Raquel Teixeira, Cláudia de Freitas, Liuska Sanna, Eleonora Prina, Giulia Turrini, Amber S Brizar, Cătălin Gherdan, Evaldas Kazlauskas, Austėja Dumarkaitė, Henrik Wasmus, Leonie Fleck, Ulrich Reininghaus, Melanie Mack, Chiara Scarampi, Maritta Välimäki, Maija Satamo, Wietse A Tol
{"title":"与欧洲弱势群体共同制定促进和预防心理健康的干预措施:共同制定实施和参与性评价的混合方法研究方案。","authors":"Raquel Teixeira, Cláudia de Freitas, Liuska Sanna, Eleonora Prina, Giulia Turrini, Amber S Brizar, Cătălin Gherdan, Evaldas Kazlauskas, Austėja Dumarkaitė, Henrik Wasmus, Leonie Fleck, Ulrich Reininghaus, Melanie Mack, Chiara Scarampi, Maritta Välimäki, Maija Satamo, Wietse A Tol","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01349-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-creation has emerged as a crucial strategy for addressing complex public health challenges, including promotion and prevention of mental health concerns. While the evidence base for effective interventions continues to grow, significant gaps remain in their implementation and integration into real-world settings. Co-creation offers a valuable tool for strengthening mental health promotion strategies, ensuring that interventions are evidence-based, contextually relevant, culturally sensitive, sustainable and acceptable to those directly affected. However, there is a paucity of studies examining the evaluation of co-creation research, particularly regarding how participatory methods foster adaptation and influence outcomes and long-term sustainability. This protocol outlines a study designed to implement, evaluate and strengthen co-creation methodologies through a participatory and formative evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study adopts a mixed-methods design within the ADVANCE project, a multi-country initiative focused on co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations across seven European countries. End-users, healthcare professionals, and decision-makers will be engaged throughout the project in both intervention design and evaluation. Co-creation activities initiated with intervention scenario building and prioritization, drawing on desk reviews and online Delphi surveys co-developed with locally-set Society Advisory Groups (SAGs). The selection of intervention scenarios for implementation was performed using scenario-based workshops involving stakeholders in six partner countries. A second goal is to evaluate the co-creation process, which was co-designed in consultation with country teams and SAGs. A longitudinal qualitative study based on semistructured interviews with co-creators across two time points will be conducted, following the co-development of the interview guide through an online World Café.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study introduces an innovative approach by embedding participatory and formative evaluation into the co-creation process, enabling ongoing adaptation of co-creation activities. Through continuous stakeholder engagement, the project seeks to address barriers deriving from power imbalances, conflicting priorities, and resource limitations. Qualitative and participatory methods will be combined to elicit stakeholders' views, identify drawbacks and promote adjustments to ensure meaningful collaboration and reduce participation fatigue. Expected outcomes include actionable recommendations to inform policy, reduce stigma and foster the co-creation of more inclusive, effective, sustainable and scalable mental health promotion and prevention strategies across Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations in Europe: a mixed-methods study protocol for co-creation implementation and participatory evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Raquel Teixeira, Cláudia de Freitas, Liuska Sanna, Eleonora Prina, Giulia Turrini, Amber S Brizar, Cătălin Gherdan, Evaldas Kazlauskas, Austėja Dumarkaitė, Henrik Wasmus, Leonie Fleck, Ulrich Reininghaus, Melanie Mack, Chiara Scarampi, Maritta Välimäki, Maija Satamo, Wietse A Tol\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12961-025-01349-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-creation has emerged as a crucial strategy for addressing complex public health challenges, including promotion and prevention of mental health concerns. While the evidence base for effective interventions continues to grow, significant gaps remain in their implementation and integration into real-world settings. Co-creation offers a valuable tool for strengthening mental health promotion strategies, ensuring that interventions are evidence-based, contextually relevant, culturally sensitive, sustainable and acceptable to those directly affected. However, there is a paucity of studies examining the evaluation of co-creation research, particularly regarding how participatory methods foster adaptation and influence outcomes and long-term sustainability. This protocol outlines a study designed to implement, evaluate and strengthen co-creation methodologies through a participatory and formative evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study adopts a mixed-methods design within the ADVANCE project, a multi-country initiative focused on co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations across seven European countries. End-users, healthcare professionals, and decision-makers will be engaged throughout the project in both intervention design and evaluation. Co-creation activities initiated with intervention scenario building and prioritization, drawing on desk reviews and online Delphi surveys co-developed with locally-set Society Advisory Groups (SAGs). The selection of intervention scenarios for implementation was performed using scenario-based workshops involving stakeholders in six partner countries. A second goal is to evaluate the co-creation process, which was co-designed in consultation with country teams and SAGs. A longitudinal qualitative study based on semistructured interviews with co-creators across two time points will be conducted, following the co-development of the interview guide through an online World Café.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study introduces an innovative approach by embedding participatory and formative evaluation into the co-creation process, enabling ongoing adaptation of co-creation activities. Through continuous stakeholder engagement, the project seeks to address barriers deriving from power imbalances, conflicting priorities, and resource limitations. Qualitative and participatory methods will be combined to elicit stakeholders' views, identify drawbacks and promote adjustments to ensure meaningful collaboration and reduce participation fatigue. Expected outcomes include actionable recommendations to inform policy, reduce stigma and foster the co-creation of more inclusive, effective, sustainable and scalable mental health promotion and prevention strategies across Europe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01349-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01349-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations in Europe: a mixed-methods study protocol for co-creation implementation and participatory evaluation.
Background: Co-creation has emerged as a crucial strategy for addressing complex public health challenges, including promotion and prevention of mental health concerns. While the evidence base for effective interventions continues to grow, significant gaps remain in their implementation and integration into real-world settings. Co-creation offers a valuable tool for strengthening mental health promotion strategies, ensuring that interventions are evidence-based, contextually relevant, culturally sensitive, sustainable and acceptable to those directly affected. However, there is a paucity of studies examining the evaluation of co-creation research, particularly regarding how participatory methods foster adaptation and influence outcomes and long-term sustainability. This protocol outlines a study designed to implement, evaluate and strengthen co-creation methodologies through a participatory and formative evaluation approach.
Methods: This study adopts a mixed-methods design within the ADVANCE project, a multi-country initiative focused on co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations across seven European countries. End-users, healthcare professionals, and decision-makers will be engaged throughout the project in both intervention design and evaluation. Co-creation activities initiated with intervention scenario building and prioritization, drawing on desk reviews and online Delphi surveys co-developed with locally-set Society Advisory Groups (SAGs). The selection of intervention scenarios for implementation was performed using scenario-based workshops involving stakeholders in six partner countries. A second goal is to evaluate the co-creation process, which was co-designed in consultation with country teams and SAGs. A longitudinal qualitative study based on semistructured interviews with co-creators across two time points will be conducted, following the co-development of the interview guide through an online World Café.
Discussion: This study introduces an innovative approach by embedding participatory and formative evaluation into the co-creation process, enabling ongoing adaptation of co-creation activities. Through continuous stakeholder engagement, the project seeks to address barriers deriving from power imbalances, conflicting priorities, and resource limitations. Qualitative and participatory methods will be combined to elicit stakeholders' views, identify drawbacks and promote adjustments to ensure meaningful collaboration and reduce participation fatigue. Expected outcomes include actionable recommendations to inform policy, reduce stigma and foster the co-creation of more inclusive, effective, sustainable and scalable mental health promotion and prevention strategies across Europe.
期刊介绍:
Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.