基于机器学习的动静脉瘘患者狭窄预测方法。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yunghsin Chen, Wei-Tse Hsu, Christopher Chen, Wei-Ta Chen
{"title":"基于机器学习的动静脉瘘患者狭窄预测方法。","authors":"Yunghsin Chen, Wei-Tse Hsu, Christopher Chen, Wei-Ta Chen","doi":"10.1111/sdi.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the most ideal vascular access for hemodialysis. People with AVF have a longer vascular access survival rate and a lower complication rate. Thrombosis and stenosis are the most common complications of AVF. The annual thrombosis event rate is 10%-50%. Appropriate identification of AVF stenosis and management could reduce the risk of thrombosis and access loss. Guidelines recommended physical examinations as the first line of AVF stenosis monitoring. However, even for health professionals, the diagnosis rate by hearing the bruit varied. The sound waves of AVF can be recorded by electronic stethoscopes and the analysis of the digitalized signal may help predict stenosis of AVF and trigger the next step of management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, all dialysis patients with AVF referred to our angiography laboratory for AVF angiography were enrolled. Significant stenosis was defined as stenosis severity > 70% on angiography. The stenosis severities were measured before and after the angioplasty. Before and after the angioplasty/angiography, the sounds of AVF were digitally recorded by an electrical stethoscope. Two sections longer than 10 s were obtained at different sites for each recording. Seventy percent of all the data was used to train the machine learning algorithm. The other 30% was used for testing. For the output of the algorithm, the AVF stenosis severity was classified into significant stenosis or non-significant stenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled. Ninety-six patients were with significant stenotic AVF and the other 103 patients were with insignificant stenosis. One hundred eighty-nine recording sections for significant stenosis and 511 recording sections for insignificant stenosis were obtained. The machine learning artificial intelligence can classify the input sound waves as significant or insignificant stenosis with a 94.1% sensitivity rate and an 81.7% specificity rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Artificial intelligence can help predict AVF stenosis by analyzing the digitalized sound waves of AVF. This analysis is convenient and non-invasive. Moreover, this technique can help the development of a remote monitor of AVF stenosis, which is especially important in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":21675,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Method for Predict Stenosis of Arteriovenous Fistula Patients Based on Machine Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Yunghsin Chen, Wei-Tse Hsu, Christopher Chen, Wei-Ta Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sdi.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the most ideal vascular access for hemodialysis. People with AVF have a longer vascular access survival rate and a lower complication rate. Thrombosis and stenosis are the most common complications of AVF. The annual thrombosis event rate is 10%-50%. Appropriate identification of AVF stenosis and management could reduce the risk of thrombosis and access loss. Guidelines recommended physical examinations as the first line of AVF stenosis monitoring. However, even for health professionals, the diagnosis rate by hearing the bruit varied. The sound waves of AVF can be recorded by electronic stethoscopes and the analysis of the digitalized signal may help predict stenosis of AVF and trigger the next step of management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, all dialysis patients with AVF referred to our angiography laboratory for AVF angiography were enrolled. Significant stenosis was defined as stenosis severity > 70% on angiography. The stenosis severities were measured before and after the angioplasty. Before and after the angioplasty/angiography, the sounds of AVF were digitally recorded by an electrical stethoscope. Two sections longer than 10 s were obtained at different sites for each recording. Seventy percent of all the data was used to train the machine learning algorithm. The other 30% was used for testing. For the output of the algorithm, the AVF stenosis severity was classified into significant stenosis or non-significant stenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled. Ninety-six patients were with significant stenotic AVF and the other 103 patients were with insignificant stenosis. One hundred eighty-nine recording sections for significant stenosis and 511 recording sections for insignificant stenosis were obtained. The machine learning artificial intelligence can classify the input sound waves as significant or insignificant stenosis with a 94.1% sensitivity rate and an 81.7% specificity rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Artificial intelligence can help predict AVF stenosis by analyzing the digitalized sound waves of AVF. This analysis is convenient and non-invasive. Moreover, this technique can help the development of a remote monitor of AVF stenosis, which is especially important in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Dialysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.70001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:动静脉瘘(AVF)是血液透析最理想的血管通路。AVF患者的血管通路存活率较长,并发症发生率较低。血栓和狭窄是AVF最常见的并发症。年血栓事件发生率为10%-50%。正确识别和处理AVF狭窄可降低血栓形成和通路丧失的风险。指南推荐体格检查作为AVF狭窄监测的第一线。然而,即使是卫生专业人员,通过听到声音的诊断率也各不相同。电子听诊器可以记录AVF的声波,对数字化信号的分析有助于预测AVF的狭窄,并触发下一步的处理。方法:纳入2019年1月1日至2019年12月31日至我院血管造影实验室进行AVF血管造影的所有透析患者。明显狭窄定义为血管造影显示狭窄严重程度为bb0 - 70%。血管成形术前后测量狭窄程度。在血管成形术/血管造影前后,用电听诊器数字记录AVF的声音。每次记录在不同地点获得两个长度大于10 s的切片。所有数据的70%用于训练机器学习算法。另外30%用于测试。对于算法的输出,将AVF狭窄的严重程度分为显著狭窄和非显著狭窄。结果:199例患者入组。明显狭窄性AVF 96例,不明显狭窄103例。获得明显狭窄记录切片189个,不明显狭窄记录切片511个。机器学习人工智能可以将输入的声波分类为显著或不显著狭窄,灵敏度为94.1%,特异性为81.7%。结论:人工智能可以通过分析AVF数字化声波来预测AVF狭窄。这种分析方便且无创。此外,该技术有助于开发AVF狭窄的远程监测,这在COVID-19大流行时代尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Method for Predict Stenosis of Arteriovenous Fistula Patients Based on Machine Learning.

