Di Zhang, Qian Yang, Chunwang Ji, Xue Zhang, Xinyu Song, Zhaodi Nan, Qian Xu, Shulun Nie, Jianyuan Zhou, Jiahui Chu, Liliang Dou, Fan Jiang, Jianqiao Jiao, Qinqin Hu, Xuehui Wu, Song Li, Lian Liu
{"title":"胃腺癌切除术患者化疗的时机和临床意义:一项基于人群的队列研究。","authors":"Di Zhang, Qian Yang, Chunwang Ji, Xue Zhang, Xinyu Song, Zhaodi Nan, Qian Xu, Shulun Nie, Jianyuan Zhou, Jiahui Chu, Liliang Dou, Fan Jiang, Jianqiao Jiao, Qinqin Hu, Xuehui Wu, Song Li, Lian Liu","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was to assess the impact of chemotherapy sequence on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing gastrectomy and identify optimal chemotherapy timing along with potential candidates.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data on patients who underwent gastrectomy was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Treatment strategies were categorized into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and perioperative chemotherapy (PC), with subsequent analyses of clinical outcomes. Stable inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) and subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate significance of chemotherapy timing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4914 patients, 38.4% received NAC, 45% received AC, and 16.6% received PC. The 5-year OS rates for the entire cohort were 41.2%. Although no significant differences were observed between NAC and AC, PC exhibited a substantial improvement in OS compared to both. Multivariate analysis highlighted chemotherapy timing as a prognostic factor for OS. Even after sIPTW, PC still demonstrated significantly longer OS compared to NAC and AC, and this trend persisted across almost all subgroups. Even after patients undergoing NAC and gastrectomy, AC remained essential. Notably, potential candidates exempt from AC were identified, including patients aged ≥65 years and those with tumor grades I-II.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chemotherapy timing was independent prognostic factors for resected GC. PC presented as a promising strategy, displaying superior OS compared to both NAC and AC. However, older individuals and those with well-differentiated tumors could considered exempt from further AC after receiving NAC and gastrectomy. Further research is needed to validate these findings and optimize GC management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing and Clinical Significance of Chemotherapy in Patients with Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Population-based Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Di Zhang, Qian Yang, Chunwang Ji, Xue Zhang, Xinyu Song, Zhaodi Nan, Qian Xu, Shulun Nie, Jianyuan Zhou, Jiahui Chu, Liliang Dou, Fan Jiang, Jianqiao Jiao, Qinqin Hu, Xuehui Wu, Song Li, Lian Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was to assess the impact of chemotherapy sequence on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing gastrectomy and identify optimal chemotherapy timing along with potential candidates.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data on patients who underwent gastrectomy was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Treatment strategies were categorized into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and perioperative chemotherapy (PC), with subsequent analyses of clinical outcomes. Stable inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) and subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate significance of chemotherapy timing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4914 patients, 38.4% received NAC, 45% received AC, and 16.6% received PC. The 5-year OS rates for the entire cohort were 41.2%. Although no significant differences were observed between NAC and AC, PC exhibited a substantial improvement in OS compared to both. Multivariate analysis highlighted chemotherapy timing as a prognostic factor for OS. Even after sIPTW, PC still demonstrated significantly longer OS compared to NAC and AC, and this trend persisted across almost all subgroups. Even after patients undergoing NAC and gastrectomy, AC remained essential. Notably, potential candidates exempt from AC were identified, including patients aged ≥65 years and those with tumor grades I-II.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chemotherapy timing was independent prognostic factors for resected GC. PC presented as a promising strategy, displaying superior OS compared to both NAC and AC. However, older individuals and those with well-differentiated tumors could considered exempt from further AC after receiving NAC and gastrectomy. Further research is needed to validate these findings and optimize GC management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf179\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Timing and Clinical Significance of Chemotherapy in Patients with Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Population-based Cohort Study.
Background: This study was to assess the impact of chemotherapy sequence on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing gastrectomy and identify optimal chemotherapy timing along with potential candidates.
Patients and methods: Data on patients who underwent gastrectomy was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Treatment strategies were categorized into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and perioperative chemotherapy (PC), with subsequent analyses of clinical outcomes. Stable inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) and subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate significance of chemotherapy timing.
Results: Among 4914 patients, 38.4% received NAC, 45% received AC, and 16.6% received PC. The 5-year OS rates for the entire cohort were 41.2%. Although no significant differences were observed between NAC and AC, PC exhibited a substantial improvement in OS compared to both. Multivariate analysis highlighted chemotherapy timing as a prognostic factor for OS. Even after sIPTW, PC still demonstrated significantly longer OS compared to NAC and AC, and this trend persisted across almost all subgroups. Even after patients undergoing NAC and gastrectomy, AC remained essential. Notably, potential candidates exempt from AC were identified, including patients aged ≥65 years and those with tumor grades I-II.
Conclusions: Chemotherapy timing was independent prognostic factors for resected GC. PC presented as a promising strategy, displaying superior OS compared to both NAC and AC. However, older individuals and those with well-differentiated tumors could considered exempt from further AC after receiving NAC and gastrectomy. Further research is needed to validate these findings and optimize GC management.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.