无创脑刺激技术联合运动干预对脑卒中后成人患者的有效性:系统综述。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sofia Straudi, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Elisa Vallin, Silvia Borsato, Michela Bozzolan, Marco Da Roit, Stefano G Lazzarini, Chiara Arienti
{"title":"无创脑刺激技术联合运动干预对脑卒中后成人患者的有效性:系统综述。","authors":"Sofia Straudi, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Elisa Vallin, Silvia Borsato, Michela Bozzolan, Marco Da Roit, Stefano G Lazzarini, Chiara Arienti","doi":"10.1016/j.neurom.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to provide an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) about the effectiveness of combining noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques with rehabilitation in adult patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The overview protocol has been prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021241226). Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2023. SRs investigating the effectiveness of NIBS techniques in addition to motor interventions compared with sham stimulation and the same motor interventions in adults with stroke were included. The methodologic quality of the included SRs was assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-2. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This overview included 13 SRs (85 primary studies, 2768 participants): Nine focused on arm and six on gait rehabilitation. The quality of the included SRs was low or critically low. The included SRs reported a high clinical heterogeneity for NIBS techniques and protocols or motor rehabilitation. Of the 42 outcomes assessed, two (4.7%) were judged as high-certainty evidence and referred to the lack of superiority of combining NIBS, especially transcranial direct current stimulation, with arm robotics for improving arm function. Moreover, 21 outcomes (50%) were judged as low-certainty evidence; they highlighted the way NIBS combined with rehabilitation can positively affect several functional domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even if no firm conclusions can be derived from the available literature owing to the quality of the included SRs and the heterogeneity of NIBS techniques and additional motor rehabilitation, some clinical indications have been provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":19152,"journal":{"name":"Neuromodulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Techniques Combined With Motor Interventions in Adult Patients After Stroke: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Straudi, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Elisa Vallin, Silvia Borsato, Michela Bozzolan, Marco Da Roit, Stefano G Lazzarini, Chiara Arienti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurom.2025.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to provide an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) about the effectiveness of combining noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques with rehabilitation in adult patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The overview protocol has been prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021241226). Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2023. SRs investigating the effectiveness of NIBS techniques in addition to motor interventions compared with sham stimulation and the same motor interventions in adults with stroke were included. The methodologic quality of the included SRs was assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-2. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This overview included 13 SRs (85 primary studies, 2768 participants): Nine focused on arm and six on gait rehabilitation. The quality of the included SRs was low or critically low. The included SRs reported a high clinical heterogeneity for NIBS techniques and protocols or motor rehabilitation. Of the 42 outcomes assessed, two (4.7%) were judged as high-certainty evidence and referred to the lack of superiority of combining NIBS, especially transcranial direct current stimulation, with arm robotics for improving arm function. Moreover, 21 outcomes (50%) were judged as low-certainty evidence; they highlighted the way NIBS combined with rehabilitation can positively affect several functional domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even if no firm conclusions can be derived from the available literature owing to the quality of the included SRs and the heterogeneity of NIBS techniques and additional motor rehabilitation, some clinical indications have been provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuromodulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuromodulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2025.05.004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuromodulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2025.05.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在综述无创脑刺激(NIBS)技术与成人脑卒中患者康复相结合的有效性。材料和方法:概述方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(CRD42021241226)上前瞻性注册。从成立到2023年12月检索了8个电子数据库。研究了NIBS技术和运动干预的有效性,并将其与假刺激和相同的运动干预在成人中风患者中进行了比较。使用评估系统评价的测量工具对纳入的SRs的方法学质量进行评估-2。证据的确定性通过分级推荐评估、发展和评价方法进行评估。结果:本综述包括13项sr(85项主要研究,2768名参与者):9项关注手臂康复,6项关注步态康复。纳入的SRs的质量较低或极低。纳入的SRs报告了NIBS技术和方案或运动康复的高度临床异质性。在评估的42个结局中,2个(4.7%)被判定为高确定性证据,并指出NIBS(特别是经颅直流电刺激)与手臂机器人相结合在改善手臂功能方面缺乏优势。此外,21个结局(50%)被判定为低确定性证据;他们强调了NIBS与康复相结合可以对几个功能领域产生积极影响的方式。结论:即使由于纳入的SRs的质量以及NIBS技术和额外运动康复的异质性,无法从现有文献中得出确切的结论,也提供了一些临床适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Techniques Combined With Motor Interventions in Adult Patients After Stroke: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Objective: This study aimed to provide an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) about the effectiveness of combining noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques with rehabilitation in adult patients with stroke.

Materials and methods: The overview protocol has been prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021241226). Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2023. SRs investigating the effectiveness of NIBS techniques in addition to motor interventions compared with sham stimulation and the same motor interventions in adults with stroke were included. The methodologic quality of the included SRs was assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-2. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

Results: This overview included 13 SRs (85 primary studies, 2768 participants): Nine focused on arm and six on gait rehabilitation. The quality of the included SRs was low or critically low. The included SRs reported a high clinical heterogeneity for NIBS techniques and protocols or motor rehabilitation. Of the 42 outcomes assessed, two (4.7%) were judged as high-certainty evidence and referred to the lack of superiority of combining NIBS, especially transcranial direct current stimulation, with arm robotics for improving arm function. Moreover, 21 outcomes (50%) were judged as low-certainty evidence; they highlighted the way NIBS combined with rehabilitation can positively affect several functional domains.

Conclusions: Even if no firm conclusions can be derived from the available literature owing to the quality of the included SRs and the heterogeneity of NIBS techniques and additional motor rehabilitation, some clinical indications have been provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuromodulation
Neuromodulation 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
978
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface is the preeminent journal in the area of neuromodulation, providing our readership with the state of the art clinical, translational, and basic science research in the field. For clinicians, engineers, scientists and members of the biotechnology industry alike, Neuromodulation provides timely and rigorously peer-reviewed articles on the technology, science, and clinical application of devices that interface with the nervous system to treat disease and improve function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信