Iris T Lee, Kurt T Barnhart, Wei-Ting Hwang, Stefanie N Hinkle, Erica Johnstone, James L Mills, Ellen C Caniglia, Enrique F Schisterman, Pauline Mendola, Ginny L Ryan, Jim Hotaling, C Matthew Peterson, Bradley J Van Voorhis, Sunni L Mumford
{"title":"在接受生育治疗或尝试无辅助受孕的患者中,女性肥胖标志物与活产之间的关系","authors":"Iris T Lee, Kurt T Barnhart, Wei-Ting Hwang, Stefanie N Hinkle, Erica Johnstone, James L Mills, Ellen C Caniglia, Enrique F Schisterman, Pauline Mendola, Ginny L Ryan, Jim Hotaling, C Matthew Peterson, Bradley J Van Voorhis, Sunni L Mumford","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deaf124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY QUESTION Beyond BMI, are there better predictors of the impact of high female adiposity on reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing fertility treatment or attempting unassisted conception? SUMMARY ANSWER Though BMI remains a predictor of fertility outcomes, alternative markers of adiposity, such as percent body fat, provide distinct information and may be more strongly associated with outcomes than BMI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Elevated BMI is associated with a lower probability of live birth, though randomized trials have not consistently demonstrated the efficacy of weight loss for increasing live birth among patients utilizing infertility treatment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a secondary analysis of data gathered from 2013 to 2017 during the Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial (FAZST). Participants in FAZST included 2370 heterosexual couples seeking infertility care at four US fertility centers. Couples were followed for 9 months while undergoing fertility treatments or attempting unassisted conception, with up to 9 additional months of follow-up if pregnancy occurred. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS For inclusion in the present study, female participants must have had at least one marker of adiposity measured at their baseline visit for FAZST. The primary exposure was high adiposity (defined by commonly used cutoffs in the literature) by each of five markers: BMI, percent body fat measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), serum leptin, serum adiponectin/leptin ratio, and waist circumference. Of the participants in FAZST, BMI was available for 99.6%, percent body fat for 7.3% (DXA only offered to 218 participants at two study sites between 2016 and 2017), leptin for 89.7%, adiponectin/leptin ratio for 89.7%, and waist circumference for 90.9%. Generalized linear models including age, race, parity, education, physical activity, male partner BMI ≥30 kg/m2, and Healthy Eating Index were used to estimate the relative risk of live birth. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE High adiposity by BMI was associated with decreased probability of live birth (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.74–0.98). The other markers demonstrated similar associations, though a stronger effect size was seen with percent body fat (aRR 0.34, 95% CI 0.22–0.55). In an analysis by tertile, even moderately elevated percent body fat was associated with a decrease in live birth. When stratifying by infertility treatment status, associations were attenuated for most markers in the group utilizing infertility treatment, though percent body fat remained significantly associated with live birth. However, this marker was only available in a subset of participants. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Only a subset of participants underwent DXA scans and had data on percent body fat, limiting the generalizability of the finding that this marker was most strongly associated with live birth. There were few participants with low BMIs, limiting the ability to draw conclusions on how low adiposity may affect reproductive outcomes. Findings may not be generalizable to the non-infertility population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The findings support prior data that high adiposity is associated with a lower probability of live birth. While most markers of adiposity performed similarly to BMI, there may be a role for percent body fat as an alternative assessment of adiposity, particularly among patients utilizing infertility treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The FAZST and Impact of Diet, Exercise, and Lifestyle studies were supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (contracts HHSN275201200007C, HHSN275201500001C, HHSN275201300026I/HHSN27500008, and HHSN275201300026I/HHSN27500018). There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00467363 (secondary analysis).","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between markers of female adiposity and live birth among patients undergoing fertility treatment or attempting unassisted conception\",\"authors\":\"Iris T Lee, Kurt T Barnhart, Wei-Ting Hwang, Stefanie N Hinkle, Erica Johnstone, James L Mills, Ellen C Caniglia, Enrique F Schisterman, Pauline Mendola, Ginny L Ryan, Jim