Bert A C Zwaenepoel, Annefleur Kluft, Michelle Feijen, Jan W Schoones, Ward A Heggermont, Anastasia D Egorova, Saskia L M A Beeres
{"title":"基于cied的多传感器心力衰竭监测对死亡率、心力衰竭住院和门诊就诊的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Bert A C Zwaenepoel, Annefleur Kluft, Michelle Feijen, Jan W Schoones, Ward A Heggermont, Anastasia D Egorova, Saskia L M A Beeres","doi":"10.1007/s11897-025-00707-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)-based remote monitoring has been proposed to improve heart failure (HF) management by enabling early detection of decompensation. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of multisensor CIED-based monitoring in reducing mortality, HF hospitalizations, and unplanned HF outpatient visits.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Earlier CIED-based remote monitoring strategies were mainly based on single-sensor impedance-based algorithms, and showed limited clinical benefits. Newer multisensor CIED-based algorithms have shown promise in initial studies. However, their impact on clinical outcomes remains uncertain, and therefore current HF guidelines provide limited recommendations. Multisensor CIED-based algorithms reliably identify high-risk HF patients and their use leads to reductions in HF hospitalizations and unplanned outpatient HF visits, although prospective validation in RCTs is lacking for any of the algorithms. Standardized response strategies are needed to enhance clinical integration and generalizability. If validated, multisensor monitoring could become a key tool in HF management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10830,"journal":{"name":"Current Heart Failure Reports","volume":"22 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Multisensor CIED-based Heart Failure Monitoring on Mortality, Heart Failure Hospitalizations and Outpatient Visits: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Bert A C Zwaenepoel, Annefleur Kluft, Michelle Feijen, Jan W Schoones, Ward A Heggermont, Anastasia D Egorova, Saskia L M A Beeres\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11897-025-00707-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)-based remote monitoring has been proposed to improve heart failure (HF) management by enabling early detection of decompensation. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of multisensor CIED-based monitoring in reducing mortality, HF hospitalizations, and unplanned HF outpatient visits.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Earlier CIED-based remote monitoring strategies were mainly based on single-sensor impedance-based algorithms, and showed limited clinical benefits. Newer multisensor CIED-based algorithms have shown promise in initial studies. However, their impact on clinical outcomes remains uncertain, and therefore current HF guidelines provide limited recommendations. Multisensor CIED-based algorithms reliably identify high-risk HF patients and their use leads to reductions in HF hospitalizations and unplanned outpatient HF visits, although prospective validation in RCTs is lacking for any of the algorithms. Standardized response strategies are needed to enhance clinical integration and generalizability. If validated, multisensor monitoring could become a key tool in HF management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Heart Failure Reports\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213901/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Heart Failure Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-025-00707-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Heart Failure Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-025-00707-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Multisensor CIED-based Heart Failure Monitoring on Mortality, Heart Failure Hospitalizations and Outpatient Visits: A Systematic Review.
Purpose of review: Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)-based remote monitoring has been proposed to improve heart failure (HF) management by enabling early detection of decompensation. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of multisensor CIED-based monitoring in reducing mortality, HF hospitalizations, and unplanned HF outpatient visits.
Recent findings: Earlier CIED-based remote monitoring strategies were mainly based on single-sensor impedance-based algorithms, and showed limited clinical benefits. Newer multisensor CIED-based algorithms have shown promise in initial studies. However, their impact on clinical outcomes remains uncertain, and therefore current HF guidelines provide limited recommendations. Multisensor CIED-based algorithms reliably identify high-risk HF patients and their use leads to reductions in HF hospitalizations and unplanned outpatient HF visits, although prospective validation in RCTs is lacking for any of the algorithms. Standardized response strategies are needed to enhance clinical integration and generalizability. If validated, multisensor monitoring could become a key tool in HF management.
期刊介绍:
This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of heart failure. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as investigative, pharmacologic, and nonpharmacologic therapies, pathophysiology, and prevention. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.