发展中国家的电子医疗管理系统:综述。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Andrew Lambarth, Dalia Wainwright, Trisha Saha, Millicent Banks, Iona Minty, P A M K Abeywickrama, Reya V Shah, Yogini Jani, Reecha Sofat
{"title":"发展中国家的电子医疗管理系统:综述。","authors":"Andrew Lambarth, Dalia Wainwright, Trisha Saha, Millicent Banks, Iona Minty, P A M K Abeywickrama, Reya V Shah, Yogini Jani, Reecha Sofat","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicines are a major global health expense. However, suboptimal use increases costs and causes patient harm. One way to reduce costs and increase safe, efficient medicines use is with electronic medicines management systems (EMMS). They allow easy capture of routine health data which can facilitate research, service planning and reimbursement processes. There are various barriers to healthcare digitization in developing countries (DCs), although some have overcome these. We sought to understand the landscape of EMMS use in DCs. We systematically searched six bibliographic databases from inception to 23 October 2024 for studies reporting the implementation and/or use of EMMS in countries with lower than 'very high' Human Development Index (HDI). We qualitatively and quantitatively summarized data on geographic location, healthcare setting and system functionality. We created an interactive map illustrating spatial and temporal trends in EMMS use. A total of 314 records described the use of EMMS in 45 DCs, 206 of which described coexistence/integration of other health data (e.g., electronic health records [EHR]). Predominantly, EMMS were for prescribing (n = 264) or dispensing (n = 66), implemented in secondary care settings and operated locally rather than regionally or nationally. Common EMMS use-cases included adherence monitoring in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis treatment. Our findings highlight both widespread EMMS adoption-commonly in the context of a broader EHR-and persistent gaps in implementation. These insights could be used by policymakers and healthcare leaders to guide strategy and funding decisions. Existing systems could be leveraged for service planning, healthcare delivery and optimizing medicine use. Where EMMS are not yet in use, our findings provide a roadmap for stakeholders to identify and emulate successful implementations in similar healthcare settings. Expanding the interoperability and scale of EMMS could further enable transformative digital technologies, increasing efficiencies and coverage, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic medicine management systems in developing countries: A landscape review.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Lambarth, Dalia Wainwright, Trisha Saha, Millicent Banks, Iona Minty, P A M K Abeywickrama, Reya V Shah, Yogini Jani, Reecha Sofat\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bcp.70156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medicines are a major global health expense. However, suboptimal use increases costs and causes patient harm. One way to reduce costs and increase safe, efficient medicines use is with electronic medicines management systems (EMMS). They allow easy capture of routine health data which can facilitate research, service planning and reimbursement processes. There are various barriers to healthcare digitization in developing countries (DCs), although some have overcome these. We sought to understand the landscape of EMMS use in DCs. We systematically searched six bibliographic databases from inception to 23 October 2024 for studies reporting the implementation and/or use of EMMS in countries with lower than 'very high' Human Development Index (HDI). We qualitatively and quantitatively summarized data on geographic location, healthcare setting and system functionality. We created an interactive map illustrating spatial and temporal trends in EMMS use. A total of 314 records described the use of EMMS in 45 DCs, 206 of which described coexistence/integration of other health data (e.g., electronic health records [EHR]). Predominantly, EMMS were for prescribing (n = 264) or dispensing (n = 66), implemented in secondary care settings and operated locally rather than regionally or nationally. Common EMMS use-cases included adherence monitoring in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis treatment. Our findings highlight both widespread EMMS adoption-commonly in the context of a broader EHR-and persistent gaps in implementation. These insights could be used by policymakers and healthcare leaders to guide strategy and funding decisions. Existing systems could be leveraged for service planning, healthcare delivery and optimizing medicine use. Where EMMS are not yet in use, our findings provide a roadmap for stakeholders to identify and emulate successful implementations in similar healthcare settings. Expanding the interoperability and scale of EMMS could further enable transformative digital technologies, increasing efficiencies and coverage, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70156\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药品是一项主要的全球卫生支出。然而,不理想的使用会增加成本并对患者造成伤害。降低成本和增加安全、有效药物使用的一种方法是使用电子药物管理系统。它们可以方便地获取日常卫生数据,从而促进研究、服务规划和报销程序。发展中国家(dc)的医疗保健数字化存在各种障碍,尽管有些国家已经克服了这些障碍。我们试图了解在DCs中使用EMMS的情况。我们系统地检索了6个文献数据库,从建立到2024年10月23日,以报告在人类发展指数(HDI)低于“非常高”的国家实施和/或使用EMMS的研究。我们定性和定量地总结了地理位置、医疗环境和系统功能方面的数据。我们创建了一个交互式地图,说明了EMMS使用的时空趋势。共有314项记录描述了45个dc使用EMMS的情况,其中206项记录描述了其他健康数据(例如电子健康记录[EHR])的共存/整合。主要是,EMMS用于处方(n = 264)或配药(n = 66),在二级医疗机构实施,并在当地而不是区域或国家操作。常见的EMMS用例包括人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和结核病治疗中的依从性监测。我们的研究结果强调了EMMS的广泛采用(通常是在更广泛的ehr背景下)和实施中持续存在的差距。决策者和医疗保健领导者可以利用这些见解来指导战略和资金决策。现有系统可用于服务规划、医疗保健提供和优化药物使用。在尚未使用EMMS的地方,我们的研究结果为利益相关者提供了路线图,以识别和模仿类似医疗保健环境中的成功实施。扩大EMMS的互操作性和规模可以进一步实现变革性数字技术,提高效率和覆盖范围,并最终改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electronic medicine management systems in developing countries: A landscape review.

Medicines are a major global health expense. However, suboptimal use increases costs and causes patient harm. One way to reduce costs and increase safe, efficient medicines use is with electronic medicines management systems (EMMS). They allow easy capture of routine health data which can facilitate research, service planning and reimbursement processes. There are various barriers to healthcare digitization in developing countries (DCs), although some have overcome these. We sought to understand the landscape of EMMS use in DCs. We systematically searched six bibliographic databases from inception to 23 October 2024 for studies reporting the implementation and/or use of EMMS in countries with lower than 'very high' Human Development Index (HDI). We qualitatively and quantitatively summarized data on geographic location, healthcare setting and system functionality. We created an interactive map illustrating spatial and temporal trends in EMMS use. A total of 314 records described the use of EMMS in 45 DCs, 206 of which described coexistence/integration of other health data (e.g., electronic health records [EHR]). Predominantly, EMMS were for prescribing (n = 264) or dispensing (n = 66), implemented in secondary care settings and operated locally rather than regionally or nationally. Common EMMS use-cases included adherence monitoring in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis treatment. Our findings highlight both widespread EMMS adoption-commonly in the context of a broader EHR-and persistent gaps in implementation. These insights could be used by policymakers and healthcare leaders to guide strategy and funding decisions. Existing systems could be leveraged for service planning, healthcare delivery and optimizing medicine use. Where EMMS are not yet in use, our findings provide a roadmap for stakeholders to identify and emulate successful implementations in similar healthcare settings. Expanding the interoperability and scale of EMMS could further enable transformative digital technologies, increasing efficiencies and coverage, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信