Patrycja Zielińska, Karolina Gruenpeter, Agata Wieczorkiewicz-Kabut, Krzysztof Białas, Anna Koclęga, Izabela Noster, Izabela Szewczyk, Kinga Boral, Katarzyna Wiśniewska-Piąty, Aleksandra Butrym, Jarosław Czyż, Ewa Lutwin, Grzegorz Helbig
{"title":"第二次同种异体移植治疗复发性急性白血病是否值得冒险?","authors":"Patrycja Zielińska, Karolina Gruenpeter, Agata Wieczorkiewicz-Kabut, Krzysztof Białas, Anna Koclęga, Izabela Noster, Izabela Szewczyk, Kinga Boral, Katarzyna Wiśniewska-Piąty, Aleksandra Butrym, Jarosław Czyż, Ewa Lutwin, Grzegorz Helbig","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06468-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT2) presents a potentially curative treatment approach in patients who relapsed after first allogeneic transplant procedure. Currently there is no consensus on second allografting. The aim of our study was to analyze the outcome and prognostic factors of SCT2 in relapsed acute leukemia setting. The study comprised 60 patients at a median age of 44.7 years (37 females, 23 males) who underwent SCT2 due to relapsed acute leukemia between 2000 and 2024 in our center. Median remission duration after SCT1 was 13.6 (IQR 30.1) months and median time from relapse to SCT2 was 4 (IQR 3) months. Disease-risk index at SCT2 was as follows: low - 2 (3.3%), intermediate - 29 (48,4%), high - 27 (45%) and very high - 2 (3.3%). The same donor was used in 52 procedures (86.7%). Six patients died before engraftment due to severe infectious complications. The 2-year probability of overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) were 26.6% and 26.2%, respectively. Median follow-up after SCT2 was 10.7 (IQR 35) months. At the last follow-up, 22 patients (37%) were alive. The 2-year cumulative relapse incidence (RI) was 47.4% and cumulative non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 55.3%. The factors that adversely influenced survival were as follows: early relapse after SCT1 (< 6 months after transplantation) (p = 0.018) and the use of reduced intensity conditioning before SCT2 (p = 0.0272). Presented data indicate that second allograft is a feasible option in selected patients with relapsed acute leukemia. There is still room for improvement in terms of non-relapse mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second allogeneic transplantation in relapsed acute leukemia - a risk worth taking?\",\"authors\":\"Patrycja Zielińska, Karolina Gruenpeter, Agata Wieczorkiewicz-Kabut, Krzysztof Białas, Anna Koclęga, Izabela Noster, Izabela Szewczyk, Kinga Boral, Katarzyna Wiśniewska-Piąty, Aleksandra Butrym, Jarosław Czyż, Ewa Lutwin, Grzegorz Helbig\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00277-025-06468-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT2) presents a potentially curative treatment approach in patients who relapsed after first allogeneic transplant procedure. Currently there is no consensus on second allografting. The aim of our study was to analyze the outcome and prognostic factors of SCT2 in relapsed acute leukemia setting. The study comprised 60 patients at a median age of 44.7 years (37 females, 23 males) who underwent SCT2 due to relapsed acute leukemia between 2000 and 2024 in our center. Median remission duration after SCT1 was 13.6 (IQR 30.1) months and median time from relapse to SCT2 was 4 (IQR 3) months. Disease-risk index at SCT2 was as follows: low - 2 (3.3%), intermediate - 29 (48,4%), high - 27 (45%) and very high - 2 (3.3%). The same donor was used in 52 procedures (86.7%). Six patients died before engraftment due to severe infectious complications. The 2-year probability of overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) were 26.6% and 26.2%, respectively. Median follow-up after SCT2 was 10.7 (IQR 35) months. At the last follow-up, 22 patients (37%) were alive. The 2-year cumulative relapse incidence (RI) was 47.4% and cumulative non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 55.3%. The factors that adversely influenced survival were as follows: early relapse after SCT1 (< 6 months after transplantation) (p = 0.018) and the use of reduced intensity conditioning before SCT2 (p = 0.0272). Presented data indicate that second allograft is a feasible option in selected patients with relapsed acute leukemia. There is still room for improvement in terms of non-relapse mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06468-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06468-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Second allogeneic transplantation in relapsed acute leukemia - a risk worth taking?
Second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT2) presents a potentially curative treatment approach in patients who relapsed after first allogeneic transplant procedure. Currently there is no consensus on second allografting. The aim of our study was to analyze the outcome and prognostic factors of SCT2 in relapsed acute leukemia setting. The study comprised 60 patients at a median age of 44.7 years (37 females, 23 males) who underwent SCT2 due to relapsed acute leukemia between 2000 and 2024 in our center. Median remission duration after SCT1 was 13.6 (IQR 30.1) months and median time from relapse to SCT2 was 4 (IQR 3) months. Disease-risk index at SCT2 was as follows: low - 2 (3.3%), intermediate - 29 (48,4%), high - 27 (45%) and very high - 2 (3.3%). The same donor was used in 52 procedures (86.7%). Six patients died before engraftment due to severe infectious complications. The 2-year probability of overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) were 26.6% and 26.2%, respectively. Median follow-up after SCT2 was 10.7 (IQR 35) months. At the last follow-up, 22 patients (37%) were alive. The 2-year cumulative relapse incidence (RI) was 47.4% and cumulative non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 55.3%. The factors that adversely influenced survival were as follows: early relapse after SCT1 (< 6 months after transplantation) (p = 0.018) and the use of reduced intensity conditioning before SCT2 (p = 0.0272). Presented data indicate that second allograft is a feasible option in selected patients with relapsed acute leukemia. There is still room for improvement in terms of non-relapse mortality.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.