不同剂量盐酸艾氯胺酮注射液治疗甲状腺癌根治性切除术的疗效和安全性:一项随机试验。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yihuan Luo, Hua Fang
{"title":"不同剂量盐酸艾氯胺酮注射液治疗甲状腺癌根治性切除术的疗效和安全性:一项随机试验。","authors":"Yihuan Luo, Hua Fang","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03174-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to the combination of remimazolam toluene sulfonate and esketamine hydrochloride in reducing postoperative complications and improving recovery outcomes in thyroid surgery patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred twenty patients undergoing radical thyroidectomy were randomly assigned to four groups: control group (Group C) and three esketamine groups (Groups S1, S2, S3). Before peeling, groups S1, S2, and S3 were administered with 0.15, 0.25, and 0.35 mg/kg of esketamine via slow intravenous injection, respectively. The primary outcomes was recovery quality (QoR-15). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain (NRS scores), incidence of coughing (Minogue score), hemodynamic stability, emotional recovery (HADS scores), extubation time, adverse reactions, and sufentanil consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline data showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Pain and HADS scores were significantly lower in Groups S2 and S3 (p < 0.05). QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in all esketamine groups (p < 0.05). Postoperative recovery and extubation times were longer in Groups S2 and S3 (p < 0.05), with Group S3 having the longest. Postoperative cough severity and incidence were significantly lower in Groups S2 and S3 (p < 0.05). HR and SBP increased at t1 in Groups S2 and S3 but normalized by t4, with less pronounced changes in Group S2. No significant differences in adverse reactions (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Esketamine at doses of 0.25 mg/kg/h and 0.35 mg/kg/h improves recovery, reduces pain and coughing, and maintains hemodynamic stability. A dose of 0.25 mg/kg/h offers optimal clinical benefits with faster recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"307"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of esketamine hydrochloride injection at different dosages for patients undergoing radical thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: a randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yihuan Luo, Hua Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-03174-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to the combination of remimazolam toluene sulfonate and esketamine hydrochloride in reducing postoperative complications and improving recovery outcomes in thyroid surgery patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred twenty patients undergoing radical thyroidectomy were randomly assigned to four groups: control group (Group C) and three esketamine groups (Groups S1, S2, S3). Before peeling, groups S1, S2, and S3 were administered with 0.15, 0.25, and 0.35 mg/kg of esketamine via slow intravenous injection, respectively. The primary outcomes was recovery quality (QoR-15). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain (NRS scores), incidence of coughing (Minogue score), hemodynamic stability, emotional recovery (HADS scores), extubation time, adverse reactions, and sufentanil consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline data showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Pain and HADS scores were significantly lower in Groups S2 and S3 (p < 0.05). QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in all esketamine groups (p < 0.05). Postoperative recovery and extubation times were longer in Groups S2 and S3 (p < 0.05), with Group S3 having the longest. Postoperative cough severity and incidence were significantly lower in Groups S2 and S3 (p < 0.05). HR and SBP increased at t1 in Groups S2 and S3 but normalized by t4, with less pronounced changes in Group S2. No significant differences in adverse reactions (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Esketamine at doses of 0.25 mg/kg/h and 0.35 mg/kg/h improves recovery, reduces pain and coughing, and maintains hemodynamic stability. A dose of 0.25 mg/kg/h offers optimal clinical benefits with faster recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211291/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03174-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03174-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨雷马唑仑与盐酸艾氯胺酮联合治疗甲状腺手术患者减少术后并发症,提高康复效果。方法:120例甲状腺根治性切除术患者随机分为4组:对照组(C组)和艾氯胺酮组(S1、S2、S3组)。剥皮前,S1组、S2组、S3组分别给予0.15、0.25、0.35 mg/kg埃氯胺酮缓慢静脉注射。主要观察指标为恢复质量(QoR-15)。次要结局包括术后疼痛(NRS评分)、咳嗽发生率(Minogue评分)、血流动力学稳定性、情绪恢复(HADS评分)、拔管时间、不良反应和舒芬太尼消耗。结果:基线数据差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。S2组和S3组疼痛和HADS评分均显著低于对照组(p < 0.05)。结论:0.25 mg/kg/h和0.35 mg/kg/h剂量的艾氯胺酮可促进康复,减轻疼痛和咳嗽,维持血流动力学稳定性。0.25 mg/kg/h的剂量具有最佳的临床效果,恢复更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of esketamine hydrochloride injection at different dosages for patients undergoing radical thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: a randomized trial.

Objective: This study aims to the combination of remimazolam toluene sulfonate and esketamine hydrochloride in reducing postoperative complications and improving recovery outcomes in thyroid surgery patients.

Methods: One hundred twenty patients undergoing radical thyroidectomy were randomly assigned to four groups: control group (Group C) and three esketamine groups (Groups S1, S2, S3). Before peeling, groups S1, S2, and S3 were administered with 0.15, 0.25, and 0.35 mg/kg of esketamine via slow intravenous injection, respectively. The primary outcomes was recovery quality (QoR-15). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain (NRS scores), incidence of coughing (Minogue score), hemodynamic stability, emotional recovery (HADS scores), extubation time, adverse reactions, and sufentanil consumption.

Results: Baseline data showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Pain and HADS scores were significantly lower in Groups S2 and S3 (p < 0.05). QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in all esketamine groups (p < 0.05). Postoperative recovery and extubation times were longer in Groups S2 and S3 (p < 0.05), with Group S3 having the longest. Postoperative cough severity and incidence were significantly lower in Groups S2 and S3 (p < 0.05). HR and SBP increased at t1 in Groups S2 and S3 but normalized by t4, with less pronounced changes in Group S2. No significant differences in adverse reactions (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Esketamine at doses of 0.25 mg/kg/h and 0.35 mg/kg/h improves recovery, reduces pain and coughing, and maintains hemodynamic stability. A dose of 0.25 mg/kg/h offers optimal clinical benefits with faster recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信