与欧洲弱势群体共同制定促进和预防心理健康的干预措施:共同制定实施和参与性评价的混合方法研究方案。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Raquel Teixeira, Cláudia de Freitas, Liuska Sanna, Eleonora Prina, Giulia Turrini, Amber S Brizar, Cătălin Gherdan, Evaldas Kazlauskas, Austėja Dumarkaitė, Henrik Wasmus, Leonie Fleck, Ulrich Reininghaus, Melanie Mack, Chiara Scarampi, Maritta Välimäki, Maija Satamo, Wietse A Tol
{"title":"与欧洲弱势群体共同制定促进和预防心理健康的干预措施:共同制定实施和参与性评价的混合方法研究方案。","authors":"Raquel Teixeira, Cláudia de Freitas, Liuska Sanna, Eleonora Prina, Giulia Turrini, Amber S Brizar, Cătălin Gherdan, Evaldas Kazlauskas, Austėja Dumarkaitė, Henrik Wasmus, Leonie Fleck, Ulrich Reininghaus, Melanie Mack, Chiara Scarampi, Maritta Välimäki, Maija Satamo, Wietse A Tol","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01349-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-creation has emerged as a crucial strategy for addressing complex public health challenges, including promotion and prevention of mental health concerns. While the evidence base for effective interventions continues to grow, significant gaps remain in their implementation and integration into real-world settings. Co-creation offers a valuable tool for strengthening mental health promotion strategies, ensuring that interventions are evidence-based, contextually relevant, culturally sensitive, sustainable and acceptable to those directly affected. However, there is a paucity of studies examining the evaluation of co-creation research, particularly regarding how participatory methods foster adaptation and influence outcomes and long-term sustainability. This protocol outlines a study designed to implement, evaluate and strengthen co-creation methodologies through a participatory and formative evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study adopts a mixed-methods design within the ADVANCE project, a multi-country initiative focused on co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations across seven European countries. End-users, healthcare professionals, and decision-makers will be engaged throughout the project in both intervention design and evaluation. Co-creation activities initiated with intervention scenario building and prioritization, drawing on desk reviews and online Delphi surveys co-developed with locally-set Society Advisory Groups (SAGs). The selection of intervention scenarios for implementation was performed using scenario-based workshops involving stakeholders in six partner countries. A second goal is to evaluate the co-creation process, which was co-designed in consultation with country teams and SAGs. A longitudinal qualitative study based on semistructured interviews with co-creators across two time points will be conducted, following the co-development of the interview guide through an online World Café.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study introduces an innovative approach by embedding participatory and formative evaluation into the co-creation process, enabling ongoing adaptation of co-creation activities. Through continuous stakeholder engagement, the project seeks to address barriers deriving from power imbalances, conflicting priorities, and resource limitations. Qualitative and participatory methods will be combined to elicit stakeholders' views, identify drawbacks and promote adjustments to ensure meaningful collaboration and reduce participation fatigue. Expected outcomes include actionable recommendations to inform policy, reduce stigma and foster the co-creation of more inclusive, effective, sustainable and scalable mental health promotion and prevention strategies across Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations in Europe: a mixed-methods study protocol for co-creation implementation and participatory evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Raquel Teixeira, Cláudia de Freitas, Liuska Sanna, Eleonora Prina, Giulia Turrini, Amber S Brizar, Cătălin Gherdan, Evaldas Kazlauskas, Austėja Dumarkaitė, Henrik Wasmus, Leonie Fleck, Ulrich Reininghaus, Melanie Mack, Chiara Scarampi, Maritta Välimäki, Maija Satamo, Wietse A Tol\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12961-025-01349-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-creation has emerged as a crucial strategy for addressing complex public health challenges, including promotion and prevention of mental health concerns. While the evidence base for effective interventions continues to grow, significant gaps remain in their implementation and integration into real-world settings. Co-creation offers a valuable tool for strengthening mental health promotion strategies, ensuring that interventions are evidence-based, contextually relevant, culturally sensitive, sustainable and acceptable to those directly affected. However, there is a paucity of studies examining the evaluation of co-creation research, particularly regarding how participatory methods foster adaptation and influence outcomes and long-term sustainability. This protocol outlines a study designed to implement, evaluate and strengthen co-creation methodologies through a participatory and formative evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study adopts a mixed-methods design within the ADVANCE project, a multi-country initiative focused on co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations across seven European countries. End-users, healthcare professionals, and decision-makers will be engaged throughout the project in both intervention design and evaluation. Co-creation activities initiated with intervention scenario building and prioritization, drawing on desk reviews and online Delphi surveys co-developed with locally-set Society Advisory Groups (SAGs). The selection of intervention scenarios for implementation was performed using scenario-based workshops involving stakeholders in six partner countries. A second goal is to evaluate the co-creation process, which was co-designed in consultation with country teams and SAGs. A longitudinal qualitative study based on semistructured interviews with co-creators across two time points will be conducted, following the co-development of the interview guide through an online World Café.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study introduces an innovative approach by embedding participatory and formative evaluation into the co-creation process, enabling ongoing adaptation of co-creation activities. Through continuous stakeholder engagement, the project seeks to address barriers deriving from power imbalances, conflicting priorities, and resource limitations. Qualitative and participatory methods will be combined to elicit stakeholders' views, identify drawbacks and promote adjustments to ensure meaningful collaboration and reduce participation fatigue. Expected outcomes include actionable recommendations to inform policy, reduce stigma and foster the co-creation of more inclusive, effective, sustainable and scalable mental health promotion and prevention strategies across Europe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01349-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01349-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:共同创造已成为应对复杂公共卫生挑战(包括促进和预防精神卫生问题)的一项关键战略。虽然有效干预措施的证据基础不断增加,但在实施和融入现实环境方面仍存在重大差距。共同创造为加强精神卫生促进战略提供了一个宝贵的工具,确保干预措施以证据为基础,与具体情况相关,对文化敏感,可持续,并为直接受影响的人所接受。然而,审查共同创造研究的评价的研究很少,特别是关于参与式方法如何促进适应和影响结果和长期可持续性的研究。本议定书概述了一项旨在通过参与性和形成性评价方法实施、评价和加强共同创造方法的研究。方法:本研究在ADVANCE项目中采用混合方法设计,ADVANCE项目是一个多国倡议,重点是与七个欧洲国家的弱势群体共同创建心理健康促进和预防干预措施。最终用户、医疗保健专业人员和决策者将在整个项目中参与干预设计和评估。共同创造的活动包括干预方案的构建和优先排序,以及与当地社会咨询小组(sag)共同开发的桌上评论和在线德尔菲调查。六个伙伴国家的利益攸关方参加了基于场景的讲习班,选择了实施干预方案。第二个目标是评估共同创造过程,该过程是与国家工作队和sag协商后共同设计的。在通过在线世界咖啡馆共同开发访谈指南之后,将对两个时间点的共同创作者进行基于半结构化访谈的纵向定性研究。讨论:本研究引入了一种创新方法,将参与性和形成性评估嵌入到共同创造过程中,使共同创造活动能够持续适应。通过持续的涉众参与,项目寻求解决源于权力不平衡、优先级冲突和资源限制的障碍。定性和参与性方法将相结合,以征求利益相关者的意见,找出缺点并促进调整,以确保有意义的合作,减少参与疲劳。预期成果包括可采取行动的建议,为政策提供信息,减少耻辱,并促进在整个欧洲共同制定更具包容性、更有效、可持续和可扩展的精神卫生促进和预防战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations in Europe: a mixed-methods study protocol for co-creation implementation and participatory evaluation.

