根据循环标准,参与器官捐赠或移植的卫生保健提供者对死后心脏捐赠的看法:一项定性研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kimia Honarmand, Ian Ball, Maureen O Meade, Aimee Sarti, Danielle LeBlanc, John Basmaji, Emilie P Belley-Côté, Michaël Chassé, Frédérick D'Aragon, Gordon Guyatt, Bram Rochwerg, Sam D Shemie, Robert Sibbald, Marat Slessarev, Mathew J Weiss, Jeanna Parsons Leigh
{"title":"根据循环标准,参与器官捐赠或移植的卫生保健提供者对死后心脏捐赠的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Kimia Honarmand, Ian Ball, Maureen O Meade, Aimee Sarti, Danielle LeBlanc, John Basmaji, Emilie P Belley-Côté, Michaël Chassé, Frédérick D'Aragon, Gordon Guyatt, Bram Rochwerg, Sam D Shemie, Robert Sibbald, Marat Slessarev, Mathew J Weiss, Jeanna Parsons Leigh","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02979-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cardiac donation after death determination by circulatory criteria (DCC) can be performed using either 1) direct procurement and perfusion of ex situ organs or 2) normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Nevertheless, there are concerns regarding the acceptability and ethics of these procedures, particularly NRP in which the blood supply to the brain is surgically interrupted and circulation in the thorax and abdomen is restored prior to heart retrieval. We aimed to understand the perspectives on cardiac donation following DCC of Canadian clinicians who are involved in donation and transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a qualitative descriptive study of 75 clinicians to better understand the perspectives of physicians on cardiac DCC. We purposively sampled clinicians who care for organ donors (N = 51) and those who care for transplant recipients (N = 24) in Canada. We performed thematic analysis to generate themes describing participants' perspectives about cardiac DCC and its implementation in Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the broad support and interest to implement cardiac DCC among the cohort of clinicians interviewed was tempered by their anticipation that other clinicians, donor families, and the public would be less supportive. Donor clinicians were particularly concerned about potential erosion in public trust in the organ donation system as a whole. Participants identified opportunities to address anticipated challenges, including strategies for education and communication around cardiac DCC, staged/gradual introduction of cardiac DCC, and the option for stakeholders (clinicians, donor families, potential transplant recipients) to opt out of participation in cardiac DCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this qualitative study of clinicians involved in organ donation or transplantation across Canada, we found broad support for cardiac DCC. Nevertheless, we observed several challenges with the implementation of cardiac DCC, particularly concerns of nonsupport by other stakeholders. Participants also identified opportunities to address anticipated barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of health care providers involved in organ donation or transplantation on cardiac donation after death by circulatory criteria: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Kimia Honarmand, Ian Ball, Maureen O Meade, Aimee Sarti, Danielle LeBlanc, John Basmaji, Emilie P Belley-Côté, Michaël Chassé, Frédérick D'Aragon, Gordon Guyatt, Bram Rochwerg, Sam D Shemie, Robert Sibbald, Marat Slessarev, Mathew J Weiss, Jeanna Parsons Leigh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12630-025-02979-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cardiac donation after death determination by circulatory criteria (DCC) can be performed using either 1) direct procurement and perfusion of ex situ organs or 2) normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Nevertheless, there are concerns regarding the acceptability and ethics of these procedures, particularly NRP in which the blood supply to the brain is surgically interrupted and circulation in the thorax and abdomen is restored prior to heart retrieval. We aimed to understand the perspectives on cardiac donation following DCC of Canadian clinicians who are involved in donation and transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a qualitative descriptive study of 75 clinicians to better understand the perspectives of physicians on cardiac DCC. We purposively sampled clinicians who care for organ donors (N = 51) and those who care for transplant recipients (N = 24) in Canada. We performed thematic analysis to generate themes describing participants' perspectives about cardiac DCC and its implementation in Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the broad support and interest to implement cardiac DCC among the cohort of clinicians interviewed was tempered by their anticipation that other clinicians, donor families, and the public would be less supportive. Donor clinicians were particularly concerned about potential erosion in public trust in the organ donation system as a whole. Participants identified opportunities to address anticipated challenges, including strategies for education and communication around cardiac DCC, staged/gradual introduction of cardiac DCC, and the option for stakeholders (clinicians, donor families, potential transplant recipients) to opt out of participation in cardiac DCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this qualitative study of clinicians involved in organ donation or transplantation across Canada, we found broad support for cardiac DCC. Nevertheless, we observed several challenges with the implementation of cardiac DCC, particularly concerns of nonsupport by other stakeholders. Participants also identified opportunities to address anticipated barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02979-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02979-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过循环标准(DCC)确定死亡后心脏捐赠可以采用1)直接获取和灌注离地器官或2)常温区域灌注(NRP)。然而,人们对这些手术的可接受性和伦理性表示关切,特别是在取心之前,在手术中中断大脑的血液供应,恢复胸腔和腹部的循环。我们的目的是了解加拿大临床医生参与心脏捐赠和移植后DCC的观点。方法:我们对75名临床医生进行了定性描述性研究,以更好地了解医生对心脏DCC的看法。我们有目的地在加拿大对照顾器官捐赠者(N = 51)和照顾移植受者(N = 24)的临床医生进行抽样调查。我们进行了主题分析,以产生描述参与者对心脏DCC及其在加拿大实施的观点的主题。结果:我们发现,在接受采访的临床医生队列中,实施心脏DCC的广泛支持和兴趣被他们对其他临床医生、供体家庭和公众不太支持的预期所缓和。捐赠临床医生特别担心公众对整个器官捐赠系统的信任可能受到侵蚀。与会者确定了解决预期挑战的机会,包括围绕心脏DCC的教育和沟通策略,分阶段/逐步引入心脏DCC,以及利益相关者(临床医生,供体家庭,潜在移植受者)选择退出心脏DCC的选择。结论:在加拿大参与器官捐赠或移植的临床医生的定性研究中,我们发现心脏DCC得到广泛支持。然而,我们观察到实施心脏DCC的一些挑战,特别是其他利益相关者不支持的问题。与会者还确定了解决预期障碍的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of health care providers involved in organ donation or transplantation on cardiac donation after death by circulatory criteria: a qualitative study.

