Charlotta V Mulder, Elisabeth M Jongbloed, Marte C Liefaard, Stavros Makrodimitris, Daan M Hazelaar, Corine M Beaufort, Vanja de Weerd, Lennart Mulder, Carolien H M van Deurzen, Gabe S Sonke, Agnes Jager, Saskia M Wilting, John W M Martens, Maurice P H M Jansen, Esther H Lips
{"title":"四种游离DNA检测早期乳腺癌循环肿瘤DNA的比较研究。","authors":"Charlotta V Mulder, Elisabeth M Jongbloed, Marte C Liefaard, Stavros Makrodimitris, Daan M Hazelaar, Corine M Beaufort, Vanja de Weerd, Lennart Mulder, Carolien H M van Deurzen, Gabe S Sonke, Agnes Jager, Saskia M Wilting, John W M Martens, Maurice P H M Jansen, Esther H Lips","doi":"10.1186/s13058-025-02077-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early prediction of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) enables tailoring treatment strategies to the specific needs of individual breast cancer patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown to be a prognostic factor for response on NAC during treatment. However, at this point in time mostly tumor-informed ctDNA detection methods are used which are costly, have relatively long turnaround times and are subsequently potentially less feasible for widespread clinical application. In this study, we investigated four tumor-agnostic methods to determine their ability to accurately detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline. These methods were the Oncomine Breast cell free DNA (cfDNA) NGS panel, the LINE-1 sequencing assay mFAST-SeqS, shallow whole genome sequencing and the genome-wide methylation profiling assay MeD-Seq. In total 40 patients with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer were included and cell free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma before the start of NAC was analyzed with the four assays. We detected ctDNA in 3/24 (12.5%) patients with Oncomine, 5/40 (12.5%) with mFast-SeqS, 3/40 (7.7%) with low pass shallow WGS and 23/40 with MeD-Seq (57.5%). When all methods were combined ctDNA was detected in 65% of patients. In conclusion, we demonstrated that tumor agnostic methods, in particular MeD-Seq, can detect ctDNA in a fraction of the patients with early breast cancer, but further optimization is needed to reach the potential currently demonstrated by tumor-informed methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":49227,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research","volume":"27 1","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12217890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of four cell-free DNA assays for detecting circulating tumor DNA in early breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotta V Mulder, Elisabeth M Jongbloed, Marte C Liefaard, Stavros Makrodimitris, Daan M Hazelaar, Corine M Beaufort, Vanja de Weerd, Lennart Mulder, Carolien H M van Deurzen, Gabe S Sonke, Agnes Jager, Saskia M Wilting, John W M Martens, Maurice P H M Jansen, Esther H Lips\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13058-025-02077-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Early prediction of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) enables tailoring treatment strategies to the specific needs of individual breast cancer patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown to be a prognostic factor for response on NAC during treatment. However, at this point in time mostly tumor-informed ctDNA detection methods are used which are costly, have relatively long turnaround times and are subsequently potentially less feasible for widespread clinical application. In this study, we investigated four tumor-agnostic methods to determine their ability to accurately detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline. These methods were the Oncomine Breast cell free DNA (cfDNA) NGS panel, the LINE-1 sequencing assay mFAST-SeqS, shallow whole genome sequencing and the genome-wide methylation profiling assay MeD-Seq. In total 40 patients with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer were included and cell free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma before the start of NAC was analyzed with the four assays. We detected ctDNA in 3/24 (12.5%) patients with Oncomine, 5/40 (12.5%) with mFast-SeqS, 3/40 (7.7%) with low pass shallow WGS and 23/40 with MeD-Seq (57.5%). When all methods were combined ctDNA was detected in 65% of patients. In conclusion, we demonstrated that tumor agnostic methods, in particular MeD-Seq, can detect ctDNA in a fraction of the patients with early breast cancer, but further optimization is needed to reach the potential currently demonstrated by tumor-informed methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12217890/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02077-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02077-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
早期预测对新辅助化疗(NAC)的反应可以根据个体乳腺癌患者的具体需求定制治疗策略。循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)已被证明是NAC治疗期间疗效的预后因素。然而,在这个时间点上,大多数肿瘤信息的ctDNA检测方法是昂贵的,有相对较长的周转时间,随后可能不太可行,广泛的临床应用。在这项研究中,我们研究了四种肿瘤不可知方法,以确定它们在基线时准确检测循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)的能力。这些方法是Oncomine Breast cell free DNA (cfDNA) NGS面板,LINE-1测序法mFAST-SeqS,浅全基因组测序法和全基因组甲基化分析法MeD-Seq。共纳入40例三阴性或腔内B型乳腺癌患者,采用四项检测方法分析NAC开始前血浆游离细胞DNA (cfDNA)。我们在3/24(12.5%)的Oncomine患者中检测到ctDNA, mFast-SeqS检测到5/40(12.5%),低通浅WGS检测到3/40 (7.7%),MeD-Seq检测到23/40(57.5%)。当所有方法联合使用时,65%的患者检测到ctDNA。总之,我们证明了肿瘤不可知方法,特别是MeD-Seq,可以检测到一部分早期乳腺癌患者的ctDNA,但需要进一步优化才能达到目前肿瘤信息方法所显示的潜力。
A comparative study of four cell-free DNA assays for detecting circulating tumor DNA in early breast cancer.
Early prediction of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) enables tailoring treatment strategies to the specific needs of individual breast cancer patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown to be a prognostic factor for response on NAC during treatment. However, at this point in time mostly tumor-informed ctDNA detection methods are used which are costly, have relatively long turnaround times and are subsequently potentially less feasible for widespread clinical application. In this study, we investigated four tumor-agnostic methods to determine their ability to accurately detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline. These methods were the Oncomine Breast cell free DNA (cfDNA) NGS panel, the LINE-1 sequencing assay mFAST-SeqS, shallow whole genome sequencing and the genome-wide methylation profiling assay MeD-Seq. In total 40 patients with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer were included and cell free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma before the start of NAC was analyzed with the four assays. We detected ctDNA in 3/24 (12.5%) patients with Oncomine, 5/40 (12.5%) with mFast-SeqS, 3/40 (7.7%) with low pass shallow WGS and 23/40 with MeD-Seq (57.5%). When all methods were combined ctDNA was detected in 65% of patients. In conclusion, we demonstrated that tumor agnostic methods, in particular MeD-Seq, can detect ctDNA in a fraction of the patients with early breast cancer, but further optimization is needed to reach the potential currently demonstrated by tumor-informed methods.
期刊介绍:
Breast Cancer Research, an international, peer-reviewed online journal, publishes original research, reviews, editorials, and reports. It features open-access research articles of exceptional interest across all areas of biology and medicine relevant to breast cancer. This includes normal mammary gland biology, with a special emphasis on the genetic, biochemical, and cellular basis of breast cancer. In addition to basic research, the journal covers preclinical, translational, and clinical studies with a biological basis, including Phase I and Phase II trials.