Co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations in Europe: a mixed-methods study protocol for co-creation implementation and participatory evaluation.

Co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations in Europe: a mixed-methods study protocol for co-creation implementation and participatory evaluation.

Co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations in Europe: a mixed-methods study protocol for co-creation implementation and participatory evaluation.

Background: Co-creation has emerged as a crucial strategy for addressing complex public health challenges, including promotion and prevention of mental health concerns. While the evidence base for effective interventions continues to grow, significant gaps remain in their implementation and integration into real-world settings. Co-creation offers a valuable tool for strengthening mental health promotion strategies, ensuring that interventions are evidence-based, contextually relevant, culturally sensitive, sustainable and acceptable to those directly affected. However, there is a paucity of studies examining the evaluation of co-creation research, particularly regarding how participatory methods foster adaptation and influence outcomes and long-term sustainability. This protocol outlines a study designed to implement, evaluate and strengthen co-creation methodologies through a participatory and formative evaluation approach.

Methods: This study adopts a mixed-methods design within the ADVANCE project, a multi-country initiative focused on co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations across seven European countries. End-users, healthcare professionals, and decision-makers will be engaged throughout the project in both intervention design and evaluation. Co-creation activities initiated with intervention scenario building and prioritization, drawing on desk reviews and online Delphi surveys co-developed with locally-set Society Advisory Groups (SAGs). The selection of intervention scenarios for implementation was performed using scenario-based workshops involving stakeholders in six partner countries. A second goal is to evaluate the co-creation process, which was co-designed in consultation with country teams and SAGs. A longitudinal qualitative study based on semistructured interviews with co-creators across two time points will be conducted, following the co-development of the interview guide through an online World Café.

Discussion: This study introduces an innovative approach by embedding participatory and formative evaluation into the co-creation process, enabling ongoing adaptation of co-creation activities. Through continuous stakeholder engagement, the project seeks to address barriers deriving from power imbalances, conflicting priorities, and resource limitations. Qualitative and participatory methods will be combined to elicit stakeholders' views, identify drawbacks and promote adjustments to ensure meaningful collaboration and reduce participation fatigue. Expected outcomes include actionable recommendations to inform policy, reduce stigma and foster the co-creation of more inclusive, effective, sustainable and scalable mental health promotion and prevention strategies across Europe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信