Yusuf Ilhan, Onur Yazdan Balcık, Elif Sahın, Aysegul Merc Cetınkaya, Elvina Almuradova, Murat Bardakcı, Cigdem Dınckal, Murat Karateke, Kadriye Bır Yucel, Arif Hakan Onder, Yakup Ergun
{"title":"胃肠道肿瘤联合化疗方案中不使用5-氟尿嘧啶丸的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Yusuf Ilhan, Onur Yazdan Balcık, Elif Sahın, Aysegul Merc Cetınkaya, Elvina Almuradova, Murat Bardakcı, Cigdem Dınckal, Murat Karateke, Kadriye Bır Yucel, Arif Hakan Onder, Yakup Ergun","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2527962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of omitting the 5-FU bolus in chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers on treatment efficacy and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched major databases and congress proceedings until 25 October 2024 to identify studies comparing 5-FU bolus and non-5-FU bolus regimens in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. The studies included those reporting on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 7 studies with 12,698 patients. No significant differences in PFS (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83-1.07) or OS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.03) were found between the 5-FU bolus and non-bolus groups. However, significantly higher rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.37-0.57) and any grade thrombocytopenia (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35-0.80) were observed in the 5-FU bolus group. No significant differences were found for other toxicities like febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, or nausea.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates that the omission of 5-FU bolus from the commonly used 5-FU-based chemotherapy regimens in gastrointestinal cancers, with the use of only 5-FU infusion, may reduce the risk of hematologic toxicities such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia without affecting survival outcomes in metastatic gastrointestinal cancers.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024602968.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of omitting 5-fluorouracil bolus in combination chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Ilhan, Onur Yazdan Balcık, Elif Sahın, Aysegul Merc Cetınkaya, Elvina Almuradova, Murat Bardakcı, Cigdem Dınckal, Murat Karateke, Kadriye Bır Yucel, Arif Hakan Onder, Yakup Ergun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2025.2527962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of omitting the 5-FU bolus in chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers on treatment efficacy and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched major databases and congress proceedings until 25 October 2024 to identify studies comparing 5-FU bolus and non-5-FU bolus regimens in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. The studies included those reporting on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 7 studies with 12,698 patients. No significant differences in PFS (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83-1.07) or OS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.03) were found between the 5-FU bolus and non-bolus groups. However, significantly higher rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.37-0.57) and any grade thrombocytopenia (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35-0.80) were observed in the 5-FU bolus group. No significant differences were found for other toxicities like febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, or nausea.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates that the omission of 5-FU bolus from the commonly used 5-FU-based chemotherapy regimens in gastrointestinal cancers, with the use of only 5-FU infusion, may reduce the risk of hematologic toxicities such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia without affecting survival outcomes in metastatic gastrointestinal cancers.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024602968.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2527962\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2527962","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of omitting 5-fluorouracil bolus in combination chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Introduction: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of omitting the 5-FU bolus in chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers on treatment efficacy and toxicity.
Methods: We searched major databases and congress proceedings until 25 October 2024 to identify studies comparing 5-FU bolus and non-5-FU bolus regimens in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. The studies included those reporting on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients.
Results: The analysis included 7 studies with 12,698 patients. No significant differences in PFS (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83-1.07) or OS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.03) were found between the 5-FU bolus and non-bolus groups. However, significantly higher rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.37-0.57) and any grade thrombocytopenia (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35-0.80) were observed in the 5-FU bolus group. No significant differences were found for other toxicities like febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, or nausea.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that the omission of 5-FU bolus from the commonly used 5-FU-based chemotherapy regimens in gastrointestinal cancers, with the use of only 5-FU infusion, may reduce the risk of hematologic toxicities such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia without affecting survival outcomes in metastatic gastrointestinal cancers.
Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024602968.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.