Purpose: Cardiac donation after death determination by circulatory criteria (DCC) can be performed using either 1) direct procurement and perfusion of ex situ organs or 2) normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Nevertheless, there are concerns regarding the acceptability and ethics of these procedures, particularly NRP in which the blood supply to the brain is surgically interrupted and circulation in the thorax and abdomen is restored prior to heart retrieval. We aimed to understand the perspectives on cardiac donation following DCC of Canadian clinicians who are involved in donation and transplantation.

Methods: We performed a qualitative descriptive study of 75 clinicians to better understand the perspectives of physicians on cardiac DCC. We purposively sampled clinicians who care for organ donors (N = 51) and those who care for transplant recipients (N = 24) in Canada. We performed thematic analysis to generate themes describing participants' perspectives about cardiac DCC and its implementation in Canada.

Results: We found that the broad support and interest to implement cardiac DCC among the cohort of clinicians interviewed was tempered by their anticipation that other clinicians, donor families, and the public would be less supportive. Donor clinicians were particularly concerned about potential erosion in public trust in the organ donation system as a whole. Participants identified opportunities to address anticipated challenges, including strategies for education and communication around cardiac DCC, staged/gradual introduction of cardiac DCC, and the option for stakeholders (clinicians, donor families, potential transplant recipients) to opt out of participation in cardiac DCC.

Conclusions: In this qualitative study of clinicians involved in organ donation or transplantation across Canada, we found broad support for cardiac DCC. Nevertheless, we observed several challenges with the implementation of cardiac DCC, particularly concerns of nonsupport by other stakeholders. Participants also identified opportunities to address anticipated barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信