前往无家可归者支持中心(SCeTCH)的人的戒烟:在英国的一项随机对照试验中,比较电子烟与常规护理的提供。

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lynne Dawkins, Kirstie Soar, Francesca Pesola, Allison Ford, Caitlin Notley, Rachel Brown, Emma Ward, Lauren McMillan, Debbie Robson, Anna Varley, Charlotte Mair, Jessica Lennon, Janine Brierley, Amy Edwards, Peter Hajek, Allan Tyler, Steve Parrott, Jinshuo Li, Linda Bauld, Bethany Gardner, Sharon Cox
{"title":"前往无家可归者支持中心(SCeTCH)的人的戒烟:在英国的一项随机对照试验中,比较电子烟与常规护理的提供。","authors":"Lynne Dawkins, Kirstie Soar, Francesca Pesola, Allison Ford, Caitlin Notley, Rachel Brown, Emma Ward, Lauren McMillan, Debbie Robson, Anna Varley, Charlotte Mair, Jessica Lennon, Janine Brierley, Amy Edwards, Peter Hajek, Allan Tyler, Steve Parrott, Jinshuo Li, Linda Bauld, Bethany Gardner, Sharon Cox","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04167-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoking rates are exceptionally high among people experiencing homelessness. We aimed to test the effectiveness of an e-cigarette (EC) intervention designed to help people accessing homeless support services to stop smoking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. We recruited 32 homeless centres (clusters) across Great Britain. Participants were aged 18 + and known by centre staff to smoke. Randomisation of clusters (1:1; using various block sizes) to EC or usual care (UC) was generated in Stata by the trial statistician, concealed from researchers. Participants in EC clusters received a refillable EC, 4-week supply of e-liquid, and a fact sheet. UC participants received very brief advice on smoking, a support leaflet, and signposting to the stop smoking service. Interventions were delivered by centre staff. The primary outcome was sustained abstinence from smoking from 2 weeks post-baseline through to 24 weeks, verified by carbon monoxide (CO) measurements below 8 ppm. Secondary outcomes included CO-verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence. Analysis was intention-to-treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between February 22, 2022, and June 22, 2023, 16 centres were randomised to EC (n = 239 participants) and 16 to UC (n = 238 participants). In UC, one participant died, and one withdrew consent. Final sample analysed: n = 239 (EC); n = 236 (UC). Sustained 24-week CO-validated smoking cessation rates were 5/239 (2.1%) with EC vs. 2/236 (0.8%) with UC (aRR: 2.43, 95%CI: 0.51-11.64). Seven-point prevalence abstinence was 15/239 (6.3%) in the EC arm vs. 5/236 (2.1%) in UC (aRR: 2.95, 95%CI: 1.05-8.29). Four adverse events were reported in the EC arm; three deemed EC-related and not serious; one serious and not EC-related.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EC did not support sustained smoking abstinence for 24 weeks. Seven-day point prevalence abstinence rates suggest that cessation is possible, but more support may be needed to sustain this.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was preregistered on the ISTCTN registry #18566874. Registration date: 12/10/2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"394"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smoking cessation for people accessing homeless support centres (SCeTCH): comparing the provision of an e-cigarette versus usual care in a cluster randomised controlled trial in Great Britain.\",\"authors\":\"Lynne Dawkins, Kirstie Soar, Francesca Pesola, Allison Ford, Caitlin Notley, Rachel Brown, Emma Ward, Lauren McMillan, Debbie Robson, Anna Varley, Charlotte Mair, Jessica Lennon, Janine Brierley, Amy Edwards, Peter Hajek, Allan Tyler, Steve Parrott, Jinshuo Li, Linda Bauld, Bethany Gardner, Sharon Cox\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12916-025-04167-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoking rates are exceptionally high among people experiencing homelessness. We aimed to test the effectiveness of an e-cigarette (EC) intervention designed to help people accessing homeless support services to stop smoking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. We recruited 32 homeless centres (clusters) across Great Britain. Participants were aged 18 + and known by centre staff to smoke. Randomisation of clusters (1:1; using various block sizes) to EC or usual care (UC) was generated in Stata by the trial statistician, concealed from researchers. Participants in EC clusters received a refillable EC, 4-week supply of e-liquid, and a fact sheet. UC participants received very brief advice on smoking, a support leaflet, and signposting to the stop smoking service. Interventions were delivered by centre staff. The primary outcome was sustained abstinence from smoking from 2 weeks post-baseline through to 24 weeks, verified by carbon monoxide (CO) measurements below 8 ppm. Secondary outcomes included CO-verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence. Analysis was intention-to-treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between February 22, 2022, and June 22, 2023, 16 centres were randomised to EC (n = 239 participants) and 16 to UC (n = 238 participants). In UC, one participant died, and one withdrew consent. Final sample analysed: n = 239 (EC); n = 236 (UC). Sustained 24-week CO-validated smoking cessation rates were 5/239 (2.1%) with EC vs. 2/236 (0.8%) with UC (aRR: 2.43, 95%CI: 0.51-11.64). Seven-point prevalence abstinence was 15/239 (6.3%) in the EC arm vs. 5/236 (2.1%) in UC (aRR: 2.95, 95%CI: 1.05-8.29). Four adverse events were reported in the EC arm; three deemed EC-related and not serious; one serious and not EC-related.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EC did not support sustained smoking abstinence for 24 weeks. Seven-day point prevalence abstinence rates suggest that cessation is possible, but more support may be needed to sustain this.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was preregistered on the ISTCTN registry #18566874. Registration date: 12/10/2021.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04167-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04167-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无家可归者的吸烟率异常高。我们的目的是测试电子烟(EC)干预的有效性,该干预旨在帮助获得无家可归者支持服务的人戒烟。方法:采用双组随机对照试验。我们在英国招募了32个无家可归者中心(集群)。参与者年龄在18岁以上,中心工作人员知道他们吸烟。集群随机化(1:1;使用不同块大小)到EC或常规护理(UC)是由试验统计学家在Stata中生成的,对研究人员隐瞒。EC组的参与者收到了可再填充的EC、4周的电子液体供应和一份情况说明书。参加者可获得简短的戒烟建议、支援单张及戒烟服务指引。干预措施由中心工作人员提供。主要结果是基线后2周至24周的持续戒烟,通过一氧化碳(CO)测量低于8ppm来验证。次要结果包括co验证的7天点流行禁欲。分析是意向治疗。结果:在2022年2月22日至2023年6月22日期间,16个中心随机分配到EC (n = 239名参与者)和16个中心到UC (n = 238名参与者)。在UC,一名参与者死亡,一名撤回同意。最终分析样品:n = 239 (EC);n = 236 (UC)。经co验证的持续24周戒烟率为EC组5/239 (2.1%),UC组2/236 (0.8%)(aRR: 2.43, 95%CI: 0.51-11.64)。7点戒断率在EC组为15/239 (6.3%),UC组为5/236 (2.1%)(aRR: 2.95, 95%CI: 1.05-8.29)。EC组报告了4例不良事件;3例被认为与欧共体有关,但不严重;一个严肃的,与欧共体无关的。结论:EC不支持持续戒烟24周。7天点流行戒断率表明戒烟是可能的,但可能需要更多的支持来维持这一点。试验注册:该试验在ISTCTN注册中心#18566874上预注册。报名日期:12/10/2021
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Smoking cessation for people accessing homeless support centres (SCeTCH): comparing the provision of an e-cigarette versus usual care in a cluster randomised controlled trial in Great Britain.

