肺摄取值(PUV):一种新的肺PET/CT成像量化方法。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Pierre-Yves Le Roux, Romain Le Pennec, Vincent Bourbonne, Frédérique Blanc-Béguin, Mathieu Pavoine, Kevin Kerleguer, Maëlle Mauguen, Olivier Pradier, Pierre-Yves Salaun, François Lucia, David Bourhis
{"title":"肺摄取值(PUV):一种新的肺PET/CT成像量化方法。","authors":"Pierre-Yves Le Roux, Romain Le Pennec, Vincent Bourbonne, Frédérique Blanc-Béguin, Mathieu Pavoine, Kevin Kerleguer, Maëlle Mauguen, Olivier Pradier, Pierre-Yves Salaun, François Lucia, David Bourhis","doi":"10.1186/s13550-025-01274-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A current limitation to the use of lung PET/CT is the absence of a tool that reliably and reproducibly quantifies the intensity of tracer uptake. We aim to develop a quantitative approach for lung perfusion PET/CT imaging. Sixty patients who underwent [68Ga]Ga-MAA PET/CT scans before (M0) and 3 months (M3) after completion of radiotherapy were analyzed. The anatomical lung volume (ALV) was delineated on the CT scan. CT and PET images were co-registered, and the ALV was transferred onto the PET images. The measured activity concentration (kBq/L) in each voxel was converted in three metrics: SUV based on normalizing the measured activity to the patient's weight (kg) and the injected dose (kBq); SUVp by normalizing to the ALV (L) and the injected dose (kBq); pulmonary uptake value (PUV) by normalizing to the ALV (L) and the total activity measured in the ALV (kBq). The mean SUV, SUVp and PUV values within the ALV were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) SUV in the ALV was 9.90 (5.24) with an inconsistently wide range of values from 0.11 to 22.52. The correlation coefficient between the patient's weight and the ALV was 0.14. The mean (SD) SUVp in the ALV was 0.54 (0.09). The mean (SD) percentage of [68Ga]Ga-MAA lung retention was 58.2% (7.7%), with significant variability both between patients and within repeated scans of the same patient. The mean PUV in the ALV used for normalization was equal to 1. Quantitative methods were tested in challenging scenarios for quantification, including patients exhibiting decorrelation between ALV and patient's weight and patients with different percentage of [68Ga]Ga-MAA lung retention between M0 and M3. In contrast to the SUV and SUVp metrics, the PUV method showed coherent results compared to visual analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The patient's weight and the injected activity are not suitable parameters for normalization in lung perfusion quantification. We proposed a quantitative metric for lung perfusion PET/CT imaging, based on normalizing the measured activity to the ALV computed from a co-registered CT scan and to the total activity measured in the ALV.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04942275. Registered 19 June 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":11611,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary uptake value (PUV): a new quantification method for lung PET/CT imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Pierre-Yves Le Roux, Romain Le Pennec, Vincent Bourbonne, Frédérique Blanc-Béguin, Mathieu Pavoine, Kevin Kerleguer, Maëlle Mauguen, Olivier Pradier, Pierre-Yves Salaun, François Lucia, David Bourhis\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13550-025-01274-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A current limitation to the use of lung PET/CT is the absence of a tool that reliably and reproducibly quantifies the intensity of tracer uptake. We aim to develop a quantitative approach for lung perfusion PET/CT imaging. Sixty patients who underwent [68Ga]Ga-MAA PET/CT scans before (M0) and 3 months (M3) after completion of radiotherapy were analyzed. The anatomical lung volume (ALV) was delineated on the CT scan. CT and PET images were co-registered, and the ALV was transferred onto the PET images. The measured activity concentration (kBq/L) in each voxel was converted in three metrics: SUV based on normalizing the measured activity to the patient's weight (kg) and the injected dose (kBq); SUVp by normalizing to the ALV (L) and the injected dose (kBq); pulmonary uptake value (PUV) by normalizing to the ALV (L) and the total activity measured in the ALV (kBq). The mean SUV, SUVp and PUV values within the ALV were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) SUV in the ALV was 9.90 (5.24) with an inconsistently wide range of values from 0.11 to 22.52. The correlation coefficient between the patient's weight and the ALV was 0.14. The mean (SD) SUVp in the ALV was 0.54 (0.09). The mean (SD) percentage of [68Ga]Ga-MAA lung retention was 58.2% (7.7%), with significant variability both between patients and within repeated scans of the same patient. The mean PUV in the ALV used for normalization was equal to 1. Quantitative methods were tested in challenging scenarios for quantification, including patients exhibiting decorrelation between ALV and patient's weight and patients with different percentage of [68Ga]Ga-MAA lung retention between M0 and M3. In contrast to the SUV and SUVp metrics, the PUV method showed coherent results compared to visual analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The patient's weight and the injected activity are not suitable parameters for normalization in lung perfusion quantification. We proposed a quantitative metric for lung perfusion PET/CT imaging, based on normalizing the measured activity to the ALV computed from a co-registered CT scan and to the total activity measured in the ALV.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04942275. Registered 19 June 2021.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214062/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-025-01274-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-025-01274-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前使用肺部PET/CT的一个限制是缺乏一种可靠、可重复地量化示踪剂摄取强度的工具。我们的目标是开发肺灌注PET/CT成像的定量方法。对60例放疗前(M0)和放疗结束后3个月(M3)行[68Ga]Ga-MAA PET/CT扫描的患者进行分析。CT扫描显示解剖肺体积(ALV)。CT和PET图像共配准,将ALV转移到PET图像上。每个体素中测量到的活性浓度(kBq/L)以三个指标进行转换:基于将测量到的活性归一化为患者体重(kg)和注射剂量(kBq)的SUV;SUVp归一化为ALV (L)和注射剂量(kBq);肺摄取值(PUV)通过归一化为ALV (L)和ALV测量的总活度(kBq)。测量ALV内的平均SUV、SUVp和PUV值。结果:ALV中SUV的平均(SD)值为9.90(5.24),取值范围从0.11到22.52不等。患者体重与ALV的相关系数为0.14。ALV的平均(SD) SUVp为0.54(0.09)。[68Ga]Ga-MAA肺保留的平均(SD)百分比为58.2%(7.7%),在患者之间和同一患者的重复扫描中具有显著差异。用于归一化的ALV中的平均PUV等于1。定量方法在具有挑战性的情况下进行了量化测试,包括ALV与体重呈去相关的患者,以及M0和M3之间具有不同百分比[68Ga]Ga-MAA肺保留的患者。与SUV和SUVp指标相比,PUV方法与视觉分析相比显示出一致的结果。结论:患者体重和注射活度不宜作为肺灌注定量归一化参数。我们提出了一种肺灌注PET/CT成像的定量指标,该指标基于将从共登记CT扫描计算的ALV和ALV中测量的总活性归一化。试验注册:NCT04942275。注册于2021年6月19日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulmonary uptake value (PUV): a new quantification method for lung PET/CT imaging.

