{"title":"局部氨甲环酸在髋关节和膝关节手术中的应用:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。","authors":"Saran Tantavisut, Sanzhar Artykbay, Pasawiss Tangwiwat, Paweena Susantitaphong","doi":"10.1530/EOR-2024-0152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) to systemic administration (intravenous and oral) and placebo in hip and knee surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus to compare the bleeding, hospitality, and morbidity between topical tranexamic acid with systemic administration of TXA and placebo. Random-effect models and meta-regressions were used to generate pooled estimates and assess heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty RCTs with 13,969 patients were identified reporting on the outcomes of using topical tranexamic acid in hip fracture surgery, hip arthroplasty and knee arthroplasty compared with intravenous, oral, and placebo. Overall, topical TXA acid decreased total blood loss (-353 mL (95% CI: -395, -311), P < 0.001), drainage volume (-239.802 mL (95% CI: -298.744, -180.859), P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (-14.994 mL (95% CI: -34.370, 4.382), P < 0.001), hidden blood loss (-123.711 mL (95% CI: -153.703, -93.719), P < 0.001), total hemoglobin loss (-0.970 gr/dL (95% CI: -1.289, -0.651), P < 0.001), total hematocrit loss (-0.937 (95% CI: -1.289, -0.584), P < 0.001), and blood transfusion rate (RR diff.: 0.480 (95% CI: 0.386, 0.597), P < 0.001) compared to placebo. No significant differences were observed between topical TXA and systemic routes (intravenous or oral) in total blood loss, transfusion rates, and hemoglobin levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topical TXA (intra-articular, peri-articular, or wound irrigation) significantly reduced blood loss, drain volume, hemoglobin loss, and transfusion need compared to placebo. Subgroup analysis showed that topical TXA outperformed placebo and was similar to intravenous and oral routes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"10 7","pages":"454-465"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical tranexamic acid in hip and knee surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Saran Tantavisut, Sanzhar Artykbay, Pasawiss Tangwiwat, Paweena Susantitaphong\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/EOR-2024-0152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) to systemic administration (intravenous and oral) and placebo in hip and knee surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus to compare the bleeding, hospitality, and morbidity between topical tranexamic acid with systemic administration of TXA and placebo. Random-effect models and meta-regressions were used to generate pooled estimates and assess heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty RCTs with 13,969 patients were identified reporting on the outcomes of using topical tranexamic acid in hip fracture surgery, hip arthroplasty and knee arthroplasty compared with intravenous, oral, and placebo. Overall, topical TXA acid decreased total blood loss (-353 mL (95% CI: -395, -311), P < 0.001), drainage volume (-239.802 mL (95% CI: -298.744, -180.859), P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (-14.994 mL (95% CI: -34.370, 4.382), P < 0.001), hidden blood loss (-123.711 mL (95% CI: -153.703, -93.719), P < 0.001), total hemoglobin loss (-0.970 gr/dL (95% CI: -1.289, -0.651), P < 0.001), total hematocrit loss (-0.937 (95% CI: -1.289, -0.584), P < 0.001), and blood transfusion rate (RR diff.: 0.480 (95% CI: 0.386, 0.597), P < 0.001) compared to placebo. No significant differences were observed between topical TXA and systemic routes (intravenous or oral) in total blood loss, transfusion rates, and hemoglobin levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topical TXA (intra-articular, peri-articular, or wound irrigation) significantly reduced blood loss, drain volume, hemoglobin loss, and transfusion need compared to placebo. Subgroup analysis showed that topical TXA outperformed placebo and was similar to intravenous and oral routes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"volume\":\"10 7\",\"pages\":\"454-465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232384/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2024-0152\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2024-0152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较局部氨甲环酸(TXA)与全身给药(静脉和口服)和安慰剂在髋关节和膝关节手术中的疗效和安全性。方法:本荟萃分析按照系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。在PubMed和Scopus中进行了系统的文献检索,比较局部氨甲环酸与全身给药TXA和安慰剂之间的出血、好客和发病率。随机效应模型和元回归用于产生汇总估计和评估异质性。结果:80项随机对照试验共13969例患者,报告了在髋部骨折手术、髋关节置换术和膝关节置换术中使用局部氨甲环酸与静脉注射、口服和安慰剂相比的结果。总的来说,局部酸酸性降低总失血(-353毫升(95%置信区间:-395、-311),P < 0.001),排水体积(-239.802毫升(95%置信区间CI: -298.744, -180.859), P < 0.001),术中失血(-14.994毫升(95%置信区间CI: -34.370, 4.382), P < 0.001),隐性失血(-123.711毫升(95%置信区间CI: -153.703, -93.719), P < 0.001),总血红蛋白损失(-0.970克/分升(95%置信区间CI: -1.289, -0.651), P < 0.001),总血球容积损失(-0.937(95%置信区间CI: -1.289, -0.584), P < 0.001),输血率(RR diff。0.480 (95% CI: 0.386, 0.597), P < 0.001)。在总失血量、输血率和血红蛋白水平方面,外用TXA和全身途径(静脉或口服)之间没有显著差异。结论:与安慰剂相比,局部TXA(关节内、关节周围或伤口冲洗)显著减少了失血量、排血量、血红蛋白损失和输血需求。亚组分析显示,局部TXA优于安慰剂,与静脉和口服途径相似。
Topical tranexamic acid in hip and knee surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) to systemic administration (intravenous and oral) and placebo in hip and knee surgeries.
Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus to compare the bleeding, hospitality, and morbidity between topical tranexamic acid with systemic administration of TXA and placebo. Random-effect models and meta-regressions were used to generate pooled estimates and assess heterogeneity.
Results: Eighty RCTs with 13,969 patients were identified reporting on the outcomes of using topical tranexamic acid in hip fracture surgery, hip arthroplasty and knee arthroplasty compared with intravenous, oral, and placebo. Overall, topical TXA acid decreased total blood loss (-353 mL (95% CI: -395, -311), P < 0.001), drainage volume (-239.802 mL (95% CI: -298.744, -180.859), P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (-14.994 mL (95% CI: -34.370, 4.382), P < 0.001), hidden blood loss (-123.711 mL (95% CI: -153.703, -93.719), P < 0.001), total hemoglobin loss (-0.970 gr/dL (95% CI: -1.289, -0.651), P < 0.001), total hematocrit loss (-0.937 (95% CI: -1.289, -0.584), P < 0.001), and blood transfusion rate (RR diff.: 0.480 (95% CI: 0.386, 0.597), P < 0.001) compared to placebo. No significant differences were observed between topical TXA and systemic routes (intravenous or oral) in total blood loss, transfusion rates, and hemoglobin levels.
Conclusion: Topical TXA (intra-articular, peri-articular, or wound irrigation) significantly reduced blood loss, drain volume, hemoglobin loss, and transfusion need compared to placebo. Subgroup analysis showed that topical TXA outperformed placebo and was similar to intravenous and oral routes.
期刊介绍:
EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity.
This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances.
One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress.
EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.