家庭医学住院医师对重症患者生存评估人工智能的看法

IF 7.7
Gemma Postill, Anglin Dent, Jill Dombroski, Amol A Verma, Jeff Myers, Tavis Apramian
{"title":"家庭医学住院医师对重症患者生存评估人工智能的看法","authors":"Gemma Postill, Anglin Dent, Jill Dombroski, Amol A Verma, Jeff Myers, Tavis Apramian","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As technology for artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has rapidly proliferated, research is needed on how AI should be used in healthcare. Family physicians could deploy AI to predict survival in serious illness which is a particularly difficult task given the breadth of diseases encountered in primary care. Little research exists to inform whether survival estimation tools are welcome in primary care to manage serious illness prognostication. To address this gap, we elicited the perspectives of family medicine residents on the potential use of AI to help them predict survival (i.e., time expected) for their patients with serious illness. Our qualitative study draws on semi-structured interview data from 18 family medicine residents in Canada. We used a pragmatic framework to conduct our analysis, employing principles of constructivist grounded theory. We identified that family medicine residents were receptive to AI survival estimation for serious illness management, particularly for supporting their delivery of expert advice over a broad range of clinical topics. However, caring for patients with serious illness in primary care involves more than survival estimation, with such a tool having likely only limited applicability to end of life. Summarizing these perspectives, we identified four themes: (1) improving patient care with AI, (2) AI with a grain of salt, (3) patient-driven use of AI, and (4) augmenting, not replacing family physicians. Thus, survival estimation with AI for serious illness has potential clinical value in primary care. In addition to survival, pertinent challenges to address with AI include understanding of expected function, maximizing quality of life, and response to interventions, in addition to quantifying survival time. Future prognostication models should consider use of additional patient-centered outcomes and modifying the outcomes predicted based on prediction timepoints. To successfully deploy these technologies in primary care, additional education and role modelling of technology use is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 7","pages":"e0000917"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12212547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of family medicine residents on artificial intelligence for survival estimation in patients with serious illness.\",\"authors\":\"Gemma Postill, Anglin Dent, Jill Dombroski, Amol A Verma, Jeff Myers, Tavis Apramian\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As technology for artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has rapidly proliferated, research is needed on how AI should be used in healthcare. Family physicians could deploy AI to predict survival in serious illness which is a particularly difficult task given the breadth of diseases encountered in primary care. Little research exists to inform whether survival estimation tools are welcome in primary care to manage serious illness prognostication. To address this gap, we elicited the perspectives of family medicine residents on the potential use of AI to help them predict survival (i.e., time expected) for their patients with serious illness. Our qualitative study draws on semi-structured interview data from 18 family medicine residents in Canada. We used a pragmatic framework to conduct our analysis, employing principles of constructivist grounded theory. We identified that family medicine residents were receptive to AI survival estimation for serious illness management, particularly for supporting their delivery of expert advice over a broad range of clinical topics. However, caring for patients with serious illness in primary care involves more than survival estimation, with such a tool having likely only limited applicability to end of life. Summarizing these perspectives, we identified four themes: (1) improving patient care with AI, (2) AI with a grain of salt, (3) patient-driven use of AI, and (4) augmenting, not replacing family physicians. Thus, survival estimation with AI for serious illness has potential clinical value in primary care. In addition to survival, pertinent challenges to address with AI include understanding of expected function, maximizing quality of life, and response to interventions, in addition to quantifying survival time. Future prognostication models should consider use of additional patient-centered outcomes and modifying the outcomes predicted based on prediction timepoints. To successfully deploy these technologies in primary care, additional education and role modelling of technology use is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 7\",\"pages\":\"e0000917\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12212547/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人工智能技术在医学领域的迅速发展,需要研究如何将人工智能应用于医疗保健领域。家庭医生可以利用人工智能来预测重病患者的生存,考虑到初级保健中遇到的疾病的广度,这是一项特别困难的任务。很少有研究表明生存估计工具在初级保健中是否受欢迎,以管理严重疾病的预后。为了解决这一差距,我们征求了家庭医学居民对人工智能的潜在使用的看法,以帮助他们预测患有严重疾病的患者的生存(即预期时间)。我们的定性研究采用了半结构化的访谈数据,来自加拿大18位家庭医学居民。我们使用了一个语用框架来进行分析,运用了建构主义理论的原则。我们发现,家庭医学住院医师接受严重疾病管理的人工智能生存估计,特别是支持他们就广泛的临床主题提供专家建议。然而,在初级保健中护理严重疾病患者涉及的不仅仅是生存估计,这种工具对生命终结的适用性可能有限。总结这些观点,我们确定了四个主题:(1)用人工智能改善患者护理,(2)人工智能带有一种盐,(3)患者驱动的人工智能使用,以及(4)增强而不是取代家庭医生。因此,用人工智能估计严重疾病的生存在初级保健中具有潜在的临床价值。除了生存之外,人工智能需要解决的相关挑战包括了解预期功能,最大限度地提高生活质量,以及对干预措施的反应,以及量化生存时间。未来的预测模型应考虑使用额外的以患者为中心的结果,并根据预测时间点修改预测的结果。为了在初级保健中成功地部署这些技术,需要对技术使用进行额外的教育和树立榜样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives of family medicine residents on artificial intelligence for survival estimation in patients with serious illness.

As technology for artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has rapidly proliferated, research is needed on how AI should be used in healthcare. Family physicians could deploy AI to predict survival in serious illness which is a particularly difficult task given the breadth of diseases encountered in primary care. Little research exists to inform whether survival estimation tools are welcome in primary care to manage serious illness prognostication. To address this gap, we elicited the perspectives of family medicine residents on the potential use of AI to help them predict survival (i.e., time expected) for their patients with serious illness. Our qualitative study draws on semi-structured interview data from 18 family medicine residents in Canada. We used a pragmatic framework to conduct our analysis, employing principles of constructivist grounded theory. We identified that family medicine residents were receptive to AI survival estimation for serious illness management, particularly for supporting their delivery of expert advice over a broad range of clinical topics. However, caring for patients with serious illness in primary care involves more than survival estimation, with such a tool having likely only limited applicability to end of life. Summarizing these perspectives, we identified four themes: (1) improving patient care with AI, (2) AI with a grain of salt, (3) patient-driven use of AI, and (4) augmenting, not replacing family physicians. Thus, survival estimation with AI for serious illness has potential clinical value in primary care. In addition to survival, pertinent challenges to address with AI include understanding of expected function, maximizing quality of life, and response to interventions, in addition to quantifying survival time. Future prognostication models should consider use of additional patient-centered outcomes and modifying the outcomes predicted based on prediction timepoints. To successfully deploy these technologies in primary care, additional education and role modelling of technology use is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信