血液恶性肿瘤和骨髓衰竭综合征患者生殖系易感性护理模式的设计、实施和评估。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lucy C Fox, Erin Goode, Nicole Den Elzen, Lin Cheng, Laura Barth, Kelsey Man, Anna Jarmolowicz, Mary Panjari, Stephanie Best, Karin Thursky, Paul James, Ashish Bajel, David Ritchie, Piers Blombery
{"title":"血液恶性肿瘤和骨髓衰竭综合征患者生殖系易感性护理模式的设计、实施和评估。","authors":"Lucy C Fox, Erin Goode, Nicole Den Elzen, Lin Cheng, Laura Barth, Kelsey Man, Anna Jarmolowicz, Mary Panjari, Stephanie Best, Karin Thursky, Paul James, Ashish Bajel, David Ritchie, Piers Blombery","doi":"10.1111/imj.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The bone marrow failure syndromes (BMFS) are clinically heterogeneous conditions with both inherited and acquired etiologies. Optimal care is often challenged by the complexity of these disorders and gaps in healthcare delivery. The Evaluating Multidisciplinary Bone maRrow fAilure CarE (EMBRACE) study is a multi-stage hybrid implementation-effectiveness study designed to explore the nature of issues faced by patients with BMFS and their physicians, and to develop, implement, and evaluate a comprehensive model of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify barriers to optimal BMFS care, we conducted semi-structured interviews with patients and patient advocates, followed by a nationwide survey of physicians involved in BMFS management. Thematic analysis was performed on interview data, and survey responses were analysed to identify common challenges and areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interview themes elicited included: (i) limited disease-specific awareness and resources, (ii) challenges in attaining genetic care, (iii) the ongoing impact of complex care needs, (iv) the perceived value of genetic testing, and (v) the importance of specialised healthcare professionals. Physician surveys indicated a desire for affordable genomic testing, assistance with result interpretation and genetic counselling/cascade testing of extended kindred, a forum for complex case discussion and advice regarding management strategies. Responses from patients, advocates and physicians, along with existing best-practice guidelines, were then used to develop a 10-component model of care aimed at addressing identified issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EMBRACE study has established a stakeholder-informed, multidisciplinary care framework for patients with BMFS. This care programme continues to undergo evaluation and audit consistent with principles of an implementation-effectiveness study to determine both patient and physician satisfaction, and iterative refinement to provide optimum care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design, implementation and evaluation of a model of care for patients with germline predisposition to haematological malignancy and bone marrow failure syndromes.\",\"authors\":\"Lucy C Fox, Erin Goode, Nicole Den Elzen, Lin Cheng, Laura Barth, Kelsey Man, Anna Jarmolowicz, Mary Panjari, Stephanie Best, Karin Thursky, Paul James, Ashish Bajel, David Ritchie, Piers Blombery\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.70125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The bone marrow failure syndromes (BMFS) are clinically heterogeneous conditions with both inherited and acquired etiologies. Optimal care is often challenged by the complexity of these disorders and gaps in healthcare delivery. The Evaluating Multidisciplinary Bone maRrow fAilure CarE (EMBRACE) study is a multi-stage hybrid implementation-effectiveness study designed to explore the nature of issues faced by patients with BMFS and their physicians, and to develop, implement, and evaluate a comprehensive model of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify barriers to optimal BMFS care, we conducted semi-structured interviews with patients and patient advocates, followed by a nationwide survey of physicians involved in BMFS management. Thematic analysis was performed on interview data, and survey responses were analysed to identify common challenges and areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interview themes elicited included: (i) limited disease-specific awareness and resources, (ii) challenges in attaining genetic care, (iii) the ongoing impact of complex care needs, (iv) the perceived value of genetic testing, and (v) the importance of specialised healthcare professionals. Physician surveys indicated a desire for affordable genomic testing, assistance with result interpretation and genetic counselling/cascade testing of extended kindred, a forum for complex case discussion and advice regarding management strategies. Responses from patients, advocates and physicians, along with existing best-practice guidelines, were then used to develop a 10-component model of care aimed at addressing identified issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EMBRACE study has established a stakeholder-informed, multidisciplinary care framework for patients with BMFS. This care programme continues to undergo evaluation and audit consistent with principles of an implementation-effectiveness study to determine both patient and physician satisfaction, and iterative refinement to provide optimum care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70125\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨髓衰竭综合征(BMFS)是临床上异质性的疾病,有遗传和获得性病因。这些疾病的复杂性和卫生保健服务的差距往往对最佳护理提出挑战。评估多学科骨髓衰竭治疗(EMBRACE)研究是一项多阶段实施-有效性混合研究,旨在探讨骨髓衰竭患者及其医生面临的问题的本质,并开发、实施和评估一种综合治疗模式。方法:为了确定最佳BMFS护理的障碍,我们对患者和患者倡导者进行了半结构化访谈,随后对参与BMFS管理的全国医生进行了调查。对访谈数据进行专题分析,并对调查结果进行分析,以确定共同的挑战和需要改进的领域。结果:访谈主题包括:(i)对特定疾病的认识和资源有限,(ii)获得遗传护理的挑战,(iii)复杂护理需求的持续影响,(iv)基因检测的感知价值,以及(v)专业医疗保健专业人员的重要性。医生调查表明,人们渴望负担得起的基因组检测,在结果解释和遗传咨询/扩展亲属级联检测方面的帮助,一个复杂病例讨论的论坛,以及有关管理策略的建议。然后,根据患者、倡导者和医生的反馈,以及现有的最佳实践指南,制定了一个由10个部分组成的护理模型,旨在解决已确定的问题。结论:EMBRACE研究为BMFS患者建立了一个利益相关者知情的多学科护理框架。根据实施有效性研究的原则,该护理方案将继续进行评估和审核,以确定患者和医生的满意度,并不断改进以提供最佳护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design, implementation and evaluation of a model of care for patients with germline predisposition to haematological malignancy and bone marrow failure syndromes.

Background: The bone marrow failure syndromes (BMFS) are clinically heterogeneous conditions with both inherited and acquired etiologies. Optimal care is often challenged by the complexity of these disorders and gaps in healthcare delivery. The Evaluating Multidisciplinary Bone maRrow fAilure CarE (EMBRACE) study is a multi-stage hybrid implementation-effectiveness study designed to explore the nature of issues faced by patients with BMFS and their physicians, and to develop, implement, and evaluate a comprehensive model of care.

Methods: To identify barriers to optimal BMFS care, we conducted semi-structured interviews with patients and patient advocates, followed by a nationwide survey of physicians involved in BMFS management. Thematic analysis was performed on interview data, and survey responses were analysed to identify common challenges and areas for improvement.

Results: Interview themes elicited included: (i) limited disease-specific awareness and resources, (ii) challenges in attaining genetic care, (iii) the ongoing impact of complex care needs, (iv) the perceived value of genetic testing, and (v) the importance of specialised healthcare professionals. Physician surveys indicated a desire for affordable genomic testing, assistance with result interpretation and genetic counselling/cascade testing of extended kindred, a forum for complex case discussion and advice regarding management strategies. Responses from patients, advocates and physicians, along with existing best-practice guidelines, were then used to develop a 10-component model of care aimed at addressing identified issues.

Conclusions: The EMBRACE study has established a stakeholder-informed, multidisciplinary care framework for patients with BMFS. This care programme continues to undergo evaluation and audit consistent with principles of an implementation-effectiveness study to determine both patient and physician satisfaction, and iterative refinement to provide optimum care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信