Patrícia Pereira Duzi Carvalho, Nelson Augusto Alves
{"title":"DPP4受体在SARS-CoV进入中的作用:来自对接和分子动力学模拟的见解","authors":"Patrícia Pereira Duzi Carvalho, Nelson Augusto Alves","doi":"10.1002/prot.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protein-receptor interactions play a critical role in viral entry and pathogenesis. While ACE2 is the primary receptor for SARS-CoV, the role of DPP4 as potential coreceptor remains underexplored. This study investigates the binding mechanisms and dissociation dynamics of the SARS-CoV/DPP4, SARS-CoV/ACE2 and MERS-CoV/DPP4 complexes using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. The SARS-CoV/DPP4 complex exhibited the highest free-energy barrier ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>F</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6.77</mn> <mspace></mspace> <msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>B</mi></msub> <mi>T</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\Delta F=6.77\\kern0.1em {k}_BT $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ), suggesting significant stability despite being energetically unfavorable. In contrast, the MERS-CoV/DPP4 complex, with the lowest free-energy barrier ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>F</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.17</mn> <mspace></mspace> <msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>B</mi></msub> <mi>T</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\Delta F=2.17\\kern0.1em {k}_BT $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ), was the most likely to form and the least resistant to dissociation. The SARS-CoV/ACE2 complex demonstrated the highest <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>Q</mi> <mtext>bound</mtext></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {Q}_{\\mathrm{bound}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , reflecting well-organized interfacial side chains that facilitate hydrogen bonding, yet its relatively low free-energy barrier and dissociation temperature made it prone to dissociation. These findings highlight an inverse relationship between electrostatic complementarity and protein-protein complex stability, where increased electrostatic complementarity correlates with reduced stability due to frustration from competing interactions. While DPP4 may serve as a coreceptor for SARS-CoV, its interaction is constrained by significant energy barriers, suggesting it may only occur under specific biological conditions or alternative binding pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":56271,"journal":{"name":"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of the DPP4 Receptor in SARS-CoV Entry: Insights From Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.\",\"authors\":\"Patrícia Pereira Duzi Carvalho, Nelson Augusto Alves\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prot.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Protein-receptor interactions play a critical role in viral entry and pathogenesis. While ACE2 is the primary receptor for SARS-CoV, the role of DPP4 as potential coreceptor remains underexplored. This study investigates the binding mechanisms and dissociation dynamics of the SARS-CoV/DPP4, SARS-CoV/ACE2 and MERS-CoV/DPP4 complexes using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. The SARS-CoV/DPP4 complex exhibited the highest free-energy barrier ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>F</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6.77</mn> <mspace></mspace> <msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>B</mi></msub> <mi>T</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\Delta F=6.77\\\\kern0.1em {k}_BT $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ), suggesting significant stability despite being energetically unfavorable. In contrast, the MERS-CoV/DPP4 complex, with the lowest free-energy barrier ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>F</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.17</mn> <mspace></mspace> <msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>B</mi></msub> <mi>T</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\Delta F=2.17\\\\kern0.1em {k}_BT $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ), was the most likely to form and the least resistant to dissociation. The SARS-CoV/ACE2 complex demonstrated the highest <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>Q</mi> <mtext>bound</mtext></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {Q}_{\\\\mathrm{bound}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , reflecting well-organized interfacial side chains that facilitate hydrogen bonding, yet its relatively low free-energy barrier and dissociation temperature made it prone to dissociation. These findings highlight an inverse relationship between electrostatic complementarity and protein-protein complex stability, where increased electrostatic complementarity correlates with reduced stability due to frustration from competing interactions. While DPP4 may serve as a coreceptor for SARS-CoV, its interaction is constrained by significant energy barriers, suggesting it may only occur under specific biological conditions or alternative binding pathways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.70011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
蛋白质-受体相互作用在病毒进入和发病机制中起关键作用。虽然ACE2是SARS-CoV的主要受体,但DPP4作为潜在的辅助受体的作用仍未得到充分探索。本研究通过分子对接和分子动力学模拟研究了SARS-CoV/DPP4、SARS-CoV/ACE2和MERS-CoV/DPP4复合物的结合机制和解离动力学。SARS-CoV/DPP4复合物表现出最高的自由能势垒(Δ F = 6.77 k B T $$ \Delta F=6.77\kern0.1em {k}_BT $$),表明尽管能量不利,但具有显著的稳定性。相比之下,MERS-CoV/DPP4复合物具有最低的自由能垒(Δ F = 2.17 k B T $$ \Delta F=2.17\kern0.1em {k}_BT $$),最容易形成且最不耐解离。SARS-CoV/ACE2复合物显示出最高的Q键$$ {Q}_{\mathrm{bound}} $$,反映了组织良好的界面侧链,有助于氢键,但其相对较低的自由能势垒和解离温度使其易于解离。这些发现强调了静电互补性和蛋白质-蛋白质复合物稳定性之间的反比关系,其中静电互补性的增加与由于竞争相互作用的挫折而降低的稳定性相关。虽然DPP4可能作为SARS-CoV的辅助受体,但其相互作用受到明显的能量障碍的限制,这表明它可能仅在特定的生物条件或其他结合途径下发生。
Role of the DPP4 Receptor in SARS-CoV Entry: Insights From Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Protein-receptor interactions play a critical role in viral entry and pathogenesis. While ACE2 is the primary receptor for SARS-CoV, the role of DPP4 as potential coreceptor remains underexplored. This study investigates the binding mechanisms and dissociation dynamics of the SARS-CoV/DPP4, SARS-CoV/ACE2 and MERS-CoV/DPP4 complexes using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. The SARS-CoV/DPP4 complex exhibited the highest free-energy barrier ( ), suggesting significant stability despite being energetically unfavorable. In contrast, the MERS-CoV/DPP4 complex, with the lowest free-energy barrier ( ), was the most likely to form and the least resistant to dissociation. The SARS-CoV/ACE2 complex demonstrated the highest , reflecting well-organized interfacial side chains that facilitate hydrogen bonding, yet its relatively low free-energy barrier and dissociation temperature made it prone to dissociation. These findings highlight an inverse relationship between electrostatic complementarity and protein-protein complex stability, where increased electrostatic complementarity correlates with reduced stability due to frustration from competing interactions. While DPP4 may serve as a coreceptor for SARS-CoV, its interaction is constrained by significant energy barriers, suggesting it may only occur under specific biological conditions or alternative binding pathways.
期刊介绍:
PROTEINS : Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics publishes original reports of significant experimental and analytic research in all areas of protein research: structure, function, computation, genetics, and design. The journal encourages reports that present new experimental or computational approaches for interpreting and understanding data from biophysical chemistry, structural studies of proteins and macromolecular assemblies, alterations of protein structure and function engineered through techniques of molecular biology and genetics, functional analyses under physiologic conditions, as well as the interactions of proteins with receptors, nucleic acids, or other specific ligands or substrates. Research in protein and peptide biochemistry directed toward synthesizing or characterizing molecules that simulate aspects of the activity of proteins, or that act as inhibitors of protein function, is also within the scope of PROTEINS. In addition to full-length reports, short communications (usually not more than 4 printed pages) and prediction reports are welcome. Reviews are typically by invitation; authors are encouraged to submit proposed topics for consideration.