COVID-19大流行期间姑息治疗患者访客限制对家庭成员和医疗保健提供者的影响:一项加拿大定性研究

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Natasha Hanson, Leanne Skerry, Morgan Nesbitt, Tracy Freeze, Robin Williams, Emily Love, Julia Wildish
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间姑息治疗患者访客限制对家庭成员和医疗保健提供者的影响:一项加拿大定性研究","authors":"Natasha Hanson, Leanne Skerry, Morgan Nesbitt, Tracy Freeze, Robin Williams, Emily Love, Julia Wildish","doi":"10.1186/s12904-025-01803-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Visitor restrictions to healthcare facilities were enacted throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic and changed over time. Further research on the consequences of restrictions, particularly in relation to palliative care and from multiple key stakeholder perspectives, is needed. We investigated the impact of COVID-19 visitor restrictions on family members of patients with a life limiting diagnosis or who received palliative care during the pandemic, and health care providers (HCPs) for patients with life limiting diagnoses within New Brunswick, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 family members and 11 HCPs. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to allow for the inductive generation of themes from the qualitative data, while investigating and comparing participants' experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis found that HCP and family member themes had a great deal of similarities. The themes developed for family members were: Visitor restrictions have negative impacts on palliative patients and their families; Visitor restrictions impacted patient-family care decisions and timing; Family members had more positive experiences when a patient-centred approach to care was used; Exceptions need to be made when it comes to palliative care and visitation; COVID restrictions didn't make sense; and, COVID led to healthcare providers being further overextended. HCP themes developed were: COVID restrictions and policies impacted satisfaction with work life; The impact of not visiting on families was terrible; HCP had to figure out new ways of providing care; We believe that patients need their families; Patients are lonely and miss family; Weren't always made clearly aware of the changes happening in hospital visitor restrictions; and, COVID restrictions led to people keeping loved ones at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results unveiled dynamic relationships between HCPs and family members, whose perspectives on the impacts of visitor restrictions overlapped. Main findings emphasized the overall negative impacts of visitor restrictions and a clear need to enact policies with a particular focus on understanding the need for a flexible patient and family-centred approach and quality of life considerations. Clear and consistent communication with all stakeholders regarding policies is recommended, as well as consistent exceptions for patients with life-limiting diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12217996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impacts of visitor restrictions for palliative patients during the COVID-19 pandemic on family members and healthcare providers: a Canadian qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Hanson, Leanne Skerry, Morgan Nesbitt, Tracy Freeze, Robin Williams, Emily Love, Julia Wildish\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12904-025-01803-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Visitor restrictions to healthcare facilities were enacted throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic and changed over time. Further research on the consequences of restrictions, particularly in relation to palliative care and from multiple key stakeholder perspectives, is needed. We investigated the impact of COVID-19 visitor restrictions on family members of patients with a life limiting diagnosis or who received palliative care during the pandemic, and health care providers (HCPs) for patients with life limiting diagnoses within New Brunswick, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 family members and 11 HCPs. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to allow for the inductive generation of themes from the qualitative data, while investigating and comparing participants' experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis found that HCP and family member themes had a great deal of similarities. The themes developed for family members were: Visitor restrictions have negative impacts on palliative patients and their families; Visitor restrictions impacted patient-family care decisions and timing; Family members had more positive experiences when a patient-centred approach to care was used; Exceptions need to be made when it comes to palliative care and visitation; COVID restrictions didn't make sense; and, COVID led to healthcare providers being further overextended. HCP themes developed were: COVID restrictions and policies impacted satisfaction with work life; The impact of not visiting on families was terrible; HCP had to figure out new ways of providing care; We believe that patients need their families; Patients are lonely and miss family; Weren't always made clearly aware of the changes happening in hospital visitor restrictions; and, COVID restrictions led to people keeping loved ones at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results unveiled dynamic relationships between HCPs and family members, whose perspectives on the impacts of visitor restrictions overlapped. Main findings emphasized the overall negative impacts of visitor restrictions and a clear need to enact policies with a particular focus on understanding the need for a flexible patient and family-centred approach and quality of life considerations. Clear and consistent communication with all stakeholders regarding policies is recommended, as well as consistent exceptions for patients with life-limiting diagnoses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12217996/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01803-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01803-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,对医疗机构的访客限制一直在实施,并随着时间的推移而改变。需要从多个关键利益攸关方的角度进一步研究限制的后果,特别是与姑息治疗有关的后果。在加拿大新不伦瑞克省,我们调查了COVID-19访客限制对诊断为限制生命或在大流行期间接受姑息治疗的患者的家庭成员以及诊断为限制生命的患者的医疗保健提供者(HCPs)的影响。方法:对12名患者家属和11名医护人员进行半结构化访谈。反身性主题分析用于从定性数据中归纳出主题,同时调查和比较参与者的经历。结果:分析发现HCP与家庭成员主题有很大的相似之处。为家属制定的主题是:访客限制对姑息治疗患者及其家属产生负面影响;访客限制影响了患者家庭护理的决定和时间安排;当采用以病人为中心的护理方法时,家庭成员有更积极的体验;当涉及到姑息治疗和探视时,需要做出例外;COVID限制没有意义;而且,COVID导致医疗保健提供者进一步过度扩张。开发的HCP主题是:COVID限制和政策影响工作生活满意度;不去拜访对家庭的影响是可怕的;HCP必须想出提供护理的新方法;我们相信病人需要他们的家人;病人孤独,想念家人;我们并不总是清楚地意识到医院探视限制的变化;此外,新冠肺炎限制措施导致人们将亲人留在家中。结论:研究结果揭示了HCPs与家庭成员之间的动态关系,家庭成员对访客限制影响的看法是重叠的。主要调查结果强调了访客限制的总体负面影响,明确需要制定政策,特别侧重于了解灵活的以病人和家庭为中心的方法和生活质量考虑的必要性。建议与所有利益攸关方就政策进行明确和一致的沟通,并对患有限制生命的诊断的患者规定一致的例外情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impacts of visitor restrictions for palliative patients during the COVID-19 pandemic on family members and healthcare providers: a Canadian qualitative study.