Background: A current limitation to the use of lung PET/CT is the absence of a tool that reliably and reproducibly quantifies the intensity of tracer uptake. We aim to develop a quantitative approach for lung perfusion PET/CT imaging. Sixty patients who underwent [68Ga]Ga-MAA PET/CT scans before (M0) and 3 months (M3) after completion of radiotherapy were analyzed. The anatomical lung volume (ALV) was delineated on the CT scan. CT and PET images were co-registered, and the ALV was transferred onto the PET images. The measured activity concentration (kBq/L) in each voxel was converted in three metrics: SUV based on normalizing the measured activity to the patient's weight (kg) and the injected dose (kBq); SUVp by normalizing to the ALV (L) and the injected dose (kBq); pulmonary uptake value (PUV) by normalizing to the ALV (L) and the total activity measured in the ALV (kBq). The mean SUV, SUVp and PUV values within the ALV were measured.

Results: The mean (SD) SUV in the ALV was 9.90 (5.24) with an inconsistently wide range of values from 0.11 to 22.52. The correlation coefficient between the patient's weight and the ALV was 0.14. The mean (SD) SUVp in the ALV was 0.54 (0.09). The mean (SD) percentage of [68Ga]Ga-MAA lung retention was 58.2% (7.7%), with significant variability both between patients and within repeated scans of the same patient. The mean PUV in the ALV used for normalization was equal to 1. Quantitative methods were tested in challenging scenarios for quantification, including patients exhibiting decorrelation between ALV and patient's weight and patients with different percentage of [68Ga]Ga-MAA lung retention between M0 and M3. In contrast to the SUV and SUVp metrics, the PUV method showed coherent results compared to visual analysis.

Conclusion: The patient's weight and the injected activity are not suitable parameters for normalization in lung perfusion quantification. We proposed a quantitative metric for lung perfusion PET/CT imaging, based on normalizing the measured activity to the ALV computed from a co-registered CT scan and to the total activity measured in the ALV.

Trial registration: NCT04942275. Registered 19 June 2021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EJNMMI Research
EJNMMI Research RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING&nb-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Research publishes new basic, translational and clinical research in the field of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. Regular features include original research articles, rapid communication of preliminary data on innovative research, interesting case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor. Educational articles on basic sciences, fundamental aspects and controversy related to pre-clinical and clinical research or ethical aspects of research are also welcome. Timely reviews provide updates on current applications, issues in imaging research and translational aspects of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging technologies. The main emphasis is placed on the development of targeted imaging with radiopharmaceuticals within the broader context of molecular probes to enhance understanding and characterisation of the complex biological processes underlying disease and to develop, test and guide new treatment modalities, including radionuclide therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信