Gitte Frydenlund, Søren O'Neill, Ole Steen Mortensen, Jens Søndergaaard, Anders Hansen
{"title":"慢性腰痛患者的职业康复干预:范围回顾。","authors":"Gitte Frydenlund, Søren O'Neill, Ole Steen Mortensen, Jens Søndergaaard, Anders Hansen","doi":"10.1007/s10926-025-10308-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Clinical guidelines recommend multidisciplinary rehabilitation for managing chronic LBP. This scoping review maps vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions delivered within the healthcare sector for individuals with chronic LBP. It explores (1) which professional groups are involved and how they collaborate, (2) the setting, (3) the duration, intensity, and components of interventions, and (4) how work status is assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search across six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, OT Seeker, and Scopus) was conducted in September 2023 and updated in October 2024, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies were included if they involved working age individuals with chronic LBP receiving VR initiated within the healthcare sector. Articles published before 2013, from outside Europe, or with > 50% of participants on sick leave > 12 months were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7032 records, 26 articles representing 21 studies from seven European countries were included. Interventions varied in duration (1-12 weeks or until return-to-work (RTW) or a new plan was established), intensity (a few hours to 30 h/week), complexity, and follow-up periods (5 weeks to 5 years). Interdisciplinary collaboration was most common (six studies), although descriptions were limited. Interventions ranged from simple to complex, with up to seven components. Nineteen different methods were used to assess work status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial heterogeneity in intervention design and RTW outcome measures limits comparability and evidence synthesis. Clearer definitions of collaboration and standardized RTW reporting are needed to inform future development of VR in healthcare contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping Vocational Rehabilitation Interventions for People with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Gitte Frydenlund, Søren O'Neill, Ole Steen Mortensen, Jens Søndergaaard, Anders Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10926-025-10308-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Clinical guidelines recommend multidisciplinary rehabilitation for managing chronic LBP. This scoping review maps vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions delivered within the healthcare sector for individuals with chronic LBP. It explores (1) which professional groups are involved and how they collaborate, (2) the setting, (3) the duration, intensity, and components of interventions, and (4) how work status is assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search across six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, OT Seeker, and Scopus) was conducted in September 2023 and updated in October 2024, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies were included if they involved working age individuals with chronic LBP receiving VR initiated within the healthcare sector. Articles published before 2013, from outside Europe, or with > 50% of participants on sick leave > 12 months were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7032 records, 26 articles representing 21 studies from seven European countries were included. Interventions varied in duration (1-12 weeks or until return-to-work (RTW) or a new plan was established), intensity (a few hours to 30 h/week), complexity, and follow-up periods (5 weeks to 5 years). Interdisciplinary collaboration was most common (six studies), although descriptions were limited. Interventions ranged from simple to complex, with up to seven components. Nineteen different methods were used to assess work status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial heterogeneity in intervention design and RTW outcome measures limits comparability and evidence synthesis. Clearer definitions of collaboration and standardized RTW reporting are needed to inform future development of VR in healthcare contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-025-10308-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-025-10308-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mapping Vocational Rehabilitation Interventions for People with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review.
Purpose: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Clinical guidelines recommend multidisciplinary rehabilitation for managing chronic LBP. This scoping review maps vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions delivered within the healthcare sector for individuals with chronic LBP. It explores (1) which professional groups are involved and how they collaborate, (2) the setting, (3) the duration, intensity, and components of interventions, and (4) how work status is assessed.
Methods: A systematic search across six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, OT Seeker, and Scopus) was conducted in September 2023 and updated in October 2024, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies were included if they involved working age individuals with chronic LBP receiving VR initiated within the healthcare sector. Articles published before 2013, from outside Europe, or with > 50% of participants on sick leave > 12 months were excluded.
Results: Of 7032 records, 26 articles representing 21 studies from seven European countries were included. Interventions varied in duration (1-12 weeks or until return-to-work (RTW) or a new plan was established), intensity (a few hours to 30 h/week), complexity, and follow-up periods (5 weeks to 5 years). Interdisciplinary collaboration was most common (six studies), although descriptions were limited. Interventions ranged from simple to complex, with up to seven components. Nineteen different methods were used to assess work status.
Conclusion: Substantial heterogeneity in intervention design and RTW outcome measures limits comparability and evidence synthesis. Clearer definitions of collaboration and standardized RTW reporting are needed to inform future development of VR in healthcare contexts.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law. A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.