Background: Visitor restrictions to healthcare facilities were enacted throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic and changed over time. Further research on the consequences of restrictions, particularly in relation to palliative care and from multiple key stakeholder perspectives, is needed. We investigated the impact of COVID-19 visitor restrictions on family members of patients with a life limiting diagnosis or who received palliative care during the pandemic, and health care providers (HCPs) for patients with life limiting diagnoses within New Brunswick, Canada.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 family members and 11 HCPs. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to allow for the inductive generation of themes from the qualitative data, while investigating and comparing participants' experiences.

Results: The analysis found that HCP and family member themes had a great deal of similarities. The themes developed for family members were: Visitor restrictions have negative impacts on palliative patients and their families; Visitor restrictions impacted patient-family care decisions and timing; Family members had more positive experiences when a patient-centred approach to care was used; Exceptions need to be made when it comes to palliative care and visitation; COVID restrictions didn't make sense; and, COVID led to healthcare providers being further overextended. HCP themes developed were: COVID restrictions and policies impacted satisfaction with work life; The impact of not visiting on families was terrible; HCP had to figure out new ways of providing care; We believe that patients need their families; Patients are lonely and miss family; Weren't always made clearly aware of the changes happening in hospital visitor restrictions; and, COVID restrictions led to people keeping loved ones at home.

Conclusions: Results unveiled dynamic relationships between HCPs and family members, whose perspectives on the impacts of visitor restrictions overlapped. Main findings emphasized the overall negative impacts of visitor restrictions and a clear need to enact policies with a particular focus on understanding the need for a flexible patient and family-centred approach and quality of life considerations. Clear and consistent communication with all stakeholders regarding policies is recommended, as well as consistent exceptions for patients with life-limiting diagnoses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信