改良陡坡试验作为胰腺手术患者术前风险评估的实用运动试验的有效性

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Heleen Driessens , Lis S.M. Hoeijmakers , Olav D.J. Zwerver , Allard G. Wijma , Nicole D. Hildebrand , Remy R.Y.C. Queisen , Mayella Kuikhoven , Marcel den Dulk , Steven W.M. Olde Damink , Joost M. Klaase , Bart C. Bongers
{"title":"改良陡坡试验作为胰腺手术患者术前风险评估的实用运动试验的有效性","authors":"Heleen Driessens ,&nbsp;Lis S.M. Hoeijmakers ,&nbsp;Olav D.J. Zwerver ,&nbsp;Allard G. Wijma ,&nbsp;Nicole D. Hildebrand ,&nbsp;Remy R.Y.C. Queisen ,&nbsp;Mayella Kuikhoven ,&nbsp;Marcel den Dulk ,&nbsp;Steven W.M. Olde Damink ,&nbsp;Joost M. Klaase ,&nbsp;Bart C. Bongers","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The widespread implementation of a preoperative assessment of aerobic capacity requires a practical field test. This study investigated the validity of the modified steep ramp test (SRT) for evaluating preoperative aerobic capacity and to evaluate its usefulness for preoperative risk assessment in patients planned for pancreatic surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients scheduled for pancreatic surgery who preoperatively performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and the modified SRT within 14 days were included. To assess its criterion validity, the correlation between the achieved work rate at peak exercise (WR<sub>peak</sub>) at the modified SRT and oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>) at peak exercise (VO<sub>2peak</sub>) during CPET was determined. To evaluate the ability of the modified SRT to correctly classify patients as fit or unfit, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed based on the CPET VO<sub>2peak</sub> cutoff 18.0 ml.kg<sup>−1</sup>.min<sup>−1</sup> and VO<sub>2</sub> at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) cutoff 11.0 ml.kg<sup>−1</sup>.min<sup>−1</sup>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-eight patients (21 females) aged 68.7 ± 7.6 years were included. Modified SRT WR<sub>peak</sub> (W/kg) demonstrated a very strong correlation with CPET VO<sub>2peak</sub> (<em>ρ</em> = 0.865, <em>r</em> = 0.926). The modified SRT WR<sub>peak</sub> cutoff to most accurately classify patients as fit or unfit was 2.095 W/kg for the CPET VO<sub>2peak</sub> cutoff (area under the curve (AUC) of 0.948) and the CPET VO<sub>2</sub> at the VAT cutoff (AUC of 0.814).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The modified SRT is a valid short-term practical exercise test to preoperatively assess aerobic capacity in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. A modified SRT performance below 2.1 W/kg seems clinically most suitable to select candidates for further preoperative CPET evaluation and/or prehabilitation, given its positive and negative predictive value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 111916"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The usefulness of the modified steep ramp test as a practical exercise test for preoperative risk assessment in patients scheduled for pancreatic surgery\",\"authors\":\"Heleen Driessens ,&nbsp;Lis S.M. Hoeijmakers ,&nbsp;Olav D.J. Zwerver ,&nbsp;Allard G. Wijma ,&nbsp;Nicole D. Hildebrand ,&nbsp;Remy R.Y.C. Queisen ,&nbsp;Mayella Kuikhoven ,&nbsp;Marcel den Dulk ,&nbsp;Steven W.M. Olde Damink ,&nbsp;Joost M. Klaase ,&nbsp;Bart C. Bongers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The widespread implementation of a preoperative assessment of aerobic capacity requires a practical field test. This study investigated the validity of the modified steep ramp test (SRT) for evaluating preoperative aerobic capacity and to evaluate its usefulness for preoperative risk assessment in patients planned for pancreatic surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients scheduled for pancreatic surgery who preoperatively performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and the modified SRT within 14 days were included. To assess its criterion validity, the correlation between the achieved work rate at peak exercise (WR<sub>peak</sub>) at the modified SRT and oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>) at peak exercise (VO<sub>2peak</sub>) during CPET was determined. To evaluate the ability of the modified SRT to correctly classify patients as fit or unfit, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed based on the CPET VO<sub>2peak</sub> cutoff 18.0 ml.kg<sup>−1</sup>.min<sup>−1</sup> and VO<sub>2</sub> at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) cutoff 11.0 ml.kg<sup>−1</sup>.min<sup>−1</sup>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-eight patients (21 females) aged 68.7 ± 7.6 years were included. Modified SRT WR<sub>peak</sub> (W/kg) demonstrated a very strong correlation with CPET VO<sub>2peak</sub> (<em>ρ</em> = 0.865, <em>r</em> = 0.926). The modified SRT WR<sub>peak</sub> cutoff to most accurately classify patients as fit or unfit was 2.095 W/kg for the CPET VO<sub>2peak</sub> cutoff (area under the curve (AUC) of 0.948) and the CPET VO<sub>2</sub> at the VAT cutoff (AUC of 0.814).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The modified SRT is a valid short-term practical exercise test to preoperatively assess aerobic capacity in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. A modified SRT performance below 2.1 W/kg seems clinically most suitable to select candidates for further preoperative CPET evaluation and/or prehabilitation, given its positive and negative predictive value.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111916\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025001771\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025001771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术前有氧能力评估的广泛实施需要实际的现场测试。本研究探讨了改良陡坡试验(SRT)评估术前有氧能力的有效性,并评估其在计划行胰腺手术患者术前风险评估中的有效性。方法纳入术前14天内进行心肺运动试验(CPET)和改良SRT的胰腺手术患者。为了评估其标准的有效性,我们测定了改良SRT时的峰值运动达到的工作速率(WRpeak)与CPET时的峰值运动摄氧量(VO2peak)之间的相关性。为了评估改进的SRT正确分类患者适合或不适合的能力,基于CPET vo2峰值截止值18.0 ml.kg−1进行了受试者工作特征(ROC)分析。min−1和VO2在通气厌氧阈值(VAT)截止11.0 ml.kg−1 min−1。结果共纳入48例患者,其中女性21例,年龄68.7±7.6岁。改良SRT WRpeak (W/kg)与CPET VO2peak有很强的相关性(ρ = 0.865, r = 0.926)。改进的SRT WRpeak截止值对于CPET VO2峰值截止值(曲线下面积(AUC)为0.948)和CPET VO2在VAT截止值(AUC为0.814)为2.095 W/kg,可以最准确地对患者进行适合或不适合的分类。结论改良SRT是一种有效的短期实用运动试验,可用于评估胰腺手术患者术前有氧能力。考虑到其阳性和阴性预测价值,在临床上,低于2.1 W/kg的改良SRT表现似乎最适合选择候选人进行进一步的术前CPET评估和/或预康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The usefulness of the modified steep ramp test as a practical exercise test for preoperative risk assessment in patients scheduled for pancreatic surgery

