Carmine De Angelis, Martina Pagliuca, Emanuela Magnolfi, Mauro Mansutti, Zelmira Ballatore, Michelino De Laurentiis, Roberto Bordonaro, Vita Leonardi, Dario Bruzzese, Roberta Caputo, Anna Maria Mosconi, Saverio Cinieri, Alessandra Fabi, Lucia Del Mastro, Fabio Puglisi, Sabino De Placido, Mario Giuliano, Grazia Arpino
{"title":"曲妥珠单抗加拉帕替尼或化疗治疗her2过表达晚期乳腺癌患者:一项随机II期试验(GIM12-TYPHER)","authors":"Carmine De Angelis, Martina Pagliuca, Emanuela Magnolfi, Mauro Mansutti, Zelmira Ballatore, Michelino De Laurentiis, Roberto Bordonaro, Vita Leonardi, Dario Bruzzese, Roberta Caputo, Anna Maria Mosconi, Saverio Cinieri, Alessandra Fabi, Lucia Del Mastro, Fabio Puglisi, Sabino De Placido, Mario Giuliano, Grazia Arpino","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is a standard treatment for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer in later lines. Lapatinib and trastuzumab have also demonstrated efficacy. This study assessed the efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life (QoL) of trastuzumab plus lapatinib (with endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive cases) versus trastuzumab with physician-selected chemotherapy in patients previously treated with at least two anti-HER2 regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label, multicenter phase II trial, 59 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either trastuzumab and lapatinib (Arm A) or trastuzumab with chemotherapy (Arm B). The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as confirmed complete response, partial response, or stable disease for ≥24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), QoL, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a median follow-up of 57.5 months, the CBR was 20.7% in Arm A and 26.7% in Arm B (p=0.76). The ORR was 13.8% vs. 20.0% (p=0.73), and median PFS was 3.6 months in Arm A vs. 6.1 months in Arm B (HR 0.63; p=0.08). Median OS was 29.9 vs. 31.1 months (HR 1.07; p=0.82). Adverse events occurred in 86.2% (Arm A) and 66.7% (Arm B) of patients, with grade 3-4 events in 24.1% and 13.3%, respectively. QoL favored Arm A (p=0.03). Due to early study closure and limited sample size, all results should be considered exploratory and not powered to assess definitive treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While efficacy differences were not significant, trastuzumab with lapatinib showed better QoL despite higher adverse event rates, suggesting it may be a viable chemotherapy-free option for pretreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trastuzumab plus lapatinib or chemotherapy in patients with HER2-overexpressed advanced breast cancer: a randomized, phase II trial (GIM12-TYPHER).\",\"authors\":\"Carmine De Angelis, Martina Pagliuca, Emanuela Magnolfi, Mauro Mansutti, Zelmira Ballatore, Michelino De Laurentiis, Roberto Bordonaro, Vita Leonardi, Dario Bruzzese, Roberta Caputo, Anna Maria Mosconi, Saverio Cinieri, Alessandra Fabi, Lucia Del Mastro, Fabio Puglisi, Sabino De Placido, Mario Giuliano, Grazia Arpino\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is a standard treatment for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer in later lines. Lapatinib and trastuzumab have also demonstrated efficacy. This study assessed the efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life (QoL) of trastuzumab plus lapatinib (with endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive cases) versus trastuzumab with physician-selected chemotherapy in patients previously treated with at least two anti-HER2 regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label, multicenter phase II trial, 59 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either trastuzumab and lapatinib (Arm A) or