Objectives: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the most ideal vascular access for hemodialysis. People with AVF have a longer vascular access survival rate and a lower complication rate. Thrombosis and stenosis are the most common complications of AVF. The annual thrombosis event rate is 10%-50%. Appropriate identification of AVF stenosis and management could reduce the risk of thrombosis and access loss. Guidelines recommended physical examinations as the first line of AVF stenosis monitoring. However, even for health professionals, the diagnosis rate by hearing the bruit varied. The sound waves of AVF can be recorded by electronic stethoscopes and the analysis of the digitalized signal may help predict stenosis of AVF and trigger the next step of management.

Methods: From January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, all dialysis patients with AVF referred to our angiography laboratory for AVF angiography were enrolled. Significant stenosis was defined as stenosis severity > 70% on angiography. The stenosis severities were measured before and after the angioplasty. Before and after the angioplasty/angiography, the sounds of AVF were digitally recorded by an electrical stethoscope. Two sections longer than 10 s were obtained at different sites for each recording. Seventy percent of all the data was used to train the machine learning algorithm. The other 30% was used for testing. For the output of the algorithm, the AVF stenosis severity was classified into significant stenosis or non-significant stenosis.

Results: One hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled. Ninety-six patients were with significant stenotic AVF and the other 103 patients were with insignificant stenosis. One hundred eighty-nine recording sections for significant stenosis and 511 recording sections for insignificant stenosis were obtained. The machine learning artificial intelligence can classify the input sound waves as significant or insignificant stenosis with a 94.1% sensitivity rate and an 81.7% specificity rate.

Conclusions: Artificial intelligence can help predict AVF stenosis by analyzing the digitalized sound waves of AVF. This analysis is convenient and non-invasive. Moreover, this technique can help the development of a remote monitor of AVF stenosis, which is especially important in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Dialysis
Seminars in Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Dialysis is a bimonthly publication focusing exclusively on cutting-edge clinical aspects of dialysis therapy. Besides publishing papers by the most respected names in the field of dialysis, the Journal has unique useful features, all designed to keep you current: -Fellows Forum -Dialysis rounds -Editorials -Opinions -Briefly noted -Summary and Comment -Guest Edited Issues -Special Articles Virtually everything you read in Seminars in Dialysis is written or solicited by the editors after choosing the most effective of nine different editorial styles and formats. They know that facts, speculations, ''how-to-do-it'' information, opinions, and news reports all play important roles in your education and the patient care you provide. Alternate issues of the journal are guest edited and focus on a single clinical topic in dialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信