The usefulness of the modified steep ramp test as a practical exercise test for preoperative risk assessment in patients scheduled for pancreatic surgery

Background

The widespread implementation of a preoperative assessment of aerobic capacity requires a practical field test. This study investigated the validity of the modified steep ramp test (SRT) for evaluating preoperative aerobic capacity and to evaluate its usefulness for preoperative risk assessment in patients planned for pancreatic surgery.

Methods

Patients scheduled for pancreatic surgery who preoperatively performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and the modified SRT within 14 days were included. To assess its criterion validity, the correlation between the achieved work rate at peak exercise (WRpeak) at the modified SRT and oxygen uptake (VO2) at peak exercise (VO2peak) during CPET was determined. To evaluate the ability of the modified SRT to correctly classify patients as fit or unfit, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed based on the CPET VO2peak cutoff 18.0 ml.kg−1.min−1 and VO2 at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) cutoff 11.0 ml.kg−1.min−1.

Results

Forty-eight patients (21 females) aged 68.7 ± 7.6 years were included. Modified SRT WRpeak (W/kg) demonstrated a very strong correlation with CPET VO2peak (ρ = 0.865, r = 0.926). The modified SRT WRpeak cutoff to most accurately classify patients as fit or unfit was 2.095 W/kg for the CPET VO2peak cutoff (area under the curve (AUC) of 0.948) and the CPET VO2 at the VAT cutoff (AUC of 0.814).

Conclusions

The modified SRT is a valid short-term practical exercise test to preoperatively assess aerobic capacity in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. A modified SRT performance below 2.1 W/kg seems clinically most suitable to select candidates for further preoperative CPET evaluation and/or prehabilitation, given its positive and negative predictive value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信