trastuzumab with chemotherapy (Arm B). The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as confirmed complete response, partial response, or stable disease for ≥24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), QoL, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a median follow-up of 57.5 months, the CBR was 20.7% in Arm A and 26.7% in Arm B (p=0.76). The ORR was 13.8% vs. 20.0% (p=0.73), and median PFS was 3.6 months in Arm A vs. 6.1 months in Arm B (HR 0.63; p=0.08). Median OS was 29.9 vs. 31.1 months (HR 1.07; p=0.82). Adverse events occurred in 86.2% (Arm A) and 66.7% (Arm B) of patients, with grade 3-4 events in 24.1% and 13.3%, respectively. QoL favored Arm A (p=0.03). Due to early study closure and limited sample size, all results should be considered exploratory and not powered to assess definitive treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While efficacy differences were not significant, trastuzumab with lapatinib showed better QoL despite higher adverse event rates, suggesting it may be a viable chemotherapy-free option for pretreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:曲妥珠单抗联合化疗是晚期her2阳性晚期乳腺癌的标准治疗方法。拉帕替尼和曲妥珠单抗也显示出疗效。本研究评估了曲妥珠单抗联合拉帕替尼(激素受体阳性病例的内分泌治疗)与曲妥珠单抗联合医生选择化疗的疗效、毒性和生活质量(QoL),这些患者先前接受过至少两种抗her2方案的治疗。方法:在这项开放标签、多中心的II期试验中,59名患者按1:1的比例随机分配,接受曲妥珠单抗联合拉帕替尼(A组)或曲妥珠单抗联合化疗(B组)。主要终点是临床获益率(CBR),定义为确认完全缓解、部分缓解或疾病稳定≥24周。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总缓解率(ORR)、生活质量(QoL)和安全性。结果:中位随访57.5个月,a组CBR为20.7%,B组为26.7% (p=0.76)。ORR为13.8% vs. 20.0% (p=0.73), A组的中位PFS为3.6个月,B组为6.1个月(HR 0.63;p = 0.08)。中位OS为29.9 vs. 31.1个月(HR 1.07;p = 0.82)。不良事件发生率分别为86.2% (A组)和66.7% (B组),3-4级不良事件发生率分别为24.1%和13.3%。A组的生活质量较好(p=0.03)。由于早期研究结束和样本量有限,所有结果应被认为是探索性的,不能用于评估确定的治疗效果。结论:虽然疗效差异不显著,但曲妥珠单抗与拉帕替尼的生活质量更好,尽管不良事件发生率更高,这表明曲妥珠单抗与拉帕替尼可能是治疗前her2阳性晚期乳腺癌的一种可行的无化疗选择。
Trastuzumab plus lapatinib or chemotherapy in patients with HER2-overexpressed advanced breast cancer: a randomized, phase II trial (GIM12-TYPHER).
Background: Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is a standard treatment for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer in later lines. Lapatinib and trastuzumab have also demonstrated efficacy. This study assessed the efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life (QoL) of trastuzumab plus lapatinib (with endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive cases) versus trastuzumab with physician-selected chemotherapy in patients previously treated with at least two anti-HER2 regimens.
Methods: In this open-label, multicenter phase II trial, 59 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either trastuzumab and lapatinib (Arm A) or trastuzumab with chemotherapy (Arm B). The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as confirmed complete response, partial response, or stable disease for ≥24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), QoL, and safety.
Results: With a median follow-up of 57.5 months, the CBR was 20.7% in Arm A and 26.7% in Arm B (p=0.76). The ORR was 13.8% vs. 20.0% (p=0.73), and median PFS was 3.6 months in Arm A vs. 6.1 months in Arm B (HR 0.63; p=0.08). Median OS was 29.9 vs. 31.1 months (HR 1.07; p=0.82). Adverse events occurred in 86.2% (Arm A) and 66.7% (Arm B) of patients, with grade 3-4 events in 24.1% and 13.3%, respectively. QoL favored Arm A (p=0.03). Due to early study closure and limited sample size, all results should be considered exploratory and not powered to assess definitive treatment effects.
Conclusion: While efficacy differences were not significant, trastuzumab with lapatinib showed better QoL despite higher adverse event rates, suggesting it may be a viable chemotherapy-free option for pretreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.