Hotaling, C Matthew Peterson, Bradley J Van Voorhis, Sunni L Mumford\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/humrep/deaf124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STUDY QUESTION Beyond BMI, are there better predictors of the impact of high female adiposity on reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing fertility treatment or attempting unassisted conception? SUMMARY ANSWER Though BMI remains a predictor of fertility outcomes, alternative markers of adiposity, such as percent body fat, provide distinct information and may be more strongly associated with outcomes than BMI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Elevated BMI is associated with a lower probability of live birth, though randomized trials have not consistently demonstrated the efficacy of weight loss for increasing live birth among patients utilizing infertility treatment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a secondary analysis of data gathered from 2013 to 2017 during the Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial (FAZST). Participants in FAZST included 2370 heterosexual couples seeking infertility care at four US fertility centers. Couples were followed for 9 months while undergoing fertility treatments or attempting unassisted conception, with up to 9 additional months of follow-up if pregnancy occurred. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS For inclusion in the present study, female participants must have had at least one marker of adiposity measured at their baseline visit for FAZST. The primary exposure was high adiposity (defined by commonly used cutoffs in the literature) by each of five markers: BMI, percent body fat measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), serum leptin, serum adiponectin/leptin ratio, and waist circumference. Of the participants in FAZST, BMI was available for 99.6%, percent body fat for 7.3% (DXA only offered to 218 participants at two study sites between 2016 and 2017), leptin for 89.7%, adiponectin/leptin ratio for 89.7%, and waist circumference for 90.9%. Generalized linear models including age, race, parity, education, physical activity, male partner BMI ≥30 kg/m2, and Healthy Eating Index were used to estimate the relative risk of live birth. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE High adiposity by BMI was associated with decreased probability of live birth (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.74–0.98). The other markers demonstrated similar associations, though a stronger effect size was seen with percent body fat (aRR 0.34, 95% CI 0.22–0.55). In an analysis by tertile, even moderately elevated percent body fat was associated with a decrease in live birth. When stratifying by infertility treatment status, associations were attenuated for most markers in the group utilizing infertility treatment, though percent body fat remained significantly associated with live birth. However, this marker was only available in a subset of participants. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Only a subset of participants underwent DXA scans and had data on percent body fat, limiting the generalizability of the finding that this marker was most strongly associated with live birth. There were few participants with low BMIs, limiting the ability to draw conclusions on how low adiposity may affect reproductive outcomes. Findings may not be generalizable to the non-infertility population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The findings support prior data that high adiposity is associated with a lower probability of live birth. While most markers of adiposity performed similarly to BMI, there may be a role for percent body fat as an alternative assessment of adiposity, particularly among patients utilizing infertility treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The FAZST and Impact of Diet, Exercise, and Lifestyle studies were supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (contracts HHSN275201200007C, HHSN275201500001C, HHSN275201300026I/HHSN27500008, and HHSN275201300026I/HHSN27500018). There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00467363 (secondary analysis).\",\"PeriodicalId\":13003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human reproduction\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf124\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf124","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究问题:除了BMI,在接受生育治疗或尝试无辅助受孕的患者中,是否有更好的预测女性高肥胖对生殖结果影响的指标?虽然BMI仍然是生育结果的一个预测指标,但肥胖的其他标志,如体脂百分比,提供了不同的信息,可能比BMI与生育结果的关系更密切。虽然随机试验并没有一致地证明在接受不孕症治疗的患者中减肥对增加活产的有效性,但BMI升高与低活产概率相关。研究设计、规模、持续时间这是对叶酸和锌补充试验(FAZST) 2013年至2017年收集的数据的二次分析。FAZST的参与者包括2370对在美国四个生育中心寻求不孕症治疗的异性恋夫妇。研究人员对接受生育治疗或尝试无辅助受孕的夫妇进行了9个月的随访,如果怀孕了,还会再进行9个月的随访。参与者/材料,环境,方法纳入本研究的女性参与者必须在基线FAZST就诊时至少测量过一种肥胖标志物。主要暴露为高肥胖(由文献中常用的临界值定义),通过五个指标:BMI、双能x线吸收仪(DXA)测量的体脂百分比、血清瘦素、血清脂联素/瘦素比值和腰围。在FAZST的参与者中,BMI为99.6%,体脂率为7.3% (DXA仅在2016年至2017年期间向两个研究地点的218名参与者提供),瘦素为89.7%,脂联素/瘦素比为89.7%,腰围为90.9%。采用广义线性模型,包括年龄、种族、胎次、受教育程度、体力活动、男性伴侣BMI≥30 kg/m2和健康饮食指数来估计活产的相对风险。