{"title":"机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中预测与实际软组织平衡的差异","authors":"Hiroshi Inui, Haruhiko Nakamura, Ryota Takei, Masaki Uchida, Kei Satou, Tetsu Yamashita, Risa Matsumoto","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.06.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Achieving optimal soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is vital for successful clinical outcomes. Robotic-assisted TKA predicts postoperative soft tissue balance based on preoperative varus–valgus stress. Nevertheless, these predictions may not always be accurate due to changes in soft tissue balance after osteotomy and variability in manual stress application. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the differences between predicted and final soft tissue balance and determine the factors affecting these differences.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 112 robotic-assisted TKA cases, the predicted joint gaps at extension (10°) and flexion (90°) were evaluated intraoperatively before osteotomy, and the final joint gaps were evaluated after final implantation under manual varus–valgus stress. Differences between the predicted and final gaps (DPFG) e calculated, and correlations between DPFG and preoperative parameters were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final joint gaps were significantly larger than the predicted gaps in both extension and flexion (P < 0.001). A greater preoperative hip–knee–ankle angle and increased flexion angle were associated with smaller DPFG in the medial compartment. Conversely, severe preoperative flexion contracture correlated with larger DPFG in extension in the lateral compartment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Soft tissue balance predictions in robotic-assisted TKA are not always accurate, with the final joint gaps tending to be larger than predicted. Preoperative limb alignment and knee range of motion influence these differences, emphasizing the need for surgeons to interpret robotic predictions cautiously. Adjustments during surgery may be required to optimize soft tissue balance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"66 ","pages":"Pages 257-262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepancy between predicted and actual soft tissue balance in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshi Inui, Haruhiko Nakamura, Ryota Takei, Masaki Uchida, Kei Satou, Tetsu Yamashita, Risa Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jor.2025.06.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Achieving optimal soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is vital for successful clinical outcomes. Robotic-assisted TKA predicts postoperative soft tissue balance based on preoperative varus–valgus stress. Nevertheless, these predictions may not always be accurate due to changes in soft tissue balance after osteotomy and variability in manual stress application. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the differences between predicted and final soft tissue balance and determine the factors affecting these differences.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 112 robotic-assisted TKA cases, the predicted joint gaps at extension (10°) and flexion (90°) were evaluated intraoperatively before osteotomy, and the final joint gaps were evaluated after final implantation under manual varus–valgus stress. Differences between the predicted and final gaps (DPFG) e calculated, and correlations between DPFG and preoperative parameters were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final joint gaps were significantly larger than the predicted gaps in both extension and flexion (P < 0.001). A greater preoperative hip–knee–ankle angle and increased flexion angle were associated with smaller DPFG in the medial compartment. Conversely, severe preoperative flexion contracture correlated with larger DPFG in extension in the lateral compartment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Soft tissue balance predictions in robotic-assisted TKA are not always accurate, with the final joint gaps tending to be larger than predicted. Preoperative limb alignment and knee range of motion influence these differences, emphasizing the need for surgeons to interpret robotic predictions cautiously. Adjustments during surgery may be required to optimize soft tissue balance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 257-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25002569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25002569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discrepancy between predicted and actual soft tissue balance in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty
Background
Achieving optimal soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is vital for successful clinical outcomes. Robotic-assisted TKA predicts postoperative soft tissue balance based on preoperative varus–valgus stress. Nevertheless, these predictions may not always be accurate due to changes in soft tissue balance after osteotomy and variability in manual stress application. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the differences between predicted and final soft tissue balance and determine the factors affecting these differences.
Methods
In 112 robotic-assisted TKA cases, the predicted joint gaps at extension (10°) and flexion (90°) were evaluated intraoperatively before osteotomy, and the final joint gaps were evaluated after final implantation under manual varus–valgus stress. Differences between the predicted and final gaps (DPFG) e calculated, and correlations between DPFG and preoperative parameters were analyzed.
Results
The final joint gaps were significantly larger than the predicted gaps in both extension and flexion (P < 0.001). A greater preoperative hip–knee–ankle angle and increased flexion angle were associated with smaller DPFG in the medial compartment. Conversely, severe preoperative flexion contracture correlated with larger DPFG in extension in the lateral compartment.
Conclusion
Soft tissue balance predictions in robotic-assisted TKA are not always accurate, with the final joint gaps tending to be larger than predicted. Preoperative limb alignment and knee range of motion influence these differences, emphasizing the need for surgeons to interpret robotic predictions cautiously. Adjustments during surgery may be required to optimize soft tissue balance.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.