome, Hamde Nazar, Aase Raddum\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-12992-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are frequently admitted to hospital and experience challenges with their medicines. Changing service delivery to address medicines-related challenges has been shown to reduce readmissions and improve patient outcomes. Before attempting to improve medicines-related support through new interventions, it is necessary to firstly understand contextual factors surrounding the delivery of current usual care. The aim was to identify improvement areas of medicines support during and after hospital discharge, and why this support is not always provided.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospital pulmonary ward staff were included in a focus group and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed through systematic text condensation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six major themes were developed and classified as organisational or practitioner level. Organisational level themes were: (1) transfer between care levels is challenging, (2) follow-up lacks coordination, and (3) low financial resources. Practitioner level themes were: (4) competence about COPD is needed, (5) clarification of professional role and task distribution, and (6) practitioners need to educate and support patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medicines support for people with COPD during and after discharge would benefit from undertaking medicines reconciliation and increasing coordination across care levels. Furthermore, choice of inhaler devices should not be limited by reimbursement systems. Medicines support interventions should be adapted for primary and secondary care settings or include collaboration across care levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224747/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12992-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12992-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者经常住院并经历药物挑战。改变服务提供方式以应对与药物相关的挑战已被证明可以减少再入院率并改善患者预后。在试图通过新的干预措施改善与药物相关的支持之前,有必要首先了解围绕当前常规护理提供的环境因素。目的是确定在出院期间和出院后提供药物支助的改进领域,以及为什么不总是提供这种支助。方法:采用焦点小组法和半结构化访谈法对医院肺病房工作人员进行调查。通过系统的文本浓缩对数据进行分析。结果:六个主要主题被开发和分类为组织或从业者水平。组织层面的主题是:(1)护理级别之间的转移具有挑战性;(2)后续工作缺乏协调;(3)财政资源不足。从业者层面的主题为:(4)需要具备COPD相关知识;(5)明确专业角色和任务分配;(6)从业者需要对患者进行教育和支持。结论:对COPD患者在出院期间和出院后的药物支持将受益于开展药物协调和加强护理水平之间的协调。此外,吸入器装置的选择不应受到报销制度的限制。药物支持干预措施应适应初级和二级保健环境,或包括各级保健之间的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Providing medicines-related support for people with COPD before and after hospital discharge-a qualitative study of hospital staff perspectives.

Background: People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are frequently admitted to hospital and experience challenges with their medicines. Changing service delivery to address medicines-related challenges has been shown to reduce readmissions and improve patient outcomes. Before attempting to improve medicines-related support through new interventions, it is necessary to firstly understand contextual factors surrounding the delivery of current usual care. The aim was to identify improvement areas of medicines support during and after hospital discharge, and why this support is not always provided.

Methods: Hospital pulmonary ward staff were included in a focus group and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed through systematic text condensation.

Results: Six major themes were developed and classified as organisational or practitioner level. Organisational level themes were: (1) transfer between care levels is challenging, (2) follow-up lacks coordination, and (3) low financial resources. Practitioner level themes were: (4) competence about COPD is needed, (5) clarification of professional role and task distribution, and (6) practitioners need to educate and support patients.

Conclusions: Medicines support for people with COPD during and after discharge would benefit from undertaking medicines reconciliation and increasing coordination across care levels. Furthermore, choice of inhaler devices should not be limited by reimbursement systems. Medicines support interventions should be adapted for primary and secondary care settings or include collaboration across care levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信