胃腺癌切除术患者化疗的时机和临床意义:一项基于人群的队列研究。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-07-02 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf179
Di Zhang, Qian Yang, Chunwang Ji, Xue Zhang, Xinyu Song, Zhaodi Nan, Qian Xu, Shulun Nie, Jianyuan Zhou, Jiahui Chu, Liliang Dou, Fan Jiang, Jianqiao Jiao, Qinqin Hu, Xuehui Wu, Song Li, Lian Liu
{"title":"胃腺癌切除术患者化疗的时机和临床意义:一项基于人群的队列研究。","authors":"Di Zhang, Qian Yang, Chunwang Ji, Xue Zhang, Xinyu Song, Zhaodi Nan, Qian Xu, Shulun Nie, Jianyuan Zhou, Jiahui Chu, Liliang Dou, Fan Jiang, Jianqiao Jiao, Qinqin Hu, Xuehui Wu, Song Li, Lian Liu","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was to assess the impact of chemotherapy sequence on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing gastrectomy and identify optimal chemotherapy timing along with potential candidates.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data on patients who underwent gastrectomy was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Treatment strategies were categorized into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and perioperative chemotherapy (PC), with subsequent analyses of clinical outcomes. Stable inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) and subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate significance of chemotherapy timing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4914 patients, 38.4% received NAC, 45% received AC, and 16.6% received PC. The 5-year OS rates for the entire cohort were 41.2%. Although no significant differences were observed between NAC and AC, PC exhibited a substantial improvement in OS compared to both. Multivariate analysis highlighted chemotherapy timing as a prognostic factor for OS. Even after sIPTW, PC still demonstrated significantly longer OS compared to NAC and AC, and this trend persisted across almost all subgroups. Even after patients undergoing NAC and gastrectomy, AC remained essential. Notably, potential candidates exempt from AC were identified, including patients aged ≥65 years and those with tumor grades I-II.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chemotherapy timing was independent prognostic factors for resected GC. PC presented as a promising strategy, displaying superior OS compared to both NAC and AC. However, older individuals and those with well-differentiated tumors could considered exempt from further AC after receiving NAC and gastrectomy. Further research is needed to validate these findings and optimize GC management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing and Clinical Significance of Chemotherapy in Patients with Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Population-based Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Di Zhang, Qian Yang, Chunwang Ji, Xue Zhang, Xinyu Song, Zhaodi Nan, Qian Xu, Shulun Nie, Jianyuan Zhou, Jiahui Chu, Liliang Dou, Fan Jiang, Jianqiao Jiao, Qinqin Hu, Xuehui Wu, Song Li, Lian Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was to assess the impact of chemotherapy sequence on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing gastrectomy and identify optimal chemotherapy timing along with potential candidates.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data on patients who underwent gastrectomy was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Treatment strategies were categorized into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and perioperative chemotherapy (PC), with subsequent analyses of clinical outcomes. Stable inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) and subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate significance of chemotherapy timing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4914 patients, 38.4% received NAC, 45% received AC, and 16.6% received PC. The 5-year OS rates for the entire cohort were 41.2%. Although no significant differences were observed between NAC and AC, PC exhibited a substantial improvement in OS compared to both. Multivariate analysis highlighted chemotherapy timing as a prognostic factor for OS. Even after sIPTW, PC still demonstrated significantly longer OS compared to NAC and AC, and this trend persisted across almost all subgroups. Even after patients undergoing NAC and gastrectomy, AC remained essential. Notably, potential candidates exempt from AC were identified, including patients aged ≥65 years and those with tumor grades I-II.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chemotherapy timing was independent prognostic factors for resected GC. PC presented as a promising strategy, displaying superior OS compared to both NAC and AC. However, older individuals and those with well-differentiated tumors could considered exempt from further AC after receiving NAC and gastrectomy. Further research is needed to validate these findings and optimize GC management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf179\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估化疗顺序对胃癌(GC)行胃切除术患者预后的影响,并确定最佳化疗时间和潜在的候选时间。患者和方法:从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中提取胃切除术患者的数据。采用Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归分析评估总生存期(OS)的预后因素。治疗策略分为新辅助化疗(NAC)、辅助化疗(AC)和围手术期化疗(PC),并对临床结果进行分析。采用稳定治疗加权逆概率(sIPTW)和亚组分析来评价化疗时机的意义。结果:4914例患者中,38.4%接受NAC治疗,45%接受AC治疗,16.6%接受PC治疗。整个队列的5年总生存率为41.2%。尽管NAC和AC之间没有明显差异,但PC在操作系统方面比两者都有显著改善。多变量分析强调化疗时间是OS的预后因素。即使在sIPTW之后,与NAC和AC相比,PC仍然表现出明显更长的操作系统,并且这种趋势几乎在所有亚组中都持续存在。即使在患者接受NAC和胃切除术后,AC仍然是必不可少的。值得注意的是,确定了可免除AC的潜在候选患者,包括年龄≥65岁的患者和肿瘤分级为I-II的患者。结论:化疗时机是胃癌切除术的独立预后因素。与NAC和AC相比,PC被认为是一种很有前景的策略,具有更好的OS。然而,老年人和肿瘤分化良好的患者在接受NAC和胃切除术后可以考虑免除进一步的AC。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现并优化GC管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Timing and Clinical Significance of Chemotherapy in Patients with Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Population-based Cohort Study.

Background: This study was to assess the impact of chemotherapy sequence on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing gastrectomy and identify optimal chemotherapy timing along with potential candidates.

Patients and methods: Data on patients who underwent gastrectomy was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Treatment strategies were categorized into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and perioperative chemotherapy (PC), with subsequent analyses of clinical outcomes. Stable inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) and subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate significance of chemotherapy timing.

Results: Among 4914 patients, 38.4% received NAC, 45% received AC, and 16.6% received PC. The 5-year OS rates for the entire cohort were 41.2%. Although no significant differences were observed between NAC and AC, PC exhibited a substantial improvement in OS compared to both. Multivariate analysis highlighted chemotherapy timing as a prognostic factor for OS. Even after sIPTW, PC still demonstrated significantly longer OS compared to NAC and AC, and this trend persisted across almost all subgroups. Even after patients undergoing NAC and gastrectomy, AC remained essential. Notably, potential candidates exempt from AC were identified, including patients aged ≥65 years and those with tumor grades I-II.

Conclusions: Chemotherapy timing was independent prognostic factors for resected GC. PC presented as a promising strategy, displaying superior OS compared to both NAC and AC. However, older individuals and those with well-differentiated tumors could considered exempt from further AC after receiving NAC and gastrectomy. Further research is needed to validate these findings and optimize GC management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信