BMI的高肥胖与活产概率降低相关(校正相对危险度[aRR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98)。其他指标也显示出类似的关联,尽管体脂百分比的效应值更强(aRR 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.55)。在一项分析中,即使是适度增加的体脂百分比也与活产率的下降有关。当按不孕症治疗状态分层时,在使用不孕症治疗的组中,大多数标记物的相关性减弱,尽管体脂百分比仍然与活产显著相关。然而,该标记仅在一部分参与者中可用。只有一部分参与者接受了DXA扫描,并获得了体脂百分比的数据,这限制了该标记与活产最密切相关的发现的普遍性。很少有低bmi的参与者,这限制了得出低脂肪如何影响生殖结果的结论的能力。研究结果可能不能推广到非不育人群。研究结果的更广泛意义这些发现支持了先前的数据,即高肥胖与较低的活产概率有关。虽然大多数肥胖指标的表现与BMI相似,但体脂百分比可能是肥胖的另一种评估方法,特别是在接受不孕症治疗的患者中。饮食、运动和生活方式的FAZST和影响研究由马里兰州贝塞斯达国立卫生研究院尤尼斯·肯尼迪·施莱弗国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所的校内研究项目支持(合同HHSN275201200007C, HHSN275201500001C, HHSN275201300026I/HHSN27500008和HHSN275201300026I/ hhsn2755500018)。没有需要申报的利益冲突。试验注册号NCT00467363(二次分析)。
Association between markers of female adiposity and live birth among patients undergoing fertility treatment or attempting unassisted conception
STUDY QUESTION Beyond BMI, are there better predictors of the impact of high female adiposity on reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing fertility treatment or attempting unassisted conception? SUMMARY ANSWER Though BMI remains a predictor of fertility outcomes, alternative markers of adiposity, such as percent body fat, provide distinct information and may be more strongly associated with outcomes than BMI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Elevated BMI is associated with a lower probability of live birth, though randomized trials have not consistently demonstrated the efficacy of weight loss for increasing live birth among patients utilizing infertility treatment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a secondary analysis of data gathered from 2013 to 2017 during the Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial (FAZST). Participants in FAZST included 2370 heterosexual couples seeking infertility care at four US fertility centers. Couples were followed for 9 months while undergoing fertility treatments or attempting unassisted conception, with up to 9 additional months of follow-up if pregnancy occurred. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS For inclusion in the present study, female participants must have had at least one marker of adiposity measured at their baseline visit for FAZST. The primary exposure was high adiposity (defined by commonly used cutoffs in the literature) by each of five markers: BMI, percent body fat measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), serum leptin, serum adiponectin/leptin ratio, and waist circumference. Of the participants in FAZST, BMI was available for 99.6%, percent body fat for 7.3% (DXA only offered to 218 participants at two study sites between 2016 and 2017), leptin for 89.7%, adiponectin/leptin ratio for 89.7%, and waist circumference for 90.9%. Generalized linear models including age, race, parity, education, physical activity, male partner BMI ≥30 kg/m2, and Healthy Eating Index were used to estimate the relative risk of live birth. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE High adiposity by BMI was associated with decreased probability of live birth (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.74–0.98). The other markers demonstrated similar associations, though a stronger effect size was seen with percent body fat (aRR 0.34, 95% CI 0.22–0.55). In an analysis by tertile, even moderately elevated percent body fat was associated with a decrease in live birth. When stratifying by infertility treatment status, associations were attenuated for most markers in the group utilizing infertility treatment, though percent body fat remained significantly associated with live birth. However, this marker was only available in a subset of participants. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Only a subset of participants underwent DXA scans and had data on percent body fat, limiting the generalizability of the finding that this marker was most strongly associated with live birth. There were few participants with low BMIs, limiting the ability to draw conclusions on how low adiposity may affect reproductive outcomes. Findings may not be generalizable to the non-infertility population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The findings support prior data that high adiposity is associated with a lower probability of live birth. While most markers of adiposity performed similarly to BMI, there may be a role for percent body fat as an alternative assessment of adiposity, particularly among patients utilizing infertility treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The FAZST and Impact of Diet, Exercise, and Lifestyle studies were supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (contracts HHSN275201200007C, HHSN275201500001C, HHSN275201300026I/HHSN27500008, and HHSN275201300026I/HHSN27500018). There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00467363 (secondary analysis).
期刊介绍:
Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues.
Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.