[177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的剂量学肿瘤分割方法比较

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Peter Frøhlich Staanum, Peter Iversen
{"title":"[177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的剂量学肿瘤分割方法比较","authors":"Peter Frøhlich Staanum, Peter Iversen","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00772-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tumour dosimetry after radionuclide therapy using <sup>177</sup>Lu-labelled radiopharmaceuticals requires determination of the <sup>177</sup>Lu mean concentration, but this is challenging as tumours are often small, or <sup>177</sup>Lu activity is present in nearby organs or other tumours. Here we present a comparison of methods for determination of <sup>177</sup>Lu mean concentration, and in turn absorbed tumour dose, applied to a small number of patients with prostate cancer treated by [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T. For application of each method, specific criteria on tumour diameter and tumour-background ratio must be fulfilled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen tumours in 9 patients were analyzed. Several methods, the so-called Small Volume of Interest (VOI) with a 20 mm diameter sphere, Large VOI and Isocontour methods, were found to be in good agreement. Relative to the chosen reference method (Isocontour method with partial volume correction), the relative percentage differences of <sup>177</sup>Lu concentration using either of these methods were in the range (-23)-26%. The relative differences of absorbed doses were in the range (-16)-19%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The agreement between the methods permits a comparison between dosimetry studies, where some of these methods are applied. As the application criteria are complementary, it is possible to include both small (> 15 mm diameter) solitary tumours and larger (> 30 mm diameter), possibly non-solitary, tumours in a dosimetry study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of tumour segmentation methods for dosimetry in [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T treated patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Frøhlich Staanum, Peter Iversen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40658-025-00772-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tumour dosimetry after radionuclide therapy using <sup>177</sup>Lu-labelled radiopharmaceuticals requires determination of the <sup>177</sup>Lu mean concentration, but this is challenging as tumours are often small, or <sup>177</sup>Lu activity is present in nearby organs or other tumours. Here we present a comparison of methods for determination of <sup>177</sup>Lu mean concentration, and in turn absorbed tumour dose, applied to a small number of patients with prostate cancer treated by [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T. For application of each method, specific criteria on tumour diameter and tumour-background ratio must be fulfilled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen tumours in 9 patients were analyzed. Several methods, the so-called Small Volume of Interest (VOI) with a 20 mm diameter sphere, Large VOI and Isocontour methods, were found to be in good agreement. Relative to the chosen reference method (Isocontour method with partial volume correction), the relative percentage differences of <sup>177</sup>Lu concentration using either of these methods were in the range (-23)-26%. The relative differences of absorbed doses were in the range (-16)-19%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The agreement between the methods permits a comparison between dosimetry studies, where some of these methods are applied. As the application criteria are complementary, it is possible to include both small (> 15 mm diameter) solitary tumours and larger (> 30 mm diameter), possibly non-solitary, tumours in a dosimetry study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214225/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00772-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00772-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用177Lu标记的放射性药物进行放射性核素治疗后的肿瘤剂量测定需要测定177Lu的平均浓度,但这具有挑战性,因为肿瘤通常很小,或者在附近器官或其他肿瘤中存在177Lu活性。在这里,我们提出了一种比较的方法来测定177Lu的平均浓度,进而吸收肿瘤剂量,应用于少数前列腺癌患者的[177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T治疗。对于每种方法的应用,必须满足肿瘤直径和肿瘤背景比的特定标准。结果:对9例患者18个肿瘤进行了分析。几种方法,即所谓的小兴趣体积(VOI)与直径20毫米的球体,大VOI和等高线方法,被发现是很好的一致。与选择的参考方法(部分体积校正的等高线法)相比,两种方法对177Lu浓度的相对百分比差异在(-23)-26%之间。吸收剂量的相对差异在(-16)-19%之间。结论:这些方法之间的一致性允许在应用其中一些方法的剂量学研究之间进行比较。由于应用标准是互补的,在剂量学研究中可能包括小的(>直径15毫米)孤立性肿瘤和较大的(>直径30毫米)可能非孤立性肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of tumour segmentation methods for dosimetry in [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T treated patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.

Background: Tumour dosimetry after radionuclide therapy using 177Lu-labelled radiopharmaceuticals requires determination of the 177Lu mean concentration, but this is challenging as tumours are often small, or 177Lu activity is present in nearby organs or other tumours. Here we present a comparison of methods for determination of 177Lu mean concentration, and in turn absorbed tumour dose, applied to a small number of patients with prostate cancer treated by [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T. For application of each method, specific criteria on tumour diameter and tumour-background ratio must be fulfilled.

Results: Eighteen tumours in 9 patients were analyzed. Several methods, the so-called Small Volume of Interest (VOI) with a 20 mm diameter sphere, Large VOI and Isocontour methods, were found to be in good agreement. Relative to the chosen reference method (Isocontour method with partial volume correction), the relative percentage differences of 177Lu concentration using either of these methods were in the range (-23)-26%. The relative differences of absorbed doses were in the range (-16)-19%.

Conclusions: The agreement between the methods permits a comparison between dosimetry studies, where some of these methods are applied. As the application criteria are complementary, it is possible to include both small (> 15 mm diameter) solitary tumours and larger (> 30 mm diameter), possibly non-solitary, tumours in a dosimetry study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信