Background: Smoking rates are exceptionally high among people experiencing homelessness. We aimed to test the effectiveness of an e-cigarette (EC) intervention designed to help people accessing homeless support services to stop smoking.

Methods: A two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. We recruited 32 homeless centres (clusters) across Great Britain. Participants were aged 18 + and known by centre staff to smoke. Randomisation of clusters (1:1; using various block sizes) to EC or usual care (UC) was generated in Stata by the trial statistician, concealed from researchers. Participants in EC clusters received a refillable EC, 4-week supply of e-liquid, and a fact sheet. UC participants received very brief advice on smoking, a support leaflet, and signposting to the stop smoking service. Interventions were delivered by centre staff. The primary outcome was sustained abstinence from smoking from 2 weeks post-baseline through to 24 weeks, verified by carbon monoxide (CO) measurements below 8 ppm. Secondary outcomes included CO-verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence. Analysis was intention-to-treat.

Results: Between February 22, 2022, and June 22, 2023, 16 centres were randomised to EC (n = 239 participants) and 16 to UC (n = 238 participants). In UC, one participant died, and one withdrew consent. Final sample analysed: n = 239 (EC); n = 236 (UC). Sustained 24-week CO-validated smoking cessation rates were 5/239 (2.1%) with EC vs. 2/236 (0.8%) with UC (aRR: 2.43, 95%CI: 0.51-11.64). Seven-point prevalence abstinence was 15/239 (6.3%) in the EC arm vs. 5/236 (2.1%) in UC (aRR: 2.95, 95%CI: 1.05-8.29). Four adverse events were reported in the EC arm; three deemed EC-related and not serious; one serious and not EC-related.

Conclusions: EC did not support sustained smoking abstinence for 24 weeks. Seven-day point prevalence abstinence rates suggest that cessation is possible, but more support may be needed to sustain this.

Trial registration: The trial was preregistered on the ISTCTN registry #18566874. Registration date: 12/10/2021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信