晚期癌症患者的决策偏好:与社会人口学和心理因素的关系

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Caterina Calderon, Ana Fernández-Montes, Marina Gustems, Lucia Roncero, Jesús Peña-López, Elena Asensio-Martínez, Mar Muñoz-Sánchez, Paula Jimenez-Fonseca
{"title":"晚期癌症患者的决策偏好:与社会人口学和心理因素的关系","authors":"Caterina Calderon, Ana Fernández-Montes, Marina Gustems, Lucia Roncero, Jesús Peña-López, Elena Asensio-Martínez, Mar Muñoz-Sánchez, Paula Jimenez-Fonseca","doi":"10.1186/s12904-025-01806-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with advanced cancer often wish to be involved in medical decisions but may vary according to sociodemographic and clinical factors. This study examined how these variables relate to patients' preferred roles in decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1198 advanced cancer patients were collected via self-administered questionnaires and clinical records. The Control Preferences Scale was used to classify patients into three profiles: Patient Control (decisions mainly made by the patient), Shared Control (decisions made jointly with the physician), and Physician Control (decisions primarily led by the physician). Associations with sociodemographic and psychological variables were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants, 53% were in the Patient Control group, 10% in the Shared Control group, and 37% in the Physician Control group. Sociodemographic variables were significantly associated with decision-making profiles: men and participants with higher education (secondary or above) were more represented in the Physician Control group (41% and 43%), while women and unemployed participants predominated in the Patient Control group (both 57%). In contrast, clinical variables such as tumor site, treatment type, and disease stage showed no significant associations. Regarding psychological characteristics, the Physician Control group reported lower levels of distress and higher levels of positive adjustment (p <.05) compared to the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decision-making preferences among advanced cancer patients depend predominantly on sociodemographic and psychological factors, rather than clinical variables. Patients deferring decisions to physicians experience lower distress and better psychological adjustment. Personalized communication informed by patient background and coping styles may improve patient-centered care and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-Making preferences in advanced cancer patients: associations with sociodemographic and psychological factors.\",\"authors\":\"Caterina Calderon, Ana Fernández-Montes, Marina Gustems, Lucia Roncero, Jesús Peña-López, Elena Asensio-Martínez, Mar Muñoz-Sánchez, Paula Jimenez-Fonseca\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12904-025-01806-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with advanced cancer often wish to be involved in medical decisions but may vary according to sociodemographic and clinical factors. This study examined how these variables relate to patients' preferred roles in decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1198 advanced cancer patients were collected via self-administered questionnaires and clinical records. The Control Preferences Scale was used to classify patients into three profiles: Patient Control (decisions mainly made by the patient), Shared Control (decisions made jointly with the physician), and Physician Control (decisions primarily led by the physician). Associations with sociodemographic and psychological variables were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants, 53% were in the Patient Control group, 10% in the Shared Control group, and 37% in the Physician Control group. Sociodemographic variables were significantly associated with decision-making profiles: men and participants with higher education (secondary or above) were more represented in the Physician Control group (41% and 43%), while women and unemployed participants predominated in the Patient Control group (both 57%). In contrast, clinical variables such as tumor site, treatment type, and disease stage showed no significant associations. Regarding psychological characteristics, the Physician Control group reported lower levels of distress and higher levels of positive adjustment (p <.05) compared to the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decision-making preferences among advanced cancer patients depend predominantly on sociodemographic and psychological factors, rather than clinical variables. Patients deferring decisions to physicians experience lower distress and better psychological adjustment. Personalized communication informed by patient background and coping styles may improve patient-centered care and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211197/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01806-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01806-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:晚期癌症患者通常希望参与医疗决策,但可能因社会人口统计学和临床因素而异。本研究考察了这些变量如何与患者在决策中的首选角色相关。方法:采用自填问卷和临床资料收集1198例晚期肿瘤患者资料。使用控制偏好量表将患者分为三种类型:患者控制(主要由患者做出决定),共享控制(与医生共同做出决定)和医生控制(主要由医生主导决定)。分析与社会人口学和心理变量的关系。结果:在参与者中,53%为患者对照组,10%为共享对照组,37%为医生对照组。社会人口学变量与决策档案显著相关:男性和受过高等教育(中等或以上)的参与者在医生对照组中更有代表性(41%和43%),而女性和失业参与者在患者对照组中占主导地位(均为57%)。相比之下,临床变量如肿瘤部位、治疗类型和疾病分期无显著相关性。结论:晚期癌症患者的决策偏好主要取决于社会人口学和心理因素,而不是临床变量。将决定推迟给医生的患者会经历更少的痛苦和更好的心理调整。根据患者背景和应对方式进行个性化沟通,可以改善以患者为中心的护理和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision-Making preferences in advanced cancer patients: associations with sociodemographic and psychological factors.

Background: Patients with advanced cancer often wish to be involved in medical decisions but may vary according to sociodemographic and clinical factors. This study examined how these variables relate to patients' preferred roles in decision-making.

Methods: Data from 1198 advanced cancer patients were collected via self-administered questionnaires and clinical records. The Control Preferences Scale was used to classify patients into three profiles: Patient Control (decisions mainly made by the patient), Shared Control (decisions made jointly with the physician), and Physician Control (decisions primarily led by the physician). Associations with sociodemographic and psychological variables were analyzed.

Results: Among participants, 53% were in the Patient Control group, 10% in the Shared Control group, and 37% in the Physician Control group. Sociodemographic variables were significantly associated with decision-making profiles: men and participants with higher education (secondary or above) were more represented in the Physician Control group (41% and 43%), while women and unemployed participants predominated in the Patient Control group (both 57%). In contrast, clinical variables such as tumor site, treatment type, and disease stage showed no significant associations. Regarding psychological characteristics, the Physician Control group reported lower levels of distress and higher levels of positive adjustment (p <.05) compared to the other groups.

Conclusion: Decision-making preferences among advanced cancer patients depend predominantly on sociodemographic and psychological factors, rather than clinical variables. Patients deferring decisions to physicians experience lower distress and better psychological adjustment. Personalized communication informed by patient background and coping styles may improve patient-centered care and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信