在三级转诊中心参加I期临床试验的头颈癌患者的临床概况。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359251337244
Daria Maria Filippini, Raphael Sanchez, Etienne Bastien, Nicolas Jacquin, Alexandro Paccapelo, Caroline Nhy, Jerzy Klijanienko, Valentin Calugaru, Anne Chilles, Wahib Ghanem, Guillaume Rougier, Antoine Dubray Vautrin, Nathalie Badois, Maria Lesnik, Olivier Choussy, Marie Paule Sablin, Christophe Le Tourneau, Grégoire Marret
{"title":"在三级转诊中心参加I期临床试验的头颈癌患者的临床概况。","authors":"Daria Maria Filippini, Raphael Sanchez, Etienne Bastien, Nicolas Jacquin, Alexandro Paccapelo, Caroline Nhy, Jerzy Klijanienko, Valentin Calugaru, Anne Chilles, Wahib Ghanem, Guillaume Rougier, Antoine Dubray Vautrin, Nathalie Badois, Maria Lesnik, Olivier Choussy, Marie Paule Sablin, Christophe Le Tourneau, Grégoire Marret","doi":"10.1177/17588359251337244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent advances in understanding the biology of cancer have resulted in an extensive armamentarium of new therapeutic agents, most often tested on various tumor types at the earliest stages of drug development. However, the clinical impact of these therapies on patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) remains underexplored and requires further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles of patients with HNC enrolled in phase I trials (Ph1t) at a tertiary referral center over the last decade.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted, analyzing data from HNC patients enrolled in phase I trials at the Curie Institute between October 2011 and January 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on baseline characteristics, hematologic biomarkers, and outcomes were extracted from medical records. Objective response rate (ORR) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. A Cox model was used for the identification of prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty patients were enrolled in Ph1t for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) setting (66.9%), including 20.8% of patients being treated with more than two lines of therapy, followed by locally advanced (LA) treated with radical surgery or exclusive chemo/radiotherapy (17.7%), neoadjuvant (10.0%), and adjuvant (5.4%) Ph1t. Patients were treated with immunotherapy (53.8%), targeted therapy (23.1%), bispecific antibody (8.5%), antibody-drug conjugate (4.6%), and other agents (10.0%). In 122 patients evaluable for response, ORR were 16.5%, 87.0%, and 92.3% in R/M, LA, and neoadjuvant Ph1t, respectively. Median PFS/OS rates were 2.0/8.3, 21.5/38.3, and 20.0/27.4 months in R/M, LA, and neoadjuvant Ph1t, respectively.At multivariable analysis, lower lymphocytes (HR = 0.144; 95% CI: 0.052-0.399; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower albumin levels (HR = 0.922; 95% CI: 0.879-0.966; <i>p</i> < 0.001) remained associated with poorer OS. Grade 3-4 adverse events were recorded in 27/130 patients (20.8%). The most frequent were hematologic and gastrointestinal disorders. No treatment-related deaths occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HNC Ph1t show encouraging results in terms of early efficacy signals and safety profiles, emphasizing their value across a variety of clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359251337244"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical landscape for patients with head and neck cancers enrolled in phase I trials at a tertiary referral center.\",\"authors\":\"Daria Maria Filippini, Raphael Sanchez, Etienne Bastien, Nicolas Jacquin, Alexandro Paccapelo, Caroline Nhy, Jerzy Klijanienko, Valentin Calugaru, Anne Chilles, Wahib Ghanem, Guillaume Rougier, Antoine Dubray Vautrin, Nathalie Badois, Maria Lesnik, Olivier Choussy, Marie Paule Sablin, Christophe Le Tourneau, Grégoire Marret\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17588359251337244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent advances in understanding the biology of cancer have resulted in an extensive armamentarium of new therapeutic agents, most often tested on various tumor types at the earliest stages of drug development. However, the clinical impact of these therapies on patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) remains underexplored and requires further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles of patients with HNC enrolled in phase I trials (Ph1t) at a tertiary referral center over the last decade.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted, analyzing data from HNC patients enrolled in phase I trials at the Curie Institute between October 2011 and January 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on baseline characteristics, hematologic biomarkers, and outcomes were extracted from medical records. Objective response rate (ORR) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. A Cox model was used for the identification of prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty patients were enrolled in Ph1t for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) setting (66.9%), including 20.8% of patients being treated with more than two lines of therapy, followed by locally advanced (LA) treated with radical surgery or exclusive chemo/radiotherapy (17.7%), neoadjuvant (10.0%), and adjuvant (5.4%) Ph1t. Patients were treated with immunotherapy (53.8%), targeted therapy (23.1%), bispecific antibody (8.5%), antibody-drug conjugate (4.6%), and other agents (10.0%). In 122 patients evaluable for response, ORR were 16.5%, 87.0%, and 92.3% in R/M, LA, and neoadjuvant Ph1t, respectively. Median PFS/OS rates were 2.0/8.3, 21.5/38.3, and 20.0/27.4 months in R/M, LA, and neoadjuvant Ph1t, respectively.At multivariable analysis, lower lymphocytes (HR = 0.144; 95% CI: 0.052-0.399; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower albumin levels (HR = 0.922; 95% CI: 0.879-0.966; <i>p</i> < 0.001) remained associated with poorer OS. Grade 3-4 adverse events were recorded in 27/130 patients (20.8%). The most frequent were hematologic and gastrointestinal disorders. No treatment-related deaths occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HNC Ph1t show encouraging results in terms of early efficacy signals and safety profiles, emphasizing their value across a variety of clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"17588359251337244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209567/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251337244\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251337244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近对癌症生物学的理解取得了进展,导致了大量新的治疗药物,大多数在药物开发的早期阶段对各种肿瘤类型进行了测试。然而,这些疗法对头颈癌(HNC)患者的临床影响仍未得到充分探讨,需要进一步评估。目的:研究在过去十年中,在三级转诊中心参加I期临床试验(Ph1t)的HNC患者的临床结果和毒性概况。设计:进行回顾性队列研究,分析2011年10月至2024年1月期间在居里研究所参加I期试验的HNC患者的数据。方法:从医疗记录中提取基线特征、血液学生物标志物和结果数据。分析客观缓解率(ORR)和Kaplan-Meier估计的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。采用Cox模型确定预后因素。结果:130例复发/转移(R/M)患者入组Ph1t(66.9%),其中20.8%的患者接受了2种以上的治疗,其次是局部晚期(LA)患者接受根治性手术或单独化疗/放疗(17.7%),新辅助(10.0%)和辅助(5.4%)Ph1t。患者接受免疫治疗(53.8%)、靶向治疗(23.1%)、双特异性抗体(8.5%)、抗体-药物偶联物(4.6%)和其他药物(10.0%)。在122例可评估缓解的患者中,R/M、LA和新辅助Ph1t的ORR分别为16.5%、87.0%和92.3%。R/M、LA和新辅助Ph1t的中位PFS/OS分别为2.0/8.3、21.5/38.3和20.0/27.4个月。在多变量分析中,低淋巴细胞(HR = 0.144;95% ci: 0.052-0.399;结论:HNC Ph1t在早期疗效信号和安全性方面显示出令人鼓舞的结果,强调了它们在各种临床环境中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical landscape for patients with head and neck cancers enrolled in phase I trials at a tertiary referral center.

Clinical landscape for patients with head and neck cancers enrolled in phase I trials at a tertiary referral center.

Clinical landscape for patients with head and neck cancers enrolled in phase I trials at a tertiary referral center.

Clinical landscape for patients with head and neck cancers enrolled in phase I trials at a tertiary referral center.

Background: Recent advances in understanding the biology of cancer have resulted in an extensive armamentarium of new therapeutic agents, most often tested on various tumor types at the earliest stages of drug development. However, the clinical impact of these therapies on patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) remains underexplored and requires further evaluation.

Objectives: To investigate the clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles of patients with HNC enrolled in phase I trials (Ph1t) at a tertiary referral center over the last decade.

Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, analyzing data from HNC patients enrolled in phase I trials at the Curie Institute between October 2011 and January 2024.

Methods: Data on baseline characteristics, hematologic biomarkers, and outcomes were extracted from medical records. Objective response rate (ORR) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. A Cox model was used for the identification of prognostic factors.

Results: One hundred and thirty patients were enrolled in Ph1t for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) setting (66.9%), including 20.8% of patients being treated with more than two lines of therapy, followed by locally advanced (LA) treated with radical surgery or exclusive chemo/radiotherapy (17.7%), neoadjuvant (10.0%), and adjuvant (5.4%) Ph1t. Patients were treated with immunotherapy (53.8%), targeted therapy (23.1%), bispecific antibody (8.5%), antibody-drug conjugate (4.6%), and other agents (10.0%). In 122 patients evaluable for response, ORR were 16.5%, 87.0%, and 92.3% in R/M, LA, and neoadjuvant Ph1t, respectively. Median PFS/OS rates were 2.0/8.3, 21.5/38.3, and 20.0/27.4 months in R/M, LA, and neoadjuvant Ph1t, respectively.At multivariable analysis, lower lymphocytes (HR = 0.144; 95% CI: 0.052-0.399; p < 0.001) and lower albumin levels (HR = 0.922; 95% CI: 0.879-0.966; p < 0.001) remained associated with poorer OS. Grade 3-4 adverse events were recorded in 27/130 patients (20.8%). The most frequent were hematologic and gastrointestinal disorders. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusion: HNC Ph1t show encouraging results in terms of early efficacy signals and safety profiles, emphasizing their value across a variety of clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信