{"title":"微生物病原体的多重分子面板能否改变危重患者的呼吸护理?","authors":"Julien Dessajan, Valentine Berti, Laurence Armand-Lefèvre, Guillaume Voiriot, Muriel Fartoukh, Jean-François Timsit","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2025.2527635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosing severe pneumonia accurately is often difficult because its clinical symptoms overlap with other respiratory illnesses. Treatment of severe lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) should start early. Rapid identification of responsible microorganisms and appropriate, not overly broad, antibiotic therapy is required to optimize prognosis. Unfortunately, the causative pathogen is often unidentified in pneumonia patients, and conventional bacterial cultures lack sensitivity and have slow turnaround times. Multiplex PCR (mPCR) respiratory panels, which quickly detect multiple bacterial pathogens, some common respiratory viruses, and key resistance genes, have become commercially available and may help achieve these objectives.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The authors will describe the available biological and clinical data on the benefits of mPCR in severe LRTI.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>mPCR offers early pathogen and resistance detection. However, mPCR panels do not detect all bacterial pathogens and may not differentiate between colonizing and infecting organisms. Detectable resistance genes do not always indicate phenotypic resistance. It should only be used in patients with adequate lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples. Additionally, evidence on whether mPCR panels improve antimicrobial use and patient outcomes remains limited and conflicting. This review provides a thorough overview of the rationale and clinical evidence for the use of mPCR panels for the detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in pneumonia diagnosis and management, as well as future research directions. [Figure: see text].</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can multiplex molecular panels of microbial pathogens transform respiratory care in critically ill patients?\",\"authors\":\"Julien Dessajan, Valentine Berti, Laurence Armand-Lefèvre, Guillaume Voiriot, Muriel Fartoukh, Jean-François Timsit\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737159.2025.2527635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosing severe pneumonia accurately is often difficult because its clinical symptoms overlap with other respiratory illnesses. Treatment of severe lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) should start early. Rapid identification of responsible microorganisms and appropriate, not overly broad, antibiotic therapy is required to optimize prognosis. Unfortunately, the causative pathogen is often unidentified in pneumonia patients, and conventional bacterial cultures lack sensitivity and have slow turnaround times. Multiplex PCR (mPCR) respiratory panels, which quickly detect multiple bacterial pathogens, some common respiratory viruses, and key resistance genes, have become commercially available and may help achieve these objectives.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The authors will describe the available biological and clinical data on the benefits of mPCR in severe LRTI.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>mPCR offers early pathogen and resistance detection. However, mPCR panels do not detect all bacterial pathogens and may not differentiate between colonizing and infecting organisms. Detectable resistance genes do not always indicate phenotypic resistance. It should only be used in patients with adequate lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples. Additionally, evidence on whether mPCR panels improve antimicrobial use and patient outcomes remains limited and conflicting. This review provides a thorough overview of the rationale and clinical evidence for the use of mPCR panels for the detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in pneumonia diagnosis and management, as well as future research directions. [Figure: see text].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2025.2527635\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2025.2527635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can multiplex molecular panels of microbial pathogens transform respiratory care in critically ill patients?
Introduction: Diagnosing severe pneumonia accurately is often difficult because its clinical symptoms overlap with other respiratory illnesses. Treatment of severe lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) should start early. Rapid identification of responsible microorganisms and appropriate, not overly broad, antibiotic therapy is required to optimize prognosis. Unfortunately, the causative pathogen is often unidentified in pneumonia patients, and conventional bacterial cultures lack sensitivity and have slow turnaround times. Multiplex PCR (mPCR) respiratory panels, which quickly detect multiple bacterial pathogens, some common respiratory viruses, and key resistance genes, have become commercially available and may help achieve these objectives.
Areas covered: The authors will describe the available biological and clinical data on the benefits of mPCR in severe LRTI.
Expert opinion: mPCR offers early pathogen and resistance detection. However, mPCR panels do not detect all bacterial pathogens and may not differentiate between colonizing and infecting organisms. Detectable resistance genes do not always indicate phenotypic resistance. It should only be used in patients with adequate lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples. Additionally, evidence on whether mPCR panels improve antimicrobial use and patient outcomes remains limited and conflicting. This review provides a thorough overview of the rationale and clinical evidence for the use of mPCR panels for the detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in pneumonia diagnosis and management, as well as future research directions. [Figure: see text